Intravenous(IV) vs. Erector Spinae Plane Blocks in Cardiac Surgery

NCT ID: NCT04995497

Last Updated: 2025-04-09

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

70 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-08-15

Study Completion Date

2023-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Interfascial plane blocks have been developed for analgesia, among which the erector spinae plane (ESP) has gained popularity. The ESP block has been hypothesized to provide truncal analgesia by spread of local anesthetic into the paravertebral space. Recent studies have contested this idea showing unreliability in the spread of the local anesthetic into the paravertebral space.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Post-operative pain is a significant issue following open heart surgeries and poorly controlled pain can result in significant cardiorespiratory morbidity. Many patients suffer pain both at rest (49%) and on movement (62%) following open heart surgeries via sternotomy and adequate pain management requires closer re-assessment and treatment. The intensity of pain is noted to be higher in the first 48 hours post surgery and hence modalities to control pain may make the greatest difference in the first 2 days after surgery.

Enhanced recovery pathways utilizing multimodal analgesia have shown significant analgesic and opioid sparing benefit while minimizing ICU and length of hospital stays. Some multimodal regimens have also incorporated regional blocks but the optimal analgesic regimen remains elusive. The ESP block has been hypothesized to provide truncal anesthesia by spread of local anesthetic into the paravertebral space, but recent studies contest this idea. Bilateral paravertebral blocks can result in higher than acceptable levels of local anesthetic in both cardiac and non-cardiac surgical patients and this may be true following bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) as well. Hence, the pharmacokinetic profile of administered local anesthetics is necessary given the lack of information about the local anesthetic systemic levels following bilateral ESP.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Erector Spinae Plane Block Pain Control Post-Operative Pain, Chronic

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Erector Spinae Plane Block-Administration of Lidocaine

Bilateral ultrasound guided erector spinae plane catheter placement for the administration of lidocaine. Dose will be 2 mg/kg ideal body weight. Bolus will be divided equally between the two ESP catheters. This is followed by lidocaine infusion via ESP catheter at 2 mg/kg/hr for 48 hours after catheter placement.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Administration of Lidocaine Post Cardiac Surgery via ESP Catheter

Intervention Type DRUG

Lidocaine will be administered via ESP catheter. Initial dose will be at 2 mg/kg ideal body weight split between two catheters followed by dosing at 2 mg/kg/hr for 48 hours

Intravenous-Administration of Lidocaine

Subject will receive a bolus of lidocaine at 2 mg/kg ideal body weight. This is followed by lidocaine infusion via intravenous route at 2 mg/kg/hr for 48 hours.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Intravenous Administration of Lidocaine Post Cardiac Surgery

Intervention Type DRUG

Lidocaine will be administered via intravenously. Initial dose will be at 2 mg/kg ideal body weight followed by dosing at 2 mg/kg/hr for 48 hours

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Intravenous Administration of Lidocaine Post Cardiac Surgery

Lidocaine will be administered via intravenously. Initial dose will be at 2 mg/kg ideal body weight followed by dosing at 2 mg/kg/hr for 48 hours

Intervention Type DRUG

Administration of Lidocaine Post Cardiac Surgery via ESP Catheter

Lidocaine will be administered via ESP catheter. Initial dose will be at 2 mg/kg ideal body weight split between two catheters followed by dosing at 2 mg/kg/hr for 48 hours

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Pain control post cardiac surgery Pain control post cardiac surgery

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Undergoing elective cardiac surgery for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or valve surgery via sternotomy.
* English speaking

Exclusion Criteria

* Emergency surgery
* Allergy to medications (ie lidocaine)
* BMI less than 20 or greater than 50
* Major liver or kidney dysfunction or other pre-existing major organ dysfunction
* Revision cardiac surgery
* Surgery via thoracotomy
* Off-pump coronary artery bypass
* Narcotic dependent (Opioid intake morphine equivalents greater than 10mg/day for more than 3 months
* Chronic pain (ie fibromyalgia)
* Significant central nervous system or respiratory disease
* Hematological disorders or de-ranged coagulation parameters
* Psychiatric illness that impedes subject from providing informed consent
* Pre-operative neurological deficits
* Language barrier
* Inability to provide informed consent
* Prisoner status
* Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Archit Sharma

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Archit Sharma

Clinical Associate Professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Archit Sharma, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Iowa

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

202009510

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

GA + ESP vs. SA + ESP in Lumbar Decompression Surgeries
NCT05444751 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION PHASE3
Erector Spinae Block for Spine Surgery
NCT05417113 TERMINATED PHASE4
ESP Block for Post Cesarean Analgesia
NCT05664958 COMPLETED PHASE4