Erector Spinae Block Versus Surgeon Infiltration in VATS Procedures
NCT ID: NCT03859635
Last Updated: 2025-02-28
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-02-07
2022-11-07
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery - Exparel Study
NCT04864210
Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block vs Intravenous Lignocaine Infusion in (VATS)
NCT06289790
Erector Spinae Plane Block For Analgesia Following Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery
NCT03860480
Erector Spinae Plane Block With Bupivacaine for Medical Thoracoscopy
NCT06313632
Local Anesthetic as Single Shot Versus Catheter in Patients Undergoing Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery
NCT04559347
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
For the LB group (Ultrasound guided LB Erector Spinae Plane Block), patients should receive a total of 10ml 0.25% bupivacaine plus 20ml Exparel® (15ml at T4 and 15ml at T8) For the SB group (Ultrasound guided SB Erector Spinae Plane Block), patients should receive a total of 30ml 0.5% bupivacaine. (15ml at T4 and 15ml at T8) For the SI group (under video guidance) injected by surgeon using 10ml 0.25% bupivacaine plus 20ml Exparel
All the erector spinae plane blocks will be placed preoperatively after sedation, before intubation and prior to surgery. All procedures will be placed under the supervision of the attending anesthesiologist on the acute pain service or the attending anesthesiologist in the operating room.
For the ESP block, an ultrasound probe is used to visualize the ES musculature about 3 cm laterally from the spinous process. In a cephalad-to-caudad direction advance the needle and inject the anesthetic in the interfacial plane deep to the ES muscles. Confirm positioning by visualization of needle tip and elevation of ES muscles off the transverse process with anesthetic injection. Injection will be performed at T4 and T8 level.
Surgeon infiltration is performed intraoperatively under direct thoracoscopic guidance. The intercostal space will be visualized and injected with LB. Typically, T4 through T8 are infiltrated with the anesthetic mixture.
All patients will be placed on ERAS protocol, which is our standard of practice.
Opioid usage after the block will be recorded by a member of the research team. Pain scores at rest and on movement (knee flexion) will be measured by the investigator using Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Nausea will be measured using a categorical scoring system (none=0; mild=1; moderate=2; severe=3). Sedation scores will also be assessed by a member of the study team using a sedation scale (awake and alert=0; quietly awake=1; asleep but easily roused=2; deep sleep=3). All these parameters will be measured at 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours after the surgery.
All patients will receive a phone call 6 months after surgery for assessment for chronic post-surgical pain. Patients will be assessed by a member of the research team over the phone. They will be assessed on their pain score and narcotic usage by using the Brief Pain Inventory. Study participation will conclude after the 6 month follow questionnaire has been completed.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
1. Ultrasound guided LB Erector Spinae Plane Block with 20ml of Exparel and 10ml 0.25% bupivacaine
2. Ultrasound guided SB Erector Spinae Plane Block with 30ml 0.5% bupivacaine
3. Surgeon Infiltration under video guidance with 20ml of Exparel and 10ml of 0.25% bupivacaine
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Ultrasound guided Liposomal Bupivacaine Erector Spinae Block
All the erector spinae plane blocks will be placed preoperatively using Liposomal Buvicaine. All procedures will be placed under the supervision of the attending anesthesiologist on the acute pain service or the attending anesthesiologist in the operating room.
Liposomal Bupivacaine
20 ml
Bupivacaine, 0.25%
10 ml
Ultrasound guided Standard Bupivacaine Erector Spinae Block
All the erector spinae plane blocks will be placed preoperatively using Liposomal Buvicaine. All procedures will be placed under the supervision of the attending anesthesiologist on the acute pain service or the attending anesthesiologist in the operating room.
Bupivacaine, 0.5%
30 ml
Surgeon Infiltration
At the end of the surgery, the surgeon will infiltrate liposomal bupivacaine under thoracoscopic guidance along the intercostal nerves from T4-T8.
Liposomal Bupivacaine
20 ml
Bupivacaine, 0.25%
10 ml
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Liposomal Bupivacaine
20 ml
Bupivacaine, 0.25%
10 ml
Bupivacaine, 0.5%
30 ml
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ASA 1,2,3 or 4
* Age 18 or older, male or female
* Desires regional anesthesia for postoperative pain control
Exclusion Criteria
* History of substance abuse in the past 6 months which would include heroin, marijuana or any other illegal street drugs
* Patient staying intubated after surgery
* Patient (home dose) taking more than 30mg PO morphine equivalent per day
* Known allergy or other contraindications to the study medications, which include dilaudid and bupivacaine.
* Pts. scheduled for a pleurodesis, decortication or esophagectomy at Indiana University Hospital
18 Years
100 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Indiana University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Yar Yeap
Assistant Professor of Clinical Anesthesiology. Director, Acute Pain Service
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Yar Yeap, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Indiana University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Indiana University Hospital
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bottiger BA, Esper SA, Stafford-Smith M. Pain management strategies for thoracotomy and thoracic pain syndromes. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2014 Mar;18(1):45-56. doi: 10.1177/1089253213514484. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
Singh S, Chowdhary NK. Erector spinae plane block an effective block for post-operative analgesia in modified radical mastectomy. Indian J Anaesth. 2018 Feb;62(2):148-150. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_726_17. No abstract available.
Tulgar S, Kapakli MS, Senturk O, Selvi O, Serifsoy TE, Ozer Z. Evaluation of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Clin Anesth. 2018 Sep;49:101-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.06.019. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
Rao Kadam V, Currie J. Ultrasound-guided continuous erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in video-assisted thoracotomy. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2018 Mar;46(2):243-245. No abstract available.
Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):621-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451.
Forero M, Rajarathinam M, Adhikary S, Chin KJ. Erector spinae plane (ESP) block in the management of post thoracotomy pain syndrome: A case series. Scand J Pain. 2017 Oct;17:325-329. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2017.08.013. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
Taylor R, Massey S, Stuart-Smith K. Postoperative analgesia in video-assisted thoracoscopy: the role of intercostal blockade. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2004 Jun;18(3):317-21. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2004.03.012.
Wu ZQ, Min JK, Wang D, Yuan YJ, Li H. Liposome bupivacaine for pain control after total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2016 Jul 22;11(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s13018-016-0420-z.
Yu ZX, Yang ZZ, Yao LL. Effectiveness of liposome bupivacaine for postoperative pain control in total knee arthroplasty: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Mar;97(13):e0171. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010171.
Ma TT, Wang YH, Jiang YF, Peng CB, Yan C, Liu ZG, Xu WX. Liposomal bupivacaine versus traditional bupivacaine for pain control after total hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jun;96(25):e7190. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007190.
Raman S, Lin M, Krishnan N. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine in colorectal resections. J Drug Assess. 2018 Jun 29;7(1):43-50. doi: 10.1080/21556660.2018.1487445. eCollection 2018.
Knudson RA, Dunlavy PW, Franko J, Raman SR, Kraemer SR. Effectiveness of Liposomal Bupivacaine in Colorectal Surgery: A Pragmatic Nonsponsored Prospective Randomized Double Blinded Trial in a Community Hospital. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016 Sep;59(9):862-9. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000648.
Knight RB, Walker PW, Keegan KA, Overholser SM, Baumgartner TS, Ebertowski JS 2nd, Aden JK, White MA. A Randomized Controlled Trial for Pain Control in Laparoscopic Urologic Surgery: 0.25% Bupivacaine Versus Long-Acting Liposomal Bupivacaine. J Endourol. 2015 Sep;29(9):1019-24. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0769. Epub 2015 Jun 5.
Noviasky J, Pierce DP, Whalen K, Guharoy R, Hildreth K. Bupivacaine liposomal versus bupivacaine: comparative review. Hosp Pharm. 2014 Jun;49(6):539-43. doi: 10.1310/hpj4906-539.
Kaplowitz J, Papadakos PJ. Acute pain management for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: an update. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012 Apr;26(2):312-21. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2011.04.010. Epub 2011 Jun 25. No abstract available.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1809656804
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.