Randomized Trial of Erector Spinae Plane Block Using Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Bupivacaine Hydrochloride on Quality of Recovery for Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery

NCT ID: NCT07141667

Last Updated: 2025-08-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-08-31

Study Completion Date

2028-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has emerged as the standard surgical modality for pulmonary tumor. Compared with open thoracotomy, VATS is associated with reduced surgical trauma, attenuated postoperative pain, and a lower incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications. Nevertheless, 27-63% of VATS patients still develop moderate to severe postoperative pain, with the incidence of chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) remaining at 25-44%.

Regional analgesic techniques constitute a pivotal component of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in thoracic surgery. Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) and paravertebral block (PVB) have been regarded as the gold-standard regional analgesic modalities for open thoracotomy. Accumulating evidence indicates that erector spinae plane block (ESPB) achieves postoperative analgesic efficacy comparable to that of PVB. In contrast to TEA, both PVB and ESPB are associated with a lower risk of complications such as hypotension, urinary retention, and epidural hematoma.

A recent randomized controlled trial comparing continuous ESPB and continuous PVB demonstrated that continuous ESPB improves the quality of postoperative recovery in VATS patients. Previous studies have also confirmed that single-injection ESPB provides superior recovery quality and analgesic efficacy compared with single-injection PVB in VATS patients. However, single-dose nerve block only exert effects for 8-12 hours, while continuous nerve blocks may increase the risk of infection and compromise patient comfort. Moderate to severe postoperative pain in VATS patients predominantly occurs within the first 48 hours postoperatively, with the most intense pain typically observed on the first postoperative day. Therefore, there is an urgent need to explore analgesic techniques with prolonged duration and fewer complications for application in VATS.

Liposomal bupivacaine, a novel extended-release local anesthetic approved by the FDA for clinical use, can prolong the duration of local anesthesia to 72 hours. Its clinical efficacy in procedures such as brachial plexus block has been validated. However, the application of liposomal bupivacaine in erector spinae plane block for VATS, and its impact on the quality of postoperative recovery, remains unreported.This study will test the hypothesis that erector spinae plane block with liposomal bupivacaine for VATS can enhance patients' quality of recovery-15 score (QoR-15) at 48 h.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a prospective randomized controlled trial. Patients scheduled for elective video-assisted thoracoscopic pulmonary resection will be randomly assigned to two groups: the liposomal bupivacaine group, which will undergo erector spinae plane block with liposomal bupivacaine, and the bupivacaine hydrochloride group, which will receive erector spinae plane block with bupivacaine hydrochloride. Quality of recovery-15 score (QoR-15) and other outcome measures will be observed, and our hypothesis is that erector spinae plane block with liposomal bupivacaine can enhance patients' quality of recovery-15 score (QoR-15) at 48 h.

In the anesthesia induction suite, the anesthesiologist administers an ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane (ESP) block prior to the induction of general anesthesia. The procedure involves the sequential injection of 10 mL of normal saline, followed by the administration of 0.5% bupivacaine HCL 20ml or 1.33% liposomal bupivacaine 20ml.

Postoperatively, the following analgesic protocols are administered routinely:

Basic analgesia: Parecoxib sodium (a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug) 40 mg, every 12 hours;Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA): A background infusion of sufentanil at 2 μg/h, with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) boluses of sufentanil 2 μg and a lockout period of 15 minutes;Postoperative rescue analgesia: If NRS score is ≥ 4, the attending physician will administer rescue analgesia, which will be documented in the medical record.

Safety reporting: Any unexpected complications that may arise from this trial will be documented and reported to the principal investigator and the relevant hospital patient safety board.

Sample size and justification: The primary outcome will be the QoR-15 score at 48 hours post operatively.According to published studies on quality of recovery, the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the QoR-15 score after surgery is 8. For major surgeries, the standard deviation (SD) of postoperative QoR-15 scores typically ranges from 10 to 16, and an SD of 12 was selected for this study. Using a two-tailed test with a significance level of α=0.05 and a test power of 1-β=0.8, the sample size calculated for each group (for comparison between the two groups) was 36 participants. With an estimated dropout rate of 10%, the final sample size was determined to be 40 participants per group, resulting in a total sample size of 80 participants.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Regional Anesthesia Morbidity Pain, Postoperative

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

A single-blind, prospective, randomized controlled trial. Eligible patients scheduled for elective unilateral thoracic pulmonary resection will be randomly allocated to either the liposomal bupivacaine group or the bupivacaine HCL group. Patients in the liposomal bupivacaine group will undergo ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block with liposomal bupivacaine, whereas those in the bupivacaine HCL group will receive ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane nerve block with bupivacaine hydrochloride.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
This study adopts a single-blind design, where participants will be kept blinded to their assigned groups to minimize bias in subjective evaluations. Anesthesia providers will be responsible for screening and enrolling eligible patients, as well as administering the assigned anesthesia protocols. Importantly, the roles of anesthesia providers and postoperative follow-up personnel will be strictly separated, with the latter remaining unaware of the randomization details throughout the entire study period.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Bupivacaine HCL Group

Erector spinae plane block with normal saline 10ml and bupivacaine HCL 0.5% 20ml

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Erector spinae plane block with bupivacaine HCL

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In the anesthesia induction suite, the anesthesiologist administers an ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane (ESP) block under local anesthesia prior to the induction of general anesthesia. The procedure involves the sequential injection of 10 mL of normal saline, followed by the administration of 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine HCL.

Liposomal Bupivacaine Group

Erector spinae plane block with normal saline 10ml and liposomal bupivacaine 1.33% 20ml

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Erector spinae plane block with liposomal bupivacaine

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In the anesthesia induction suite, the anesthesiologist administers an ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane (ESP) block under local anesthesia prior to the induction of general anesthesia. The procedure involves the sequential injection of 10 mL of normal saline, followed by the administration of 20 mL of 1.33% liposomal bupivacaine.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Erector spinae plane block with liposomal bupivacaine

In the anesthesia induction suite, the anesthesiologist administers an ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane (ESP) block under local anesthesia prior to the induction of general anesthesia. The procedure involves the sequential injection of 10 mL of normal saline, followed by the administration of 20 mL of 1.33% liposomal bupivacaine.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Erector spinae plane block with bupivacaine HCL

In the anesthesia induction suite, the anesthesiologist administers an ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane (ESP) block under local anesthesia prior to the induction of general anesthesia. The procedure involves the sequential injection of 10 mL of normal saline, followed by the administration of 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine HCL.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18-75 yr of age
* ASA physical status 1 to 3
* Undergoing unilateral lung VATS under general anesthesia
* Obtaining informed consent from patients or legal representative

Exclusion Criteria

* Unexpected convention of VATS to open thoracotomy,or unexpected post-operative admission to ICU for continued ventilation
* Unable to understand the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) and Numerical Rating Scale(NRS)
* Allergy to or contraindications for amide local anesthetics,opioids,or NSAIDs
* Long-term treatment with opioids or corticosteroids (\>2 weeks)
* Drug use or substance abuse within the past 2 years
* Consuming more than 3 standard drinks per day (10g of alcohol,equivalent to 50g of Chinese high-alcohol liquor)
* Pre existing dementia that may interfere with perioperative assessment
* Contraindications for nerve block,including infection or tumor at the puncture site,definitively diagnosed diabetic peripheral neuropathy
* Suffering from severe hepatic insufficiency (Child-Pugh C),or severe renal insufficiency with dialysis,or severe heart failure (METS\<4)
* Pregnant or lactating women
* Previous thoracic surgeries (such an thoracic surgery or breast surgery),or preoperatively pathological pain conditions (e.g.,metastatic tumors,herpes zoster,etc)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

RenJi Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

zhisheng Lu

Role: CONTACT

+8618916951095

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

LY2025-199-A

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Regional Anesthesia Techniques in Breast Surgery
NCT06779656 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA