Pain Management in Response to Exparel vs. Standard Bupivicaine
NCT ID: NCT02499159
Last Updated: 2021-02-16
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-12-31
2017-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Patients will be randomly selected to received either Exparel or standard bupivicaine injection during surgery. Patients will be followed up to assess pain levels using a visual pain scale, and to assess how much pain medication was consumed.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Plain Bupivacaine After Intercostal Injections For Pain Management After Thoracoscopy
NCT03737292
A Randomized Trial of Exparel vs Saline in Opioid Reduction of Pain Management Following Lumbar Spine Surgeries.
NCT04644796
Liposomal Bupivacaine in Benign Soft Tissue Tumor Resection
NCT05082441
Study of EXPAREL in Patients Undergoing Breast Augmentation
NCT01582490
Bupivacaine/Epinephrine +Dexamethasone vs. Liposomal Bupivacaine
NCT03906617
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
It is the investigators' aim to follow their prior study with a randomized trial to compare local infiltration of liposomal bupivacaine at the conclusion of each procedure with injections of standard .25% bupivacaine.
Patients in group A will receive, at the end of the surgical procedure, injections of liposomal bupivacaine (Exparel) (266 mg, 20 mL, diluted at surgeon's discretion) into the thoracoscopic port incision sites and around the intercostal nerves serving that space.
Patients in group B will receive, at the end of the surgical procedure, injections of standard .25% bupivacaine into the thoracoscopic port incision sites and around the intercostal nerves serving that space.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Exparel
Liposomal Bupivicaine (Exparel) - 266 mg, 20 mL total, diluted at surgeon's discretion, Two doses of 10 mL each, into two separate incisions, delivered via 22 gauge needle.
Liposomal Bupivicaine
266 mg, 20 mL total, diluted at surgeon's discretion, delivered by 22 gauge needle.
0.25% standard bupivicaine
Bupivicaine - 0.25%, 20 mL total. Two doses of 10 mL each, into two separate incisions, delivered via 22 gauge needle.
0.25% standard bupivicaine
standard 0.25% bupivacaine, 20 mL total, delivered by 22 gauge needle.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Liposomal Bupivicaine
266 mg, 20 mL total, diluted at surgeon's discretion, delivered by 22 gauge needle.
0.25% standard bupivicaine
standard 0.25% bupivacaine, 20 mL total, delivered by 22 gauge needle.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Isolated thoracoscopic procedure for therapeutic or diagnostic purposes
Exclusion Criteria
* Need for operative pleurectomy or pleurodesis
* Chronic use of pain medication -narcotics or nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), sedatives, or hypnotics
* Allergies to bupivacaine or other local anesthetics, narcotics, NSAIDs or acetaminophen
* Liver dysfunction (INR \> 1.5, albumin \< 2.8g/dl, bilirubin \> 2mg/dl)
* Renal dysfunction (eGFR \< 60ml/min/1.73m2)
* History of peptic ulcerative disease
* Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) requiring continuous oxygen supplementation
* Inability to consent
* Pregnancy
* Need for conversion from a Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery procedure to a thoracotomy
* Patient is discharged from the hospital with a chest tube in place
* Patient fails to comply with post-operative instructions
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mednax National Medical Group
UNKNOWN
Inova Health Care Services
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sandeep J Khandhar, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Cardiac, Vascular, and Thoracic Surgery Associates
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cardiac, Vascular, and Thoracic Surgery Associates
Falls Church, Virginia, United States
Inova Fairfax Hospital
Falls Church, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Whitson BA, Groth SS, Duval SJ, Swanson SJ, Maddaus MA. Surgery for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review of the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy approaches to lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Dec;86(6):2008-16; discussion 2016-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.07.009.
Allen MS, Halgren L, Nichols FC 3rd, Cassivi SD, Harmsen WS, Wigle DA, Shen KR, Deschamps C. A randomized controlled trial of bupivacaine through intracostal catheters for pain management after thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Sep;88(3):903-10. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.04.139.
Chan VW, Chung F, Cheng DC, Seyone C, Chung A, Kirby TJ. Analgesic and pulmonary effects of continuous intercostal nerve block following thoracotomy. Can J Anaesth. 1991 Sep;38(6):733-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03008451.
Debreceni G, Molnar Z, Szelig L, Molnar TF. Continuous epidural or intercostal analgesia following thoracotomy: a prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2003 Oct;47(9):1091-5. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2003.00208.x.
Kaiser AM, Zollinger A, De Lorenzi D, Largiader F, Weder W. Prospective, randomized comparison of extrapleural versus epidural analgesia for postthoracotomy pain. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998 Aug;66(2):367-72. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(98)00448-2.
American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Acute Pain Management. Practice guidelines for acute pain management in the perioperative setting: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Acute Pain Management. Anesthesiology. 2004 Jun;100(6):1573-81. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200406000-00033. No abstract available.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
14-1656
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.