Erector Spinae Plane Block Catheters and Intrathecal Morphine for Hepatic Resection
NCT ID: NCT04849455
Last Updated: 2022-06-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE4
70 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-05-24
2023-05-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Intravenous(IV) vs. Erector Spinae Plane Blocks in Cardiac Surgery
NCT04995497
ESP Block VS Intrathecal Opioid After Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery
NCT05257941
Erector Spinae Plane Block with Dexmedetomidine and Bupivacain Versus Dexamethasone and Bupivacain for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgeries
NCT06658418
Spinal Anesthesia For Enhanced Recovery After Liver Surgery
NCT03715517
Comparing the Perioperative Analgesic Effect of Two Different Volumes of Local Anesthetic Solution in Erector Spinae Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy
NCT05813158
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Specific Aim: To determine if the addition of ESP catheters to multimodal pain regimen with intrathecal morphine, would provide superior postoperative analgesia beyond the morphine's twenty-four hour duration in patients undergoing hepatic resection compared to patients not receiving ESP catheters.
Hypothesis 1: Patients undergoing hepatic resection will have improved postoperative analgesia - based on mean opioid consumption and numeric rating scale pain scores - during postoperative day (POD) 1, as defined by 24 hours after intrathecal morphine, to POD 3 following surgery when receiving routine multimodal analgesia with intrathecal morphine and multimodal pain management with addition of ESP catheters versus multimodal analgesia with intrathecal morphine alone.
Hypothesis 2: Patients undergoing hepatic resection will have decreased incidence of persistent postoperative pain - based on mean opioid consumption and standard of care numeric rating scale pain scores during their hospital stay and at home- when receiving routine multimodal analgesia with intrathecal morphine with addition ESP catheters versus multimodal analgesia with intrathecal morphine alone.
This will be randomized, subject-masked, placebo-controlled, human subjects clinical trial.
Enrollment. Consenting adults undergoing hepatic resection will be offered enrollment. Study inclusion will be proposed to eligible patients prior to surgery. If a patient desires study participation, written, informed consent will be obtained using a current UCSD Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved Informed Consent Form (ICF). Selection for inclusion will not be based on gender, race, or socioeconomic status.
This will be a single-center (UCSD), randomized, controlled investigation.
Preoperative Procedures. Following written, informed consent, we will record baseline anthropomorphic information (age, sex, height, and weight) that is already provided by all patients having surgery. After consenting and prior to surgery, patients will be randomized (utilizing sealed envelopes with 1:1 ratio) to either intrathecal morphine and sham ESP catheters or intrathecal morphine and active ESP catheters. Currently the decision to place ESP catheters is at the discretion of the attending physician. The only difference for subjects participating in the study (vs those not participating) will be that the placement of ESP catheters and decision to activate them-currently standard-of-care and used daily at UCSD because of clinical equipoise-will be determined randomly, instead of the physician simply choosing him/herself.
Intrathecal morphine and sham ESP catheter group: In the preoperative holding area, all subjects in this cohort, will have a peripheral intravenous (IV) catheter inserted, standard noninvasive monitors applied, supplemental oxygen administered via a nasal cannula or face mask, and positioned sitting. Midazolam and fentanyl (IV) will be titrated for patient comfort, while ensuring that patients remain responsive to verbal cues. The area of insertion will be cleaned with iodine povacrylex and isopropyl alcohol (DuraPrep Surgical Prepping Solution, 3M St. Paul, MN USA), and a clear, sterile, fenestrated drape applied. After identifying with palpation the desired interspace using sterile techniques with the midline single shot spinal approach a 25g pencil point needle spinal needle is passed through an introducer needle. After free flow of cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) is established 300mcg of intrathecal morphine is slowly injected with additional aspiration of CSF at the midpoint and end of injection to confirm continued subarachnoid administration. Then bilateral T7-8 ESP catheters will be taped onto the patient's back after administration of local anesthetic at the site. The 0.2% ropivacaine infusions will be started at the ESP block catheter immediately after catheter insertion with a total rate of 0.1ml per hour.
Intrathecal morphine and ESP catheter group: Catheter insertion will adhere to current UCSD standard-of-care. In the preoperative holding area, all subjects in this cohort, will have a peripheral intravenous (IV) catheter inserted, standard noninvasive monitors applied, supplemental oxygen administered via a nasal cannula or face mask, and positioned sitting. In the preoperative holding area, all subjects in this cohort, will have a peripheral intravenous (IV) catheter inserted, standard noninvasive monitors applied, supplemental oxygen administered via a nasal cannula or face mask, and positioned sitting. Midazolam and fentanyl (IV) will be titrated for patient comfort, while ensuring that patients remain responsive to verbal cues. The area of insertion will be cleaned with iodine povacrylex and isopropyl alcohol (DuraPrep Surgical Prepping Solution, 3M St. Paul, MN USA), and a clear, sterile, fenestrated drape applied. After identifying with palpation the desired interspace using sterile techniques with the midline single shot spinal approach a 25g pencil point needle spinal needle is passed through an introducer needle. After free flow of CSF is established 300mcg (200mcg for age \>65yrs or respiratory concerns) of intrathecal morphine is slowly injected with additional aspiration of CSF at the midpoint and end of injection to confirm continued subarachnoid administration. Then bilateral T7-8 ESP catheters will be placed under ultrasound guidance. A catheter will be placed with saline with 1:200,000 of epinephrine. To confirm catheter location 15 mls of 1% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine will be injected and the block sensory level will be confirmed with ice. A total of 30mls of 1% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine will be used for bilateral catheter placement (15mls per side). A Ropivacaine 0.2% infusions will be started at the ESP block catheter immediately after catheter insertion with a total rate of 12mls per hour, 2mls/hr continuous infusion and 10ml set bolus every 120mins.
Additional Postoperative Pain Interventions: Intraoperatively the patient will have general anesthesia. Postoperatively, both groups will be started on the same multimodal oral regimen and followed by the Acute Pain Service (APS) as per APS standard of care.
Current Standard Care: Currently, all patients undergoing hepatic resection receive preoperative intrathecal morphine and at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist the patient may or may not receive ESP catheters as well as multimodal pain regimen managed by APS. Intraoperatively general anesthesia. The only difference for subjects participating in the study (vs those not participating) will be that they will be randomized to whether or not they get ESP catheters. We will ensure that there are no patient contraindications to either intervention.
Data collection: All data collection will be through standard UCSD nursing/therapy EPIC notes and patient interviews in-person during hospitalization or via telephone call.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Active Treatment
This group will receive a continuous erector spinae block catheter followed by an infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% at 10ml automatic set bolus per 120 minutes with 2ml/hr continuous infusion (14mls total every 2 hours per catheter)
0.2% ropivacaine local anesthetic continuous erector spinae plane block
Treatment- continuous erector spinae block catheter followed by an infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% at 10ml automatic set bolus per 60 minute with 2ml/hr continuous infusion (12mls/hr total per catheter)
Spinal Morphine
200-300 mcg of spinal morphine
Placebo
This group will receive a superficially placed (taped to the surface) erector spinae block catheter with a ropivacaine 0.2% infusion at 0.1ml /hr
0.2% ropivacaine local anesthetic superficially taped continuous erector spinae plane block
Placebo- Superficially placed (taped to the surface) erector spinae block catheter with a ropivacaine 0.2% infusion at 0.1ml /hr
Spinal Morphine
200-300 mcg of spinal morphine
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
0.2% ropivacaine local anesthetic continuous erector spinae plane block
Treatment- continuous erector spinae block catheter followed by an infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% at 10ml automatic set bolus per 60 minute with 2ml/hr continuous infusion (12mls/hr total per catheter)
0.2% ropivacaine local anesthetic superficially taped continuous erector spinae plane block
Placebo- Superficially placed (taped to the surface) erector spinae block catheter with a ropivacaine 0.2% infusion at 0.1ml /hr
Spinal Morphine
200-300 mcg of spinal morphine
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Admitting service requests APS consult
* \>18 years old and able to provide consent
Exclusion Criteria
* incarceration
* inability to communicate with the investigators and hospital staff
* severe hepatic disease
* chronic high-dose opioid use (defined as daily use for more than 4 weeks prior to surgery of at least the equivalent of 20 mg oxycodone);
* BMI \> 40 kg/m2
* allergy to study medications (lidocaine, ropivacaine)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of California, San Diego
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Engy T. Said, MD
Associate Clinical Professor, Anesthesiology.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Engy T Said, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of California, San Diego
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of California, San Diego
San Diego, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Engy M Said, MD
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
De Pietri L, Siniscalchi A, Reggiani A, Masetti M, Begliomini B, Gazzi M, Gerunda GE, Pasetto A. The use of intrathecal morphine for postoperative pain relief after liver resection: a comparison with epidural analgesia. Anesth Analg. 2006 Apr;102(4):1157-63. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000198567.85040.ce.
Nair S, McGuinness S, Masood F, Boylan JF, Conlon NP. Erector Spinae Plane Blocks in Major Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery: A Case Series. A A Pract. 2019 Nov 1;13(9):332-334. doi: 10.1213/XAA.0000000000001069.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
201661
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.