Ultra-Low-Flow Anesthesia and Carbon Footprint

NCT ID: NCT07313969

Last Updated: 2026-01-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

92 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-07-30

Study Completion Date

2026-01-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial evaluating the effects of ultra-low fresh gas flow (0.5 L/min) versus normal fresh gas flow (2.0 L/min) sevoflurane anesthesia in adult patients undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery. The study aims to determine whether ultra-low-flow anesthesia can be used safely to reduce volatile anesthetic consumption and environmental emissions without compromising hemodynamic stability or anesthetic depth.

Eligible adult patients scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or valve surgery under general anesthesia will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of two groups: ultra-low-flow (0.5 L/min) or normal-flow (2.0 L/min). All other anesthetic techniques, including induction drugs, ventilation parameters, temperature management, and perfusion strategies, will be standardized.

The primary outcome is the total amount of sevoflurane consumed per case. Secondary outcomes include intraoperative hemodynamic parameters (heart rate, mean arterial pressure), depth of anesthesia (BIS/MAC values), postoperative recovery times, and estimated carbon dioxide equivalent (CO₂e) emissions.

Outcome assessors and data analysts will remain blinded to group allocation. The findings of this study are expected to provide new evidence regarding the safety, efficiency, and environmental benefits of ultra-low-flow anesthesia techniques in cardiac surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This randomized controlled trial investigates the impact of ultra-low-flow (0.5 L/min) versus normal-flow (2.0 L/min) sevoflurane anesthesia on anesthetic consumption, intraoperative hemodynamics, and environmental footprint during on-pump cardiac surgery. Although low-flow anesthesia is known to reduce anesthetic agent use and greenhouse gas emissions, evidence regarding its safety and efficiency during cardiopulmonary bypass procedures remains limited.

Adult patients scheduled for elective CABG or valve surgery will be randomly assigned to either an ultra-low-flow or normal-flow group. Randomization will be performed using a computer-generated sequence with variable block sizes and allocation concealment via sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes. All participants will receive standardized induction, perfusion, and maintenance techniques according to institutional cardiac anesthesia protocols.

The primary outcome measure is total sevoflurane consumption per patient, assessed through vaporizer readings and anesthetic gas analyzer data. Secondary outcomes include intraoperative mean arterial pressure, heart rate, BIS/MAC values, body temperature, recovery characteristics, and calculated CO₂ equivalent emissions. Outcome assessors and data analysts will remain blinded to group allocation.

This study is designed to evaluate both clinical and ecological aspects of anesthetic practice. It aims to determine whether ultra-low-flow anesthesia can provide equivalent anesthetic quality while offering substantial reductions in agent consumption and environmental impact. The findings may contribute to establishing safer and more sustainable anesthesia standards for cardiac surgery.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Low Flow Anesthesia Sevoflurane Anesthesia Cardiac Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
Participants and postoperative outcome assessors will be blinded to group allocation. The anesthesia provider cannot be blinded due to visible gas flow settings; however, they will not be involved in postoperative data collection or analysis.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ultra-Low-Flow Group (0.5 L/min)

Sevoflurane anesthesia with fresh gas flow maintained at 0.5 L/min throughout the maintenance period. A 2 lt/min fresh gas flow will be used in the preoxygenation and intubation phase.

General anesthesia will be maintained with sevoflurane at a fresh gas flow rate of 0.5 L/min using an oxygen and air mixture. The flow rate will be kept constant from post-induction stabilization until the end of the surgery. Ventilation will be paused during cardiopulmonary bypass.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

ultra low flow anesthesia

Intervention Type DRUG

General anesthesia will be maintained with sevoflurane at a fresh gas flow rate of 0.5 L/min using oxygen and air mixture. The flow rate will be kept constant from post-induction stabilization until the end of cardiopulmonary bypass.

Normal-Flow Group (2.0 L/min)

Sevoflurane anesthesia with fresh gas flow maintained at 2.0 L/min throughout maintenance period. The flow rate will be kept constant from post-induction stabilization until the end of surgery. Ventilation will be paused during cardiopulmonary bypass

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

normal flow anesthesia

Intervention Type DRUG

General anesthesia will be maintained with sevoflurane at a fresh gas flow rate of 2.0 L/min using oxygen and air mixture. The flow rate will be kept constant from post-induction stabilization until the end of cardiopulmonary bypass.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ultra low flow anesthesia

General anesthesia will be maintained with sevoflurane at a fresh gas flow rate of 0.5 L/min using oxygen and air mixture. The flow rate will be kept constant from post-induction stabilization until the end of cardiopulmonary bypass.

Intervention Type DRUG

normal flow anesthesia

General anesthesia will be maintained with sevoflurane at a fresh gas flow rate of 2.0 L/min using oxygen and air mixture. The flow rate will be kept constant from post-induction stabilization until the end of cardiopulmonary bypass.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients aged 18-80 years
* Scheduled for elective on-pump CABG or valve surgery
* ASA physical status II-III
* Written informed consent obtained

Exclusion Criteria

* Emergency surgery
* Severe hepatic or renal dysfunction
* Known allergy to volatile anesthetics
* Significant pulmonary disease (e.g., COPD with GOLD III-IV)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ankara Etlik City Hospital

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ekin Guran, MD

consultant anesthesiologist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Etlik City Hospital

Ankara, Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

McGain F, Sheridan N, Wickramarachchi K, Yates S, Chan B, McAlister S. Carbon Footprint of General, Regional, and Combined Anesthesia for Total Knee Replacements. Anesthesiology. 2021 Dec 1;135(6):976-991. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003967.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34529033 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Ultra_low_flow

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Low-Flow Anesthesia and Open-Heart Surgery
NCT07040735 NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Minimal Flow Anesthesia and Infection Risk
NCT07092046 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA