High vs. Low Flow Sevoflurane Anesthesia in Pediatric Laparoscopic Surgery: Recovery, Hemodynamics, and Cost Comparison
NCT ID: NCT06676969
Last Updated: 2025-01-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
50 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-05-01
2024-10-07
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Feasibility and Safety Properties of Metabolic Flow Anesthesia Driven by Automated Gas Control in Pediatric Patients
NCT05644340
Cerebral and Peripheral Near Infrared Spectroscopy Monitoring in Low and High Flow Anaesthesia in Pediatric
NCT06320743
Comparison of Target Controlled Infusion Anesthesia and Inhalation Anesthesia in Pediatric Laparoscopic Surgeries
NCT06571682
Effects of Different Fresh Gas Flows on Carboxyhemoglobin Levels and Postoperative Patient Outcomes in Pediatric Cardiovascular Surgery
NCT06097806
Low and Moderete Flow Anaesthesia on Haemodynamics
NCT06871371
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The application of low-flow anesthesia reduces the consumption of anesthetic gases, decreases the cost of anesthesia, minimizes contamination of the working environment and atmosphere with anesthetic gases, preserves the respiratory physiology of the patient, and minimizes heat and humidity loss by heating and humidifying the gases delivered to the patient, thereby better maintaining the physiology of the trachea and bronchial environments. The heating of gases is also beneficial for maintaining body temperature and preventing postoperative hypothermia. Additionally, due to the requirement for close monitoring, anesthesia safety is increased .
In pediatric patients, due to their different anatomical and physiological characteristics compared to adults, the application of low fresh gas flow anesthesia can be more challenging. This is especially the case when using uncuffed endotracheal tubes, where leaks may occur in the respiratory system, and the breathing circuits used may increase dead space. However, studies have shown that with appropriate techniques and adequate monitoring, these potential problems can be prevented, and low-flow anesthesia can be safely applied in children with close monitoring.
In our study, the investigators aim to compare the effects of different flow rates on postoperative recovery, hemodynamic factors, and costs in children, and to demonstrate that low-flow anesthesia can be applied as safely as high-flow anesthesia in pediatric patients. The investigators believe our study will contribute significantly to the literature on this topic.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Low flow
Low flow Anestesia
No interventions assigned to this group
High Flow
High Flow Anestesia
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Elective laparoscopic surgeries expected to last longer than 30 minutes but shorter than 180 minutes
Exclusion Criteria
Patients whose relatives are unable to provide informed consent. Patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification higher than II.
1 Month
12 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ondokuz Mayıs University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sibel Barış
Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
19 Mayis Üniversitesi Tip Fakültesi
Samsun, , Turkey (Türkiye)
19 Mayıs Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi
Samsun, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Isik Y, Goksu S, Kocoglu H, Oner U. Low flow desflurane and sevoflurane anaesthesia in children. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2006 Jan;23(1):60-4. doi: 10.1017/S026502150500178X.
Park SY, Chung CJ, Jang JH, Bae JY, Choi SR. The safety and efficacy of minimal-flow desflurane anesthesia during prolonged laparoscopic surgery. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012 Dec;63(6):498-503. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2012.63.6.498. Epub 2012 Dec 14.
Glenski TA, Levine L. The implementation of low-flow anesthesia at a tertiary pediatric center: A quality improvement initiative. Paediatr Anaesth. 2020 Oct;30(10):1139-1145. doi: 10.1111/pan.13994. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
Meakin GH. Low-flow anaesthesia in infants and children. Br J Anaesth. 1999 Jul;83(1):50-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/83.1.50. No abstract available.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Related Info
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
High/Low flow Anestesia
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.