Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Algorithms to Optimize the Performance and Delivery of Acute Dialysis
NCT ID: NCT07312929
Last Updated: 2026-01-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
7500 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2026-06-01
2031-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Hypothesis:
Can the investigators develop and implement Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Algorithms into Clinical Information Systems to Optimize the Prescription, Delivery, and Performance of Acute Dialysis?
Objective(s):
1. Identify variables surrounding identified Key Performance Indicators that may be used by Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence algorithms to optimize the prescription and performance of acute dialysis.
2. Develop Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence algorithms to help guide the prescription and delivery of acute dialysis in the development of Clinical Decision Support tools and Best Practice Advisories and create a ML/AI Augmented SMART DIALYSIS Digital Dashboard.
3. Implement and evaluate the performance of the developed Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence algorithms on patient-centered and health economic outcomes.
4. Validate and benchmark the performance of the evaluated Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence algorithms across multiple jurisdictions.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
AI-Driven Prediction of Dialysis Outcome With EHR
NCT06791447
Incremental Dialysis Decision Model Based on Expert-Guided Machine Learning
NCT06775067
Effect of Sodium and UF Profiling on Dialysis
NCT06213129
Behavioral AI to Predict and Increase Peritoneal Dialysis Uptake
NCT06533254
Artificial Intelligence: a New Alternative to Analyse CKD-MBD in Hemodialysis
NCT02697578
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Acute dialysis is required in approximately 10-15% of all patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). Acute dialysis may take the form of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) or slow-low efficiency dialysis (SLED). Worldwide, CRRT remains the predominant form of acute dialysis, with over 75% of acute dialysis being CRRT.
The application of acute dialysis in the ICU is associated with poor patient outcomes. Despite advances in medical technology and care, mortality remains between 40-60%, which is similar to outcomes observed with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Additionally, even when patients survive their critical illness, up to 10% of patients require ongoing long-term chronic dialysis therapy. This has a significant effect on the quality of life of survivors of critical illness, as well as important effects on their families, often requiring changes in work and housing status, as well as relocation to sites in closer proximity to dialysis centres. This results in not only significant healthcare and social costs (approximately $100,000/patient/year in Alberta, Canada), but also very important reductions in the health-related quality of lives for these patients. Currently, while evidence exist regarding the optimal initiation of acute dialysis, there is a paucity of evidence to predict timing of modality transition or liberation from this therapy. Using a completely integrated electronic Clinical Information System (eCIS) such as Connect Care (EPIC, Wisconsin, USA) in Alberta, the investigators can develop predictive algorithms that may anticipate patient and acute dialysis needs.
Once, acute dialysis is initiated, several factors may affect kidney recovery following acute dialysis. Intra-dialytic hypotension has been identified as a leading modifiable factor, but unfortunately, one where clinicians have limited capacity to accurately predict. This is an important knowledge gap that must be addressed. It has also been previously identified by our study team as one of the most important key performance indicators (KPI) for acute dialysis, especially in IHD and SLED. For CRRT, filter life has been identified as the most important and studied KPI. Both of these KPIs are currently being utilized by the ongoing QUALITY CRRT and DIALYZING WISELY programs to improve the performance and delivery of acute dialysis to critically ill patients. These two programs have been successfully implemented across Alberta and have established the infrastructure necessary to initiate the next steps in these Continuous Quality Initiatives for acute dialysis, the SMART DIALYSIS program.
Recently, advances in computer and machine processing have led to the 4th industrial revolution featuring the development of smart machines, devices, and learning algorithms that can aid humans in the management of patients and optimize the delivery of healthcare. Machine Learning (ML) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms have been previously used in medicine, but have only begun their implementation into critical care nephrology.
Current initiatives are primarily focused on pattern recognition and risk prediction. This program will contain 4 distinct phases.
In Phase 1, the investigators will continue work from our QUALITY CRRT and DIALYZING WISELY program and will aim to better understand the landscape surrounding decisions around transitions between acute dialysis modalities, termination, and attempts at liberation from acute dialysis, the incidence of intra-dialytic hypotension, and timing of filter clotting in the ICU.
In Phase 2, the investigators will develop models and subsequent Clinical Decision Support (CDS) tools and/or Best Practice Advisories (BPAs) for clinicians to better predict and manage 1) transitions between acute dialysis therapies, 2) management of intra-dialytic hypotension, 3) prediction of filter life and 4) liberation from acute dialysis. Concurrent with this work, we will work to develop an AI/ML Augmented Acute Dialysis Dashboard (i.e., SMART DIALYSIS Digital Dashboard) embedded within our electronic Clinical Information System (eCIS) to present these KPIs to clinicians.
Phase 3 will look into implementing and evaluating the performance and acceptability of these ML/AI algorithms in clinical practice.
Finally, Phase 4 will take our Alberta-derived results and look to implement and benchmark these across other large healthcare authorities to ensure that the algorithms have been developed and validated appropriately and ethically. These will include partners across Canada, the US, Europe and Australia and New Zealand.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Critically ill patients requiring acute dialysis
Admitted to an intensive care unit; requiring acute dialysis
intermittent OR continuous renal replacement therapies
We will include any critically ill patient admitted to an intensive care unit requiring acute dialysis.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
intermittent OR continuous renal replacement therapies
We will include any critically ill patient admitted to an intensive care unit requiring acute dialysis.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
Pre-existing end-stage kidney disease.
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Alberta
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Oleksa Rewa
Associate Professor, Director of Research & Innovation
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Oleksa G Rewa, MD MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Alberta
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Pro00160780
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.