Protein-bound Uremic Retention Solutes and Long Nocturnal Hemodialysis: a Longitudinal Analysis

NCT ID: NCT00417339

Last Updated: 2016-05-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

38 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-12-31

Study Completion Date

2014-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Study on intradialytic kinetics of protein-bound uremic retention solutes during long nocturnal hemodialysis

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Although remarkable progress has been made, chronic kidney disease still poses a major burden on both individual patients, as well as on society as a whole. There is a strong inverse relationship between decreasing renal function, as estimated by glomerular filtration rate, and mortality rate, especially death due to cardiovascular disease. The exact cause(s) remain to be elucidated. Uremic toxins might play an important role.

In the course of decreasing renal function the concentration of numerous intracellular and extracellular compounds vary from the non-uremic state. A still increasing number of uremic retention solutes are being identified. Renal replacement strategies aim to remove potentially harmful substances from the body. Traditionally much attention has been paid to small water-soluble molecules such as urea nitrogen and creatinine. Based on the results of the recent HEMO and ADEMEX studies, increases of small water-soluble solute removal above the level reached with modern dialysis techniques (HD, PD) seem not to be advantageous with regard to patient outcome. These findings may point to the importance of other distinct groups of uremic retention solutes. In view of the data described above, protein-bound solutes might be good candidates.

Several advantages of long duration hemodialysis have been observed, including a better control of blood pressure by decreasing extracellular fluid volume, lowering peripheral vascular resistance and improving endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilation. A normalization of heart rate variability and improvement of left-ventricular function was noted as well. Furthermore, anemia control has been shown to be easier and several nutritional parameters improved in patients treated with long duration HD. The therapy results in higher small water-soluble solute removal, phosphate removal and greater elimination of larger molecules (e.g. β2-microglobulin).

It seems an appealing question whether a better control of the serum levels of protein-bound solutes can be achieved by long duration (nocturnal) hemodialysis. This might be another advantage of this therapeutic modality, or may even in part explain the better outcome of patients treated this way.

The study compares intermittent hemodialysis with long nocturnal hemodialysis with respect to serum concentrations of several protein bound uremic toxins, as well as solute removal.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

End Stage Kidney Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

hemodialysis, 4h, twice weekly

hemodialysis, four hours, twice weekly

hemodialysis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

individualised

hemodialysis, 8h, twice weekly

hemodialysis, eight hours, twice weekly

hemodialysis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

individualised

hemodialysis, 8h, every other day

hemodialysis, eight hours, every other day

hemodialysis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

individualised

hemodialysis, 8h, six days per week

hemodialysis, eight hours, six days per week

hemodialysis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

individualised

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

hemodialysis

individualised

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Start hemodialysis during 2007
* Age over 18 years
* Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Non consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Björn Meijers

Prof

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Björn KI Meijers, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

Pieter Evenepoel, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

Tom Dejagere, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Virga Jesse Ziekenhuis

Nigel Toussaint, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Geelong Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Monash Medical Centre

Clayton, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Geelong Hospital

Geelong, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven

Leuven, Brabant, Belgium

Site Status

Virga Jesseziekenhuis

Hasselt, Limburg, Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Australia Belgium

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bammens B, Evenepoel P, Keuleers H, Verbeke K, Vanrenterghem Y. Free serum concentrations of the protein-bound retention solute p-cresol predict mortality in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2006 Mar;69(6):1081-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5000115.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16421516 (View on PubMed)

Fagugli RM, De Smet R, Buoncristiani U, Lameire N, Vanholder R. Behavior of non-protein-bound and protein-bound uremic solutes during daily hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002 Aug;40(2):339-47. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2002.34518.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12148107 (View on PubMed)

Pierratos A. Daily nocturnal home hemodialysis. Kidney Int. 2004 May;65(5):1975-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00603.x. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15086951 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NHD002

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.