Ultrafiltration Profiling and Outcomes Among Individuals on Maintenance Hemodialysis
NCT ID: NCT03301740
Last Updated: 2020-05-15
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
34 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-03-12
2018-12-18
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study investigates the comparative effect of UF profiling versus non-profiled conventional HD on select cardiovascular and patient-reported outcomes. Participants will complete two phases of UF profiling and two phases of conventional HD and will act as their own controls.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Association of Survival in Impact of Ultrafiltration Rates in Hemodialysis Patients
NCT03471299
Using Intradialytic Blood Pressure Slopes to Guide Ultrafiltration
NCT03303391
Understand the Difference Between Clinical Measured UF and Real UF.
NCT03864120
Effect of Sodium and UF Profiling on Dialysis
NCT06213129
Transcapillary Plasma Refill in Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease
NCT03348488
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
UF Profiling Phase First
First treatment phase begins with linear UF profiling during HD.
Participants randomized to starting with the experimental UF profiling phase will receive 9 HD treatments with UF profiling (1st experimental phase). Following a 3 conventional HD treatment wash-out period, participants will then cross over to 9 conventional HD treatments (1st control phase). Following a 2nd 3 conventional HD treatment wash-out period, participants will cross over to 9 HD treatments with UF profiling (2nd experimental phase). Following a 3rd conventional HD treatment wash-out period, participants will cross over to 9 conventional HD treatments (2nd control phase).
UF profiling during HD
Experimental arm: Linear UF profiling (linearly decreasing UF rate with a UF rate starting at 1.33 times the rate that would be needed at a constant UF rate to achieve the desired post-weight; pre-programmed "profile 2" on a Fresenius 2008K machine, the machine used in all participating clinics). Ultrafiltration profiling will be performed using Fresenius 2008K dialysis machines in accordance with manufacturer instructions.
Conventional HD
Control arm: Conventional HD (routine care) is the participant's standard HD prescription without UF profiling.
Conventional HD Phase First
First treatment phase begins with conventional HD.
Participants randomized to starting with the control conventional HD phase will receive 9 conventional HD treatments (1st control phase). Following a 3 conventional HD treatment wash-out period, participants will then cross over to 9 HD treatments with UF profiling (1st experimental phase). Following a 2nd 3 conventional HD treatment wash-out period, participants will cross over to 9 conventional HD treatments (2nd control phase). Following a 3rd conventional HD treatment wash-out period, participants will cross over to 9 HD treatments with UF profiling (2nd experimental phase).
UF profiling during HD
Experimental arm: Linear UF profiling (linearly decreasing UF rate with a UF rate starting at 1.33 times the rate that would be needed at a constant UF rate to achieve the desired post-weight; pre-programmed "profile 2" on a Fresenius 2008K machine, the machine used in all participating clinics). Ultrafiltration profiling will be performed using Fresenius 2008K dialysis machines in accordance with manufacturer instructions.
Conventional HD
Control arm: Conventional HD (routine care) is the participant's standard HD prescription without UF profiling.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
UF profiling during HD
Experimental arm: Linear UF profiling (linearly decreasing UF rate with a UF rate starting at 1.33 times the rate that would be needed at a constant UF rate to achieve the desired post-weight; pre-programmed "profile 2" on a Fresenius 2008K machine, the machine used in all participating clinics). Ultrafiltration profiling will be performed using Fresenius 2008K dialysis machines in accordance with manufacturer instructions.
Conventional HD
Control arm: Conventional HD (routine care) is the participant's standard HD prescription without UF profiling.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age 18-85 years
* Ability to converse comfortably in English or Spanish
* Receipt of in-center maintenance HD at Carolina Dialysis clinics in Carrboro or Siler City, North Carolina
* ≥90 days on HD
* Free of bloodstream infection during screening period
* Willingness to undergo all study testing
* Evidence of a signed and dated informed consent document
Exclusion Criteria
* \>1 hospitalization during screening period
* Unstable angina per treating nephrologist
* End-stage cirrhosis per treating nephrologist
* New York Heart Association class IV heart failure per treating nephrologist
* Pregnant
* More than 4 times per week HD
* Incarcerated
* Anticipated kidney transplant within 6 months per treating nephrologist
* Non-adherence to HD prescription (\>2 unexplained absences during screening period)
* Sodium profiling or UF profiling in standard HD prescription
* Decisionally challenged, unable to provide informed consent
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
NIH
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jennifer Flythe, MD, MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Carolina Dialysis - Carrboro
Carrboro, North Carolina, United States
Carolina Dialysis - Siler City
Siler City, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Flythe JE, Tugman MJ, Narendra JH, Assimon MM, Li Q, Wang Y, Brunelli SM, Hinderliter AL. Effect of ultrafiltration profiling on outcomes among maintenance hemodialysis patients: a pilot randomized crossover trial. J Nephrol. 2021 Feb;34(1):113-123. doi: 10.1007/s40620-020-00862-6. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
17-1057
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.