Comparison of Post- and Pre-dilutional Hemodiafiltration in Hemodialysis Patients

NCT ID: NCT03288285

Last Updated: 2019-04-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

49 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-09-01

Study Completion Date

2019-04-07

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Hemodiafiltration (HDF) is a choice of treatment modalities for patients with end-stage renal disease. Hemodiafiltration, combining diffusion and convection, may increase removal of large and middle molecule uremic toxins comparing to conventional hemodialysis. The techniques of hemodiafiltration include pre-dilution and post-dilution according to the infusion site of substitution fluid. Post-dilution HDF is most widely used because of higher removal rate of uremic toxins. However, hemoconcentration and clotting of membrane limit its further clearance of toxins. Pre-dilution may preserve membrane permeability and maintain hemodynamic status. Although lower clearance of small molecule uremic toxins, one study in Japan showed survival benefits of pre-dilution HDF, comparing to post-dilution HDF. The aim of this study was to compare pre-dilution and post-dilution HDF in terms of their clinical and biological parameters and clearance of uremic toxins by using cross-over study design.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

1. Study design: randomly assigned, cross-over study.
2. Patient number: 60.
3. Inclusion criteria: stable patients end-stage renal disease who were older than 20 years and received thrice-weekly standard hemodialysis for more than 3 months were recruited.
4. Exclusion criteria: active systemic disease, liver cirrhosis, active malignancy, receiving immunosuppressive treatment, dialysis with temporal non-tunneled catheter, inadequate dialysis dose (single-pooled Kt/V\<1.2).
5. Methods:

Prior to randomization, a Charlson Comorbidity Index score and baseline characteristics are recorded for each patient. Each patient who received HDF prior to study will received one-month high-flux hemodialysis with target single-pooled Kt/V\>1.2 for washout. The baseline characteristics of each patient including dialyzer, dialysis time, blood flow, dialysate flow, replacement volume, pre- and post-dialysis blood pressure and body weight were recorded. The follow-up laboratory data will also be collected: predialysis C-reactive protein, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, bicarbonate, sodium, potassium, uric acid, albumin, calcium, phosphate, intact parathyroid hormone, β2-microglobulin, prolactin, fibroblast growth factor 23, α1-microglobulin, indoxyl sulfate, p-cresol sulfate, advance oxidation protein products, advance glycation product, percentage of proinflammatory monocytes; interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-α, hematocrit, transferrin saturation and ferritin. Urea kinetics including kt/V, Urea reduction ratio and normalized protein catabolic rate are calculated. We also used Physical Symptoms Distress Scale for life quality measurement.

After randomization, two group received standard prescription of pre- and post-dilution HDF. The prescribed convective volume per treatment of post-dilution mode is based on blood flow, filtration fraction and hematocrit to achieved current recommendation of 23 liter/1.73m2. The convective volume of pre-dilution mode will be at least twice higher than the desired dose in post-dilution mode for each patient. After 3-month stable hemodiafiltration, parameters mentioned above will also be checked. Two group will be switched for another 3-month course and then switch again. The total following time is 12 months.
6. Outcome: The primary objective is to compare the removal of a wide spectrum of solutes such as middle and protein-bound molecules. Secondary outcomes are intradialytic tolerance, including intradialytic hypotension, cramps and arrhythmia, and life quality measurements.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hemodiafiltration

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CROSSOVER

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* stable patients end-stage renal disease who were older than 20 years and received thrice-weekly standard hemodialysis for more than 3 months were recruited.

Exclusion Criteria

* active systemic disease, liver cirrhosis, malignancy, receiving immunosuppressive treatment, dialysis with temporal non-tunneled catheter, inadequate dialysis dose (kt/V\<1.2).
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Tungs' Taichung Metroharbour Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Chang-Hsu Chen, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Tungs' Taichung Metroharbour Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tungs' Taichung Metroharbour Hospital

Taichung, , Taiwan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

106042

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Brain Swelling During Dialysis
NCT01396863 COMPLETED NA