Green Dialysis: Dialysis With Reduced Dialysate Flow

NCT ID: NCT05974436

Last Updated: 2023-11-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

10 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-07-18

Study Completion Date

2023-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Hemodialysis patients consume per year 18.720-26.208L of dialysis fluid (i.e. water). From an ecological point of view, the present study investigated whether reducing this water amount has an impact on the extraction and total solute removal of different uremic toxins. The efficiency of hemodiafiltration with a standard high-flux dialyzer is compared to hemodialysis with a medium cut-off dialyzer with a dialysate flow of either 700mL/min or 300mL/min.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Hemodialysis is currently performed with dialysate flows in the range 500 and 700mL/min respectively in hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration mode. With a standard daytime dialysis scheme of three times four hours a week, each patient consumes up to 360-504L dialysate per week or 18.720-26.208L per year.

From an ecological point of view, one can wonder whether patients can be dialyzed adequately enough using hemodialysis mode with a lower dialysate flow, and as such consuming less water.

Changing the mode from hemodiafiltration to hemodialysis mainly has an impact on the removal of larger toxins which benefit of the convective transport. Lowering dialysate flow in hemodialysis mode mainly has an impact on the removal of small water soluble toxins which are mainly removed by diffusion. For this transport, different parameters are important: blood and dialysate flow, dimensions of the membrane (surface area and thickness), fiber diameter, and extra-luminal space, and membrane porosity (Sieving coefficient). This also implies that, for the same blood and dialysate flow, the choice of the dialyzer will determine toxin transport. The use of a medium cut-off membrane with smaller and more open fibers might thus be more adequate in hemodialysis mode than a standard high-flux dialyzer with wider fibers.

The aim of this study is to quantify instant extraction and overall total solute removal of representative uremic toxins in hemodiafiltration with a standard high-flux hemodialyzer versus hemodialysis with a medium cut-off membrane, either with a standard or reduced dialysate flow.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Uremic Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Hemodiafiltration with high-flux dialyzer

Patients are dialysed at midweek using hemodiafiltration (autoflow) with an FX800 Cordiax high-flux dialyzer, with dialysate flow of 700mL/min

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Blood and dialysate sampling

Intervention Type OTHER

Blood is sampled from the inlet and outlet dialyzer bloodline at 5min after dialysis start.

Spent dialysate is sampled from the outlet dialysate line at 5, 30, 90 and 240min after dialysis start.

Blood and dialysate samples are analysed for different uremic toxins. Dialysis efficiency is calculated from the analysed toxin concentrations.

Hemodialysis with medium cut-off dialyzer and high dialysate flow

Patients are dialysed at midweek using hemodialysis with a Theranova 400 medium cut-off dialyzer with dialysate flow of 700mL/min

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Blood and dialysate sampling

Intervention Type OTHER

Blood is sampled from the inlet and outlet dialyzer bloodline at 5min after dialysis start.

Spent dialysate is sampled from the outlet dialysate line at 5, 30, 90 and 240min after dialysis start.

Blood and dialysate samples are analysed for different uremic toxins. Dialysis efficiency is calculated from the analysed toxin concentrations.

Hemodialysis with medium cut-off dialyzer and low dialysate flow

Patients are dialysed at midweek using hemodialysis with a Theranova 400 medium cut-off dialyzer with dialysate flow of 300mL/min

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Blood and dialysate sampling

Intervention Type OTHER

Blood is sampled from the inlet and outlet dialyzer bloodline at 5min after dialysis start.

Spent dialysate is sampled from the outlet dialysate line at 5, 30, 90 and 240min after dialysis start.

Blood and dialysate samples are analysed for different uremic toxins. Dialysis efficiency is calculated from the analysed toxin concentrations.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Blood and dialysate sampling

Blood is sampled from the inlet and outlet dialyzer bloodline at 5min after dialysis start.

Spent dialysate is sampled from the outlet dialysate line at 5, 30, 90 and 240min after dialysis start.

Blood and dialysate samples are analysed for different uremic toxins. Dialysis efficiency is calculated from the analysed toxin concentrations.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* stable chronic hemodialysis patient
* well functioning vascular access

Exclusion Criteria

* active infection
* malignancies
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Ghent

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Van Biesen, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Ghent

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ghent University Hospital

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ONZ-2023-0170

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

How to Prevent Complications During Dialysis
NCT06962124 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA