Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
10 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-07-18
2023-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Expanded Hemodialysis Versus High-Volume Online Hemodiafiltration for Uremic Toxin Removal
NCT07348536
Prevention and Management of Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Complications in Maintenance Hemodialysis (MHD) Patients
NCT07335471
Solute Removal With High Volume Hemodiafiltration Versus Long High Flux Hemodialysis
NCT01445366
The Benefit of Оn-Line High Convection Volume Hemodiafiltration Treatment Versus High Flow Dialysis on Reduction of Oxidative Stress and Health Related Quality of Life in Dialysis Patients
NCT02673099
Hemodynamic Efficiency of an Hemodialysis Treatment With High Permeability in Post-resuscitation Shock
NCT00780299
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
From an ecological point of view, one can wonder whether patients can be dialyzed adequately enough using hemodialysis mode with a lower dialysate flow, and as such consuming less water.
Changing the mode from hemodiafiltration to hemodialysis mainly has an impact on the removal of larger toxins which benefit of the convective transport. Lowering dialysate flow in hemodialysis mode mainly has an impact on the removal of small water soluble toxins which are mainly removed by diffusion. For this transport, different parameters are important: blood and dialysate flow, dimensions of the membrane (surface area and thickness), fiber diameter, and extra-luminal space, and membrane porosity (Sieving coefficient). This also implies that, for the same blood and dialysate flow, the choice of the dialyzer will determine toxin transport. The use of a medium cut-off membrane with smaller and more open fibers might thus be more adequate in hemodialysis mode than a standard high-flux dialyzer with wider fibers.
The aim of this study is to quantify instant extraction and overall total solute removal of representative uremic toxins in hemodiafiltration with a standard high-flux hemodialyzer versus hemodialysis with a medium cut-off membrane, either with a standard or reduced dialysate flow.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Hemodiafiltration with high-flux dialyzer
Patients are dialysed at midweek using hemodiafiltration (autoflow) with an FX800 Cordiax high-flux dialyzer, with dialysate flow of 700mL/min
Blood and dialysate sampling
Blood is sampled from the inlet and outlet dialyzer bloodline at 5min after dialysis start.
Spent dialysate is sampled from the outlet dialysate line at 5, 30, 90 and 240min after dialysis start.
Blood and dialysate samples are analysed for different uremic toxins. Dialysis efficiency is calculated from the analysed toxin concentrations.
Hemodialysis with medium cut-off dialyzer and high dialysate flow
Patients are dialysed at midweek using hemodialysis with a Theranova 400 medium cut-off dialyzer with dialysate flow of 700mL/min
Blood and dialysate sampling
Blood is sampled from the inlet and outlet dialyzer bloodline at 5min after dialysis start.
Spent dialysate is sampled from the outlet dialysate line at 5, 30, 90 and 240min after dialysis start.
Blood and dialysate samples are analysed for different uremic toxins. Dialysis efficiency is calculated from the analysed toxin concentrations.
Hemodialysis with medium cut-off dialyzer and low dialysate flow
Patients are dialysed at midweek using hemodialysis with a Theranova 400 medium cut-off dialyzer with dialysate flow of 300mL/min
Blood and dialysate sampling
Blood is sampled from the inlet and outlet dialyzer bloodline at 5min after dialysis start.
Spent dialysate is sampled from the outlet dialysate line at 5, 30, 90 and 240min after dialysis start.
Blood and dialysate samples are analysed for different uremic toxins. Dialysis efficiency is calculated from the analysed toxin concentrations.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Blood and dialysate sampling
Blood is sampled from the inlet and outlet dialyzer bloodline at 5min after dialysis start.
Spent dialysate is sampled from the outlet dialysate line at 5, 30, 90 and 240min after dialysis start.
Blood and dialysate samples are analysed for different uremic toxins. Dialysis efficiency is calculated from the analysed toxin concentrations.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* well functioning vascular access
Exclusion Criteria
* malignancies
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Ghent
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Van Biesen, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Ghent
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ghent University Hospital
Ghent, , Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ONZ-2023-0170
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.