RandomizEd ClinicAL triaL on the Efficacy and saFety of Incremental Hemodialysis (REAL-LIFE)

NCT ID: NCT04360694

Last Updated: 2024-06-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

190 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-05-10

Study Completion Date

2026-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background: The thrice-weekly hemodialysis (HD) regimen is widely accepted as a standard prescription. The concept of incremental dialysis has been established as a possible alternative for patients with preserved diuresis and end-stage renal failure in need of HD. The main problems related to prescription of incremental HD are an arbitrary use of infrequent regimens and the lack of clear standards for incorporating residual kidney function (RKF) in the assessment of HD dose. Several models have been proposed for prescription of incremental dialysis. The latest, the variable target model (VTM), gives more clinical weight to the RKF and allows less frequent HD treatments at lower RKF. Despite increasing evidence derived from observational studies to support the use of incremental HD, RCTs are lacking and, therefore, urgently needed.

Methods/Design:

The Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation of the Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico, Bari, Italy and the EUDIAL Working Group of the European Renal Association - European Dialysis Transplant Association (ERA-EDTA) are starting a randomized clinical trial (RCT) in incident HD patients, whose name is "REAL LIFE", by using the acronym of its whole definition: RandomizEd clinicAL triaL on the effIcacy and saFety of incremental haEmodialysis. REAL LIFE is a pragmatic, prospective, multicentre, open label RCT, investigator-initiated, comparing the intervention arm (incremental HD) with the control arm (standard 3HD/wk). The trial, originally conceived by experts at the Division of Nephrology of the Miulli General Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Italy, consists in starting the HD treatment adopting the new incremental approach guided by the VTM. The primary outcome is the survival of kidney function, with the event defined as urinary output (UO) ≤ 200 mL/day, confirmed by a further collection after 2 weeks to exclude temporary illness.

Discussion: REAL LIFE will enable the investigators to know with the highest level of scientific evidence the safety and efficacy of an incremental approach to the start of HD treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The majority of dialysis patients starting hemodialysis (HD) are currently treated with a fixed dose thrice-weekly HD (3HD/wk). The 3HD/wk regimen has been assumed, until recently, almost as a dogma in the dialysis community. Incremental HD is based on the simple idea of adjusting its dose according to the metrics of RKF. REAL LIFE is a pragmatic, prospective, multicentre, open label RCT, investigator-initiated, comparing the intervention arm (incremental HD) with the control arm (standard 3HD/wk). A Variable Target Model (VTM) has been suggested, which gives more clinical weight to the RKF and allows less frequent HD treatments in patients with lower RKF. The investigators recommend to start and keep on with once-weekly HD, which should be possible until residual renal urea clearance (KRU) falls below 2.5 - 3.0 mL/min/35 L, i.e., glomerular filtration rate (GFR) ≈ 4 mL/min/1.73 m2.

The primary outcome is the survival of kidney function, with the event defined as urinary output (UO) ≤ 200 mL/day, confirmed by a further collection after 2 weeks to exclude temporary illness. Secondary outcomes are: composite primary cardiovascular endpoint (cardiovascular death, non fatal myocardial infarction and/or or non fatal stroke); intima-media thickness of the carotid arteries; specific cardiomyopathy control; RKF preservation; patients survival; hospital admissions; anemia control; mineral and bone disorder control, and middle molecules removal.

The sample size calculation is based on the primary outcome "presence of anuria". The assumptions for calculating the sample size, derived from data of Teruel Briones et al., are the following:

* Percentage of subjects who developed anuria in the experimental group (incremental HD): 25%
* Percentage of subjects who developed anuria in the control group (standard 3HD/wk): 51%
* Power: 0.8
* Ratio: 1:1
* Non-compliance: 20%
* Total expected sample size: 190 (95 participants in each group)

The assessment of the key kinetic parameters as well as the guide to the selection of operative parameters, as required to get the required equilibrated Kt/V (eKt/V = 1.05), will be done by using SPEEDY, a spreadsheet prescription tool that uses essentially the same equations used by Solute Solver, the software based on the double pool UKM recommended by the 2015 KDOQI guidelines. SPEEDY is freely available at the European Nephrology Portal (ENP).

The link is https://enp-era-edta.org/174/page/home. The control arm includes patients put on a thrice-weekly HD schedule, as detailed above. The dialysis dose (eKt/V) should be about 1.05.

PICO question:

Participants with CKD-EPI GFR ≤ 10 ml/min and daily urine output \> 600 ml Intervention: one or two weekly hemodialysis (as detailed above) Comparator: three weekly hemodialysis (as per standard practice and as detailed above) Outcome: Residual renal function

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

End Stage Renal Disease on Dialysis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

REAL LIFE is a pragmatic, prospective, multicentre, open label RCT, investigator-initiated, comparing the intervention arm (incremental HD) with the control arm (standard 3HD/wk). It consists in starting the HD treatment adopting the new incremental approach guided by the VTM. The investigators recommend to start and keep on with once-weekly HD, which should be possible until residual renal urea clearance (KRU) falls below 2.5 - 3.0 mL/min/35 L, i.e., glomerular filtration rate (GFR) ≈ 4 mL/min/1.73 m2. Then, HD sessions will be increased to twice-weekly. When KRU falls bellow 1.5 ml/min/35L, dialysis schedule will change to thrice-weekly, as per criteria for progression. It is controlled through usual clinical practice.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Incremental hemodialysis

Procedure: Incremental hemodialysis. It consists in reducing the frequency or number of sessions per week with which patients start the HD treatment. The experimental group will start with one session/week, then the number of weekly sessions will be increased to two and later to three as per criteria for progression

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Incremental hemodialysis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

95 patients will start renal replacement therapy (RRT) with an incremental hemodialysis (once-weekly or twice-weekly) regimen.

Conventional hemodialysis

Procedure: Conventional hemodialysis. It is controlled through usual clinical practice, based on starting the HD treatment with three sessions per week (control group).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional hemodialysis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

95 patients will start renal replacement therapy (RRT) with the standard (thrice-weekly) hemodialysis regimen.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Incremental hemodialysis

95 patients will start renal replacement therapy (RRT) with an incremental hemodialysis (once-weekly or twice-weekly) regimen.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Conventional hemodialysis

95 patients will start renal replacement therapy (RRT) with the standard (thrice-weekly) hemodialysis regimen.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults aged \> 18 years
* Start of maintenance hemodialysis treatment due to advanced CKD stage 5D
* Patients who are about to start HD or have already started HD within a period of ≤ 2 weeks
* Glomerular filtration rate \<= 10 mL/min/1.73 m2, as estimated by means of CKD-EPI formula.

Exclusion Criteria

* Age \< 18 years
* Acute kidney injury or acute on chronic kidney injury
* eGFR higher than 10 mL/min/1.73 m2
* UO \< 600 mL/day
* Already treated with other replacement therapies (peritoneal dialysis or kidney transplant)
* Unable or unwilling to give informed consent.
* Unable to comply with trial procedures, e.g., collection of UO.
* Likely survival prognosis or planned modality or centre transfer \< 6 months.
* Patients who are in the waiting list for a living kidney transplant
* Associated diseases: active neoplastic disease; refractory congestive heart failure (type IV NYHA, ejection fraction ≤ 30%) requiring high ultrafiltration volumes per session.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

European Renal Association - European Dialysis and Transplant Association

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico di Bari

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Loreto Gesualdo, MD

Full Professor of Nephrology University of Bari Aldo Moro - Head of the Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation Unit

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico

Bari, , Italy

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Loreto Gesualdo, MD

Role: CONTACT

+390805594041

Domenico Roselli, MSc

Role: CONTACT

+390805592778

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Loreto Gesualdo

Role: primary

+390805594041

Domenico Roselli

Role: backup

+390805592778

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Casino FG, Basile C. The variable target model: a paradigm shift in the incremental haemodialysis prescription. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017 Jan 1;32(1):182-190. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfw339.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 27742823 (View on PubMed)

Basile C, Casino FG, Kalantar-Zadeh K. Is incremental hemodialysis ready to return on the scene? From empiricism to kinetic modelling. J Nephrol. 2017 Aug;30(4):521-529. doi: 10.1007/s40620-017-0391-0. Epub 2017 Mar 23.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28337715 (View on PubMed)

Basile C, Casino FG; EUDIAL Working Group of ERA-EDTA. Incremental haemodialysis and residual kidney function: more and more observations but no trials. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2019 Nov 1;34(11):1806-1811. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfz035. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 30805639 (View on PubMed)

Casino FG, Basile C. A user-friendly tool for incremental haemodialysis prescription. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2018 Jun 1;33(6):1074-1075. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfy081. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 29672745 (View on PubMed)

Casino FG, Lopez T. The equivalent renal urea clearance: a new parameter to assess dialysis dose. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1996 Aug;11(8):1574-81.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 8856214 (View on PubMed)

Teruel-Briones JL, Fernandez-Lucas M, Rivera-Gorrin M, Ruiz-Roso G, Diaz-Dominguez M, Rodriguez-Mendiola N, Quereda-Rodriguez-Navarro C. Progression of residual renal function with an increase in dialysis: haemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis. Nefrologia. 2013;33(5):640-9. doi: 10.3265/Nefrologia.pre2013.May.12038. English, Spanish.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24089155 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

REAL LIFE

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Incremental Haemodialysis in Incident Patients
NCT03239808 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA