Dialysis Performance of Different Dialyzer Membranes Using Different Coagulation Strategies

NCT ID: NCT03820401

Last Updated: 2019-01-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-03-07

Study Completion Date

2019-01-17

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Coagulation within the dialyzer membrane fibres is an obvious biological sign of bio-incompatibility. To avoid clotting during extracorporeal treatment, an anticoagulant is added to the circuit, resulting in an increased risk for bleeding complications.

In addition, there is evidence that a substantial number of fibers can become blocked before this is reflected in routinely observed parameters, or in termination of the dialysis session. Little is known about the impact of such subclinical clotting on dialyzer performance in terms of solute clearance.

Membrane clogging due to deposition of proteins and red blood cells on the dialysis membrane may influence both the diffusive and convective transport characteristics of the dialyzer membrane before leading to complete dialyzer clotting.

In 2018, the invesitgators described a method to objectively count the number of blocked fibres inside a dialyzer using a micro-CT scanning technique.

In the present trial, the investigators use this method to assess the resistance of the dialyzer to clotting, and to evaluate the impact of subclinical fibre blocking on solute removal and thus performance of a dialyzer during a dialysis session.

The aim of this randomized cross-over study is to objectively quantify the performance of different dialyzer membranes: ATA™ membrane in the Solacea™ dialyzer, polysulfone membrane in the FX800 dialyzer, and the heparin-coated AN membrane in the Evodial dialyzer, and this with different anticoagulation strategies.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This single centre, randomized cross-over study includes ten consecutive stable chronic hemodialysis (HD) patients who experienced stable dialysis sessions during the last 4 weeks, and had no known coagulation disorder, active inflammation or malignancy.

Double-needle vascular access is achieved through a native arterio-venous fistula or a well-functioning double lumen tunnelled central venous catheter.

In a first test series, each patient is dialyzed for 240min (at midweek) in 4 different regimens, randomly using 2 different dialyzers and 2 different anticoagulation schemes. Patients receive their regular brand of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin anticoagulation at the beginning of the dialysis session, and this randomly either at their regular dose (full dose 1/1) or at only 50% of their regular dose (half dose 1/2). All test sessions are performed with blood flow at 300mL/min and dialysate flow at 500mL/min in post dilution hemodiafiltration (HDF) mode (substitution flow 75mL/min). Ultrafiltration rates is set according to the patient's interdialytic weight gain and clinical status:

1. ATA™ Solacea 19H - HDF - 1/1 anticoagulation
2. ATA™ Solacea 19H - HDF - 1/2 anticoagulation
3. polysulfone FX800 - HDF - 1/1 anticoagulation
4. polysulfone FX800 - HDF - 1/2 anticoagulation

During the 4 experimental midweek sessions, blood is sampled from the arterial and venous blood lines, and spent dialysate is sampled from the outlet line, all at 60min after the dialysis start. Blood samples are immediately centrifuged and serum and dialysate are stored at -80°C until batch analysis.

Concentrations of urea, kappa and lambda free light chains, and myoglobin are determined. Extraction ratios and adsorption on the membrane are calculated from concentrations.

At the end of the dialysis session, a standard rinsing procedure of the hemodialyzer is performed using exact 300mL rinsing solution. Next, the hemodialyzer is dried using continuous positive pressure ventilation. Dialyzer fibre blocking is visualized in the dialyzer outlet potting using a 3D CT scanning technique on micrometer resolution. HECTOR is a High Energy CT scanner Optimized for Research, built by the Ghent University Centre for X-ray Tomography (UGCT) in collaboration with the UGCT spin-off company XRE (Gent, Belgium). In front of the X-ray source, the dialyzer is mounted vertically on a precision rotation stage, and radiographies were recorded over 360° with an angular interval of 0.15°. Scan conditions are optimized to maximize the signal-to-noise ratio based on the sample size and structure, and the scanner properties. The tube voltage is set at 80kV, at a power of 20 Watts, the maximal power that allowed imaging at a resolution of 25µm. A total of 2401 projections are recorded with 500ms exposure each, resulting in a total exposure time of 20 minutes. Acquired images at 0 (projection 1) and 360° (projection 2401) are compared to exclude movement of the hemodialyzer during the scanning process. Reconstruction of the raw projection data is performed with the Octopus Reconstruction software package, licensed by XRE23.

Fibers are counted in the central cross-section of the dialyzer outlet potting in a computer-based way using the Fiji image processing toolkit of ImageJ analysis software (ImageJ 1.51H, NIH, Bethesda, USA), an open-source platform for biological-image analysis.

In a second test series in 10 stable HD patients, no blood sampling is performed but dialyzers are scanned post dialysis. The following different dialyzers in HD modus at midweek are tested:

1. ATA™ Solacea 19H - HD - 1/1 anticoagulation
2. ATA™ Solacea 19H - HD - 1/2 anticoagulation
3. polysulfone FX800 - HD - 1/1 anticoagulation
4. polysulfone FX800 - HD - 1/2 anticoagulation
5. polysulfone FX800 - HD - 1/2 anticoagulation - with predialysis albmuin priming of the membrane
6. Evodial - HD - no anticoagulation
7. Evodial - HD - no anticoagulation - with predialysis albmuin priming of the membrane

In a third test series in 10 stable HD patients, no blood sampling is performed but dialyzers are scanned post dialysis. The following different dialyzers at midweek are tested:

1. ATA™ Solacea 19H - pre dilution HDF (substitution 150mL/min) - 1/4 anticoagulation
2. ATA™ Solacea 19H - post dilution HDF (substitution 75mL/min) - 1/4 anticoagulation
3. ATA™ Solacea 19H - HD - 1/4 anticoagulation
4. ATA™ Solacea 19H - pre dilution HDF (substitution 150mL/min) - no anticoagulation
5. ATA™ Solacea 19H - post dilution HDF (substitution 75mL/min) - no anticoagulation
6. ATA™ Solacea 19H - HD - no anticoagulation

First outcome measure: relative number of open fibers in each tested dialyzer. Second outcome measure: dialyzer performance (extraction ratio, adsorption).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hemodialysis Coagulation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Solacea_postHDF_1/1anticoagulation

intervention:

* choice of dialyzer: Solacea dialyzer (Nipro, Japan)
* choice of dialysis mode: post dilution hemodiafiltration
* choice of anticoagulation strategy: standard anticoagulation dose

measurements:

* blood \& dialysate sampling at 60min after dialysis start
* microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

choice of dialyzer

Intervention Type DEVICE

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers

choice of dialysis mode

Intervention Type OTHER

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers used in different dialysis stategies

choice of anticoagulation strategy

Intervention Type OTHER

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers using different anticoagulation strategies

Solacea_postHDF_1/2anticoagulation

intervention:

* choice of dialyzer: Solacea dialyzer (Nipro Japan)
* choice of dialysis mode: post dilution hemodiafiltration
* choice of anticoagulation strategy: the patient receives only half of his/her standard anticoagulation dose

measurements:

* blood \& dialysate sampling at 60min after dialysis start
* microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

choice of dialyzer

Intervention Type DEVICE

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers

choice of dialysis mode

Intervention Type OTHER

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers used in different dialysis stategies

choice of anticoagulation strategy

Intervention Type OTHER

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers using different anticoagulation strategies

FX800_postHDF_1/1anticoagulation

intervention:

* choice of dialyzer: FX800 dialyzer (Fresenius Medical Care, Germany)
* choice of dialysis mode: post dilution hemodiafiltration
* choice of anticoagulation strategy: standard anticoagulation dose

measurements:

* blood \& dialysate sampling at 60min after dialysis start
* microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

choice of dialyzer

Intervention Type DEVICE

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers

choice of dialysis mode

Intervention Type OTHER

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers used in different dialysis stategies

choice of anticoagulation strategy

Intervention Type OTHER

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers using different anticoagulation strategies

FX800_postHDF_1/2anticoagulation

intervention:

* choice of dialyzer: FX800 dialyzer (Fresenius Medical Care, Germany)
* choice of dialysis mode: post dilution hemodiafiltration
* choice of anticoagulation strategy: the patient receives only half of his/her standard anticoagulation dose

measurements:

* blood \& dialysate sampling at 60min after dialysis start
* microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

choice of dialyzer

Intervention Type DEVICE

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers

choice of dialysis mode

Intervention Type OTHER

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers used in different dialysis stategies

choice of anticoagulation strategy

Intervention Type OTHER

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers using different anticoagulation strategies

Solacea_HD_1/1anticoagulation

intervention:

* choice of dialyzer: Solacea dialyzer (Nipro, Japan)
* choice of dialysis mode: hemodialysis
* choice of anticoagulation strategy: standard anticoagulation dose

measurement:

\- microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

choice of dialyzer

Intervention Type DEVICE

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers

choice of dialysis mode

Intervention Type OTHER

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers used in different dialysis stategies

choice of anticoagulation strategy

Intervention Type OTHER

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers using different anticoagulation strategies

Solacea_HD_1/2anticoagulation

intervention:

* choice of dialyzer: Solacea dialyzer (Nipro, Japan)
* choice of dialysis mode: hemodialysis
* choice of anticoagulation strategy: the patient receives only half of his/her standard anticoagulation dose

measurements:

\- microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

choice of dialyzer

Intervention Type DEVICE

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers

choice of dialysis mode

Intervention Type OTHER

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers used in different dialysis stategies

choice of anticoagulation strategy

Intervention Type OTHER

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers using different anticoagulation strategies

FX800_HD_1/1anticoagulation

intervention:

* choice of dialyzer: FX800 dialyzer (Fresenius Medical Care, Germany)
* choice of dialysis mode: hemodialysis
* choice of anticoagulation strategy: standard anticoagulation dose

measurements:

\- microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

choice of dialyzer

Intervention Type DEVICE

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers

choice of dialysis mode

Intervention Type OTHER

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers used in different dialysis stategies

choice of anticoagulation strategy

Intervention Type OTHER

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers using different anticoagulation strategies

FX800_HD_1/2anticoagulation

intervention:

* choice of dialyzer: FX800 dialyzer (Fresenius Medical Care, Germany)
* choice of dialysis mode: hemodialysis
* choice of anticoagulation strategy: the patient receives only half of his/her standard anticoagulation dose

measurements:

\- microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

choice of dialyzer

Intervention Type DEVICE

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers

choice of dialysis mode

Intervention Type OTHER

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers used in different dialysis stategies

choice of anticoagulation strategy

Intervention Type OTHER

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers using different anticoagulation strategies

preparation of dialyzer

Intervention Type OTHER

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers either preprimed with Albumin or not

FX800_HD_1/2anticoagulation_albuprime

intervention:

* choice of dialyzer: FX800 dialyzer (Fresenius Medical Care, Germany)
* choice of dialysis mode: hemodialysis
* choice of anticoagulation strategy: the patient receives only half of his/her standard anticoagulation dose
* preparation of dialyzer: the dialyzer was preprimed with albumin solution

measurement:

\- microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

choice of dialyzer

Intervention Type DEVICE

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers

choice of dialysis mode

Intervention Type OTHER

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers used in different dialysis stategies

choice of anticoagulation strategy

Intervention Type OTHER

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers using different anticoagulation strategies

preparation of dialyzer

Intervention Type OTHER

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers either preprimed with Albumin or not

Evodial_HD_no anticoagulation

intervention:

* choice of dialyzer: Evodial 1.3 (Baxter, USA)
* choice of dialysis mode: hemodialysis
* choice of anticoagulation strategy: no anticoagulation is administered

measurement:

\- microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

choice of dialyzer

Intervention Type DEVICE

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers

choice of dialysis mode

Intervention Type OTHER

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers used in different dialysis stategies

choice of anticoagulation strategy

Intervention Type OTHER

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers using different anticoagulation strategies

Evodial_HD_no anticoagulation_albuprime

intervention:

* choice of dialyzer: Evodial 1.3 (Baxter, USA)
* choice of dialysis mode: hemodialysis
* choice of anticoagulation strategy: no anticoagulation is administered
* preparation of dialyzer: the dialyzer was preprimed with albumin solution

measurement:

\- microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

choice of dialyzer

Intervention Type DEVICE

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers

choice of dialysis mode

Intervention Type OTHER

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers used in different dialysis stategies

choice of anticoagulation strategy

Intervention Type OTHER

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers using different anticoagulation strategies

preparation of dialyzer

Intervention Type OTHER

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers either preprimed with Albumin or not

Solacea_preHDF_1/4anticoagulation

intervention:

* choice of dialyzer: Solacea dialyzer (Nipro Japan)
* choice of dialysis mode: pre dilution hemodiafiltration
* choice of anticoagulation strategy: the patient receives only 1/4th of his/her standard anticoagulation dose

measurements:

\- microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

choice of dialyzer

Intervention Type DEVICE

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers

choice of dialysis mode

Intervention Type OTHER

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers used in different dialysis stategies

choice of anticoagulation strategy

Intervention Type OTHER

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers using different anticoagulation strategies

Solacea_postHDF_1/4anticoagulation

intervention:

* choice of dialyzer: Solacea dialyzer (Nipro Japan)
* choice of dialysis mode: post dilution hemodiafiltration
* choice of anticoagulation strategy: the patient receives only 1/4th of his/her standard anticoagulation dose

measurements:

\- microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

choice of dialyzer

Intervention Type DEVICE

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers

choice of dialysis mode

Intervention Type OTHER

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers used in different dialysis stategies

choice of anticoagulation strategy

Intervention Type OTHER

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers using different anticoagulation strategies

Solacea_HD_1/4anticoagulation

intervention:

* choice of dialyzer: Solacea dialyzer (Nipro Japan)
* choice of dialysis mode: hemodialysis
* choice of anticoagulation strategy: the patient receives only 1/4th of his/her standard anticoagulation dose

measurements:microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

choice of dialyzer

Intervention Type DEVICE

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers

choice of dialysis mode

Intervention Type OTHER

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers used in different dialysis stategies

choice of anticoagulation strategy

Intervention Type OTHER

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers using different anticoagulation strategies

Solacea_preHDF_no anticoagulation

intervention:

* choice of dialyzer: Solacea dialyzer (Nipro Japan)
* choice of dialysis mode: pre dilution hemodiafiltration
* choice of anticoagulation strategy: no anticoagulation is administered

measurements:

\- microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

choice of dialyzer

Intervention Type DEVICE

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers

choice of dialysis mode

Intervention Type OTHER

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers used in different dialysis stategies

choice of anticoagulation strategy

Intervention Type OTHER

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers using different anticoagulation strategies

Solacea_postHDF_no anticoagulation

intervention:

* choice of dialyzer: Solacea dialyzer (Nipro Japan)
* choice of dialysis mode: post dilution hemodiafiltration
* choice of anticoagulation strategy: no anticoagulation is administered

measurements:

\- microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

choice of dialyzer

Intervention Type DEVICE

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers

choice of dialysis mode

Intervention Type OTHER

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers used in different dialysis stategies

choice of anticoagulation strategy

Intervention Type OTHER

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers using different anticoagulation strategies

Solacea_HD_no anticoagulation

intervention:

* choice of dialyzer: Solacea dialyzer (Nipro Japan)
* choice of dialysis mode: hemodialysis
* choice of anticoagulation strategy: no anticoagulation is administered

measurements:

\- microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

choice of dialyzer

Intervention Type DEVICE

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers

choice of dialysis mode

Intervention Type OTHER

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers used in different dialysis stategies

choice of anticoagulation strategy

Intervention Type OTHER

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers using different anticoagulation strategies

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

choice of dialyzer

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers

Intervention Type DEVICE

choice of dialysis mode

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers used in different dialysis stategies

Intervention Type OTHER

choice of anticoagulation strategy

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers using different anticoagulation strategies

Intervention Type OTHER

preparation of dialyzer

Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers either preprimed with Albumin or not

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 years or older
* experienced stable dialysis sessions during the last 4 weeks
* double needle/lumen well-functioning vascular access

Exclusion Criteria

* known coagulation disorder
* active inflammation
* malignancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Ghent

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital, Ghent

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ghent University Hospital - Nephrology

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Vanommeslaeghe F, Van Biesen W, Dierick M, Boone M, Dhondt A, Eloot S. Micro-computed tomography for the quantification of blocked fibers in hemodialyzers. Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 8;8(1):2677. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20898-w.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 29422614 (View on PubMed)

Natale P, Palmer SC, Ruospo M, Longmuir H, Dodds B, Prasad R, Batt TJ, Jose MD, Strippoli GF. Anticoagulation for people receiving long-term haemodialysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 8;1(1):CD011858. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011858.pub2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38189593 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UGent_FiberClotting_1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.