Citrate Anticoagulation vs. Heparin-Coated Dialyzers

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

33 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-01-31

Study Completion Date

2005-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Hemodialysis causes contact activation of the coagulation pathway (1). For this reason, unfractionated or low molecular weight heparins are administered in daily practice to prevent thrombosis of the dialyzer and blood circuit, but the dose commonly used causes systemic anticoagulation. This can cause serious complications in patients with high risk of bleeding. Regional and low-dose heparinization, use of prostacycline, regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA), and high-flow-rate hemodialysis without anticoagulation have been shown to reduce bleeding complications. Each of these methods, however, is characterized by its own technical difficulties, limitations, or complications.

The present study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of heparin-coated polyacrylonitrile membranes (AN69ST) and regional citrate anticoagulation in hemodialysis patients at risk of bleeding

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

1. Open label single centre prospective randomized trial including 33 patients aged over 18 years with chronic kidney disease stage 5 requiring intermittent hemodialysis at the University Hospital Leuven and at risk of bleeding. Exclusion criteria were: any haemostatic disorder favouring either bleeding or clotting, anti-vitamin K or heparin treatment, heparin induced thrombocytopenia and haemodynamic instability. Written informed consent before enrolment.
2. Random allocation (by sealed enveloppe) to RCA with a calcium free dialysate (RCA-Ca0), RCA with a calcium containing dialysate (RCA-Ca1,5) or to anticoagulant-free hemodiaysis with a heparin-coated polyacrylonitrile membrane (Nephral 300ST®).
3. At the end of each dialysis session, arterial and venous drip chambers and the filter will be inspected for visible signs of coagulation. Corresponding to the standard care at our dialysis unit, a semi-quantitative score with a range from 0 (no signs of clotting) to 4 (complete occlusion) will be used for evaluation of the dialyzer. By definition, the drip chamber will be considered clotted when a thrombus was visible after the rinse back procedure. A fibrin ring against the wall of the drip chamber will be considered normal.
4. Blood samples for assessment of prothrombin fragment F1+2 and d-dimers will be collected from the inlet blood catheter prior to hemodialysis initiation and during hemodialysis at T15, T120 and T238.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dialysis

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

citrate anticoagulation heparin-coated membrane

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

anticoagulation procedure

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* aged over 18 years
* chronic kidney disease stage 5 requiring intermittent hemodialysis
* at risk of bleeding
* written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* any haemostatic disorder favouring either bleeding or clotting
* anti-vitamin K or heparin treatment
* heparin induced thrombocytopenia
* haemodynamic instability

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Pieter Evenepoel, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hopsital Leuven

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Natale P, Palmer SC, Ruospo M, Longmuir H, Dodds B, Prasad R, Batt TJ, Jose MD, Strippoli GF. Anticoagulation for people receiving long-term haemodialysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 8;1(1):CD011858. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011858.pub2.

Reference Type DERIVED

PMID: 38189593 (View on PubMed)

Evenepoel P, Dejagere T, Verhamme P, Claes K, Kuypers D, Bammens B, Vanrenterghem Y. Heparin-coated polyacrylonitrile membrane versus regional citrate anticoagulation: a prospective randomized study of 2 anticoagulation strategies in patients at risk of bleeding. Am J Kidney Dis. 2007 May;49(5):642-9. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.02.001.