Low-BFR vs Moderate-Intensity Resistance Training on Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Elderly Women

NCT ID: NCT07266961

Last Updated: 2025-12-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-06-01

Study Completion Date

2023-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is aiming to compare the CRF utilizing LIRT-BFR and MIRT in the elderly. Both techniques provided comparable gains in VO₂ max and the BORG scale. The BFR group displayed a greater level of safety for elderly to undertake resistance training with the same benefit as the MIRT group.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Decreased cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is a common issue among older adults and contributes to reduced physical activity levels and quality of life. While aerobic exercise is known to improve CRF, it has limited effects on muscle strength and mass. In contrast, resistance training can enhance both cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness when performed at moderate intensity. Blood flow restriction (BFR) applied during low-intensity resistance training (LIRT-BFR) has emerged as a promising alternative that may elicit similar physiological benefits to traditional moderate-intensity resistance training (MIRT) while reducing mechanical stress on joints and muscles. This study aims to compare the effects of six weeks of LIRT-BFR versus MIRT on cardiorespiratory fitness in elderly women. Twenty-eight participants were randomly assigned to either the LIRT-BFR group or the MIRT group and completed 12 supervised exercise sessions over six weeks. The MIRT group performed exercises at 40-60% of one-repetition maximum (1-RM), while the LIRT-BFR group exercised at 20-30% of 1-RM under blood flow restriction. The primary outcome was the predicted VO₂max obtained from the 6-Minute Walking Test (6MWT). The secondary outcome was the rating of perceived exertion (RPE) measured using the modified Borg scale following the 6MWT.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiorespiratory Fitness

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

LIRT-BFR group

The LIRT-BFR group used a cuff on the upper third of the thigh with a restriction pressure of 50 mmHg or 40% Arterial Occlusion Pressure to apply BFR while engaging in low-load resistance training that targeted the quadriceps femoris muscle at an intensity of 20-30% of 1-RM. The resistance training protocol consists of four sets of knee extensions using an ankle weight in a sitting position. Each set consists of 30 repetitions on the first set and 15 repetitions each on sets 2-4 with a 30-second interval between sets. The air pressure cuff was deflated during the interval period. In the third week, the weight load was recalculated to 40% of 1-RM in order to accommodate subsequent 1-RM testing procedures.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Low Intensity Resistance Training and Blood Flow Resistance

Intervention Type OTHER

The LIRT-BFR group used a cuff on the upper third of the thigh with a restriction pressure of 50 mmHg or 40% Arterial Occlusion Pressure to apply BFR while engaging in low-load resistance training that targeted the quadriceps femoris muscle at an intensity of 20-30% of 1-RM. The resistance training protocol consists of four sets of knee extensions using an ankle weight in a sitting position. Each set consists of 30 repetitions on the first set and 15 repetitions each on sets 2-4 with a 30-second interval between sets. The air pressure cuff was deflated during the interval period. In the third week, the weight load was recalculated to 40% of 1-RM in order to accommodate subsequent 1-RM testing procedures.

MIRT group

The MIRT group conducted three sessions of moderate-intensity resistance training, concentrating on the quadriceps femoris muscle, with weights set at 40-60% of their 1RM or higher. While the MIRT protocol resembled that of LIRT-BFR, each session comprised 8-12 repetitions, followed by a 2-minute rest between sets. In the third week, the 1-RM testing protocol was revised, with the weight adjusted to 60% of the 1-RM.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Moderate Intensity Resistance Training

Intervention Type OTHER

The MIRT group conducted three sets of moderate-intensity resistance training, concentrating on the quadriceps femoris muscle, with weights set at 40-60% of their 1RM or higher. While the MIRT protocol resembled that of LIRT-BFR, each set comprised 8-12 repetitions, followed by a 2-minute rest between sets. In the third week, the 1-RM testing protocol was revised, with the weight adjusted to 60% of the 1-RM.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Low Intensity Resistance Training and Blood Flow Resistance

The LIRT-BFR group used a cuff on the upper third of the thigh with a restriction pressure of 50 mmHg or 40% Arterial Occlusion Pressure to apply BFR while engaging in low-load resistance training that targeted the quadriceps femoris muscle at an intensity of 20-30% of 1-RM. The resistance training protocol consists of four sets of knee extensions using an ankle weight in a sitting position. Each set consists of 30 repetitions on the first set and 15 repetitions each on sets 2-4 with a 30-second interval between sets. The air pressure cuff was deflated during the interval period. In the third week, the weight load was recalculated to 40% of 1-RM in order to accommodate subsequent 1-RM testing procedures.

Intervention Type OTHER

Moderate Intensity Resistance Training

The MIRT group conducted three sets of moderate-intensity resistance training, concentrating on the quadriceps femoris muscle, with weights set at 40-60% of their 1RM or higher. While the MIRT protocol resembled that of LIRT-BFR, each set comprised 8-12 repetitions, followed by a 2-minute rest between sets. In the third week, the 1-RM testing protocol was revised, with the weight adjusted to 60% of the 1-RM.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Female aged ≥60 years who routinely performed aerobic exercise in RSUD Dr. Soetomo
* Normal cognitive function (MoCA-Ina score ≥ 26)
* Passed the screening questionnaire.

Exclusion Criteria

* Severe physical disability (presented with a musculoskeletal, cardiorespiratory, or neurological disease that affected physical performance during exercise)
* Visual and hearing impairment
* Balance impairment
* Blood clotting disorder
* Peripheral arterial disease on the legs
* Deep vein thrombosis
* Neuropathy in the lower extremity
* Uncontrolled hypertension or diabetes mellitus
* Previous stroke and compartment syndrome
* Knee osteoarthritis with moderate pain (VAS \>4)
* Past vascular surgery
* Prior skin graft on the lower leg area
* Lower limb bone surgery within the past 12 weeks
* Immobilization during the last 4 weeks
* Statin consumption
* Sarcopenia
* Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo with an exacerbation in the previous 4 weeks.
Minimum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Dr. Soetomo General Hospital

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nuniek Nugraheni Sulistiawaty

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation - Dr. Soetomo Regional Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation - Dr. Soetomo Regional Hospital

Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Indonesia

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

DrSoetomoLIRT-BFR&MIRT

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.