Single Shot Exparel vs Catheters in Lower Extremity Trauma

NCT ID: NCT07221019

Last Updated: 2025-10-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

90 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-09-12

Study Completion Date

2029-08-11

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will compare the use of single-shot Exparel, a long-acting local anesthestic, with the use of catheters that deliver a continuous flow of the short-acting local anesthetic ropivacaine. The comparison will be done in patients who receive preoperative adductor and sciatic nerve blocks prior to orthopedic surgery for traumatic lower extremity injury. The patients' pain will then be monitored for up to 72 hours after injection, measuring every 12 hours after injection until the 72-hour mark. Opioid consumption (measured in morphine milligram equivalents) will also be tracked over this time period.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The use of Exparel has been widely criticized over the past few years with regard to its efficacy compared to perineural catheters and whether or not it truly lasts 72 hours, as is often advertised. However, it is still used in many centers for the proposed increased duration of action and ease of use compared to indwelling catheters, which require a greater degree of monitoring and follow-up for removal. Various studies conducted have looked at the efficacy of Exparel and have found no superiority over nerve blocks with other local anesthetic agents. However, nerve blocks with catheters have never been directly compared to exparel injections for pain control. As such, the goal of this study is to elucidate whether there truly is a difference between the two. In this study, the study team will compare preoperative adductor and sciatic nerve blocks with exparel versus catheters in orthopedic surgery patients who present with a traumatic lower extremity injury. Exparel has been documented to increase the duration of a nerve block by up to 72 hours. Studies comparing exparel single shot versus bupivacaine single shot have favored for the latter, which pharmacodynamically makes sense. A liposomal compound which slowly denatures to present an active component would seemingly be unlikely to match up against the higher concentration of said active component flood the desired site of action. In our study, the study team plans to measure the duration of the block with the addition of exparel in comparison to the duration of the block with a catheter which is connected to a pump continuously infusing a set rate of local anesthetics. Our primary research question is whether there is a statistically significant difference in pain control for 72 hours post-op in lower extremity orthopedic trauma when using Exparel versus a short-acting local anesthetic supplied via continuous infusion, in this case ropivacaine.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Fracture Dislocation of Ankle Joint Fracture Leg Fracture Femur Fracture Lower Leg Fracture

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Exparel + Bupivacaine

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Exparel + Bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients will receive the ERAS standard of care which includes gabapentin, Tylenol, and Toradol or Celebrex preoperatively as well as 20 cc of 0.25% bupivacaine injected in the adductor space followed by 30 cc of 0.25% bupivacaine in the sciatic nerve block. Injections will be completed by an anesthesia provider in the same manner as above. Catheters will be left in both spaces with post-operative pumps running 0.2% ropivacaine at 8 cc/hr.

Bupivacaine

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients will receive the ERAS standard of care which includes gabapentin, Tylenol, and Toradol or Celebrex preoperatively as well as 20 cc of 0.25% bupivacaine with 10 cc of Exparel injected in the adductor space followed by 30 cc of 0.25% bupivacaine with 10 cc of Exparel in the sciatic nerve block. Injections will be completed by an anesthesia provider using astandard aseptic technique with ultrasound guidance. A 22 gauge 5-10cm needle is inserted with direct visualization under ultrasound and 2-5 cc aliquots are injected with aspiration repeated to ensure no vascular injury or injection until a total of 30 cc is injected into the adductor space and 40 cc is injected into the area surrounding the sciatic nerve. Exparel in this situation is being used off-label given that it is not FDA-approved for lower extremity nerve blocks. However, Exparel is commonly used in other nerve blocks and is FDA-approved for blocks such as the interscalene brachial plexus block.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bupivacaine

Patients will receive the ERAS standard of care which includes gabapentin, Tylenol, and Toradol or Celebrex preoperatively as well as 20 cc of 0.25% bupivacaine with 10 cc of Exparel injected in the adductor space followed by 30 cc of 0.25% bupivacaine with 10 cc of Exparel in the sciatic nerve block. Injections will be completed by an anesthesia provider using astandard aseptic technique with ultrasound guidance. A 22 gauge 5-10cm needle is inserted with direct visualization under ultrasound and 2-5 cc aliquots are injected with aspiration repeated to ensure no vascular injury or injection until a total of 30 cc is injected into the adductor space and 40 cc is injected into the area surrounding the sciatic nerve. Exparel in this situation is being used off-label given that it is not FDA-approved for lower extremity nerve blocks. However, Exparel is commonly used in other nerve blocks and is FDA-approved for blocks such as the interscalene brachial plexus block.

Intervention Type DRUG

Exparel + Bupivacaine

Patients will receive the ERAS standard of care which includes gabapentin, Tylenol, and Toradol or Celebrex preoperatively as well as 20 cc of 0.25% bupivacaine injected in the adductor space followed by 30 cc of 0.25% bupivacaine in the sciatic nerve block. Injections will be completed by an anesthesia provider in the same manner as above. Catheters will be left in both spaces with post-operative pumps running 0.2% ropivacaine at 8 cc/hr.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Closed lower extremity orthopedic injury
* Opioid naive patients
* No other significant surgical injuries on admission as determined by study physician

Exclusion Criteria

* Allergy to local anesthetics
* Multiple traumatic injuries
* Weight less than 60 kg
* Prior opioid use or risk of increased pain control needs as determined by PI
* Chronic opioid use
* Open fractures
* Plastic surgery needed for complete closure
* Patient has intraoperative cardiac arrest
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

George Washington University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The George Washington University Hospital

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Jevaughn S Davis, MD

Role: CONTACT

2028234259

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Eduard Shaykhinurov, MS

Role: primary

202-203-8960

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NCR256547

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Adductor Canal Block
NCT04513145 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE2/PHASE3