Femoral Versus Adductor Canal Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Knee Arthroplasty

NCT ID: NCT01759277

Last Updated: 2021-02-18

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-12-31

Study Completion Date

2014-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients typically experience moderate-to-severe pain following knee arthroplasty that is usually treated with a combination of oral and intravenous analgesics and enhanced by continuous peripheral nerve blocks. There are currently two locations to place a perineural catheter to provide analgesia following knee arthroplasty: a femoral nerve catheter and an adductor canal catheter. Both have been demonstrated to be effective following knee arthroplasty. However, it remains unknown if one location is superior to the other; or, more accurately, what the relative benefits are to each technique.

While femoral CPNB has many benefits, one of the challenges of using this technique is that there is a decrease in quadriceps muscle strength which can be a limiting factor for rehabilitation. In contrast, the adductor canal catheter affects only the vastus medialis. This block may lessen block-induced quadriceps weakness following knee arthroplasty compared with a femoral infusion.

The investigators hypothesize that compared with femoral perineural local anesthetic infusion, an adductor canal infusion is associated with a shorter time until four discharge criteria are met: (1) adequate analgesia; (2) independence from intravenous analgesics; (3) ability to ambulate 30 m; and (4) ability to stand, walk 3 m, and return to a sitting position without another's assistance.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Of importance: The primary investigation involves 80 evaluable subjects (with primary endpoint data) having tri-compartment knee arthroplasty. In addition, the investigators will enroll up to 70 subjects having uni-compartment knee arthroplasty as a pilot study in preparation for a subsequent larger, definitive trial. These two groups will not be analyzed together--they represent two distinct studies: one a definitive RCT for tri-compartment knee arthroplasty; and, one a pilot study for uni-compartment knee arthroplasty.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Postoperative Pain Following Knee Arthroplasty

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control

Femoral perineural local anesthetic infusion

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Control: Femoral perineural local anesthetic infusion

Intervention Type DRUG

The control group will receive a femoral nerve block and postoperative ropivacaine 0.2% infusion

Experimental

Adductor canal perineural local anesthetic infusion

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Experimental: Adductor Canal perineural local anesthetic infusion

Intervention Type DRUG

The control group will receive an adductor canal nerve block and postoperative ropivacaine 0.2% infusion

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Control: Femoral perineural local anesthetic infusion

The control group will receive a femoral nerve block and postoperative ropivacaine 0.2% infusion

Intervention Type DRUG

Experimental: Adductor Canal perineural local anesthetic infusion

The control group will receive an adductor canal nerve block and postoperative ropivacaine 0.2% infusion

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. primary, unilateral knee arthroplasty
2. age ≥ 18 years
3. postoperative analgesic plan includes perineural local anesthetic infusion of 48-72 hours

Exclusion Criteria

1. morbid obesity as defined by a body mass index \>40 (BMI=weight in kg/ \[height in meters\]
2. chronic, high-dose opioid use (greater than 20mg oxycodone-equivalent opioid use daily within the 2 weeks prior to surgery and duration of use \>4 weeks)
3. history of opioid abuse
4. allergy to study medications
5. known renal insufficiency (creatinine \> 1.5 mg/dL)
6. pregnancy
7. incarceration
8. any known neuro-muscular deficit of the ipsilateral femoral nerve, obturator nerve and/or quadriceps muscle (including diabetic peripheral neuropathy); and inability to ambulate 30 m preoperatively.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Summit Medical Products, Inc.

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Teleflex

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of California, San Diego

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Brian M. Ilfeld, MD, MS

Professor of Anesthesiology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Brian M Ilfeld, MD, MS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University California San Diego

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of California San Diego Medical Centers

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Singelyn FJ, Deyaert M, Joris D, Pendeville E, Gouverneur JM. Effects of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with morphine, continuous epidural analgesia, and continuous three-in-one block on postoperative pain and knee rehabilitation after unilateral total knee arthroplasty. Anesth Analg. 1998 Jul;87(1):88-92. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199807000-00019.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9661552 (View on PubMed)

Jenstrup MT, Jaeger P, Lund J, Fomsgaard JS, Bache S, Mathiesen O, Larsen TK, Dahl JB. Effects of adductor-canal-blockade on pain and ambulation after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Mar;56(3):357-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02621.x. Epub 2012 Jan 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22221014 (View on PubMed)

Ilfeld BM, Loland VJ, Sandhu NS, Suresh PJ, Bishop MJ, Donohue MC, Ferguson EJ, Madison SJ. Continuous femoral nerve blocks: the impact of catheter tip location relative to the femoral nerve (anterior versus posterior) on quadriceps weakness and cutaneous sensory block. Anesth Analg. 2012 Sep;115(3):721-7. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318261f326. Epub 2012 Jun 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22745116 (View on PubMed)

Manickam B, Perlas A, Duggan E, Brull R, Chan VW, Ramlogan R. Feasibility and efficacy of ultrasound-guided block of the saphenous nerve in the adductor canal. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 Nov-Dec;34(6):578-80. doi: 10.1097/aap.0b013e3181bfbf84.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19916251 (View on PubMed)

Davis JJ, Bond TS, Swenson JD. Adductor canal block: more than just the saphenous nerve? Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 Nov-Dec;34(6):618-9. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181bfbf00. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19901788 (View on PubMed)

Jaeger P, Grevstad U, Henningsen MH, Gottschau B, Mathiesen O, Dahl JB. Effect of adductor-canal-blockade on established, severe post-operative pain after total knee arthroplasty: a randomised study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Sep;56(8):1013-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2012.02737.x. Epub 2012 Jul 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22834681 (View on PubMed)

Lund J, Jenstrup MT, Jaeger P, Sorensen AM, Dahl JB. Continuous adductor-canal-blockade for adjuvant post-operative analgesia after major knee surgery: preliminary results. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011 Jan;55(1):14-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2010.02333.x. Epub 2010 Oct 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21039357 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Adductor Canal vs Femoral

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.