Adductor Canal Blockade vs Femoral Nerve Blockade on Muscle Strength, Mobility and Pain After TKA

NCT ID: NCT01922596

Last Updated: 2014-01-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-01-31

Study Completion Date

2013-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of the study is to compare the effect of a Adductor Canal Blockade (ACB) vs a Femoral Nerve Blockade (FNB), on muscle strength, mobility and pain in patients with severe pain (VAS pain score \> 60) after Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The patients will be included after surgery (the first 2 postoperative days). Patients reporting VAS \> 60 during active flexion of the knee can be included. All included patients will receive 2 blockades at the same time - an ACB and a FNB, one blockade with 30ml ropivacaine 0,2% and the other with 30ml saline according to randomization.

Prior to, and after, the blockades VAS pain scores will be obtained, muscle strength (quadriceps and adductors) will be measured using a handheld dynanometer and a Timed Up and Go test will be performed.

The study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov after inclusion of the first patient. The reason for this is that we recently became aware of that some journals do not accept a EudraCT registration. The study was registered at EudraCT (2012-004554-28)prior to enrollment of patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Mobility After Total Knee Arthroplasty

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Active FNB, placebo ACB

FNB with 30 ml of ropivacaine 0,2% and ACB with 30 ml of placebo (saline). The ACB will be performed just prior to the FNB. The blockades will be performed just after obtaining the baseline values (outcome measures) at time 0.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ropivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Active ACB, placebo FNB

ACB with 30 ml of ropivacaine 0,2% and FNB with 30 ml of placebo (saline.The ACB will be performed just prior to the FNB. The blockades will be performed just after obtaining the baseline values (outcome measures) at time 0.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ropivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ropivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Naropin Saline

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* TKA within 72 hours and VAS\>60 during 45 degrees active flexion of the knee despite conventional pain medication
* informed consent
* ASA 1-3
* BMI 18-40

Exclusion Criteria

* Unable to communicate in Danish
* Allergic reactions toward ropivacaine
* Alcohol and or drug abuse
* Unable to cooperate
* Known sensory disturbances in the lower limbs
Minimum Eligible Age

30 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ulrik Grevstad

Consultant

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ulrik Grevstad, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Gentofte Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Gentofte Hospital

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Grevstad U, Mathiesen O, Valentiner LS, Jaeger P, Hilsted KL, Dahl JB. Effect of adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block on quadriceps strength, mobilization, and pain after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, blinded study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Jan-Feb;40(1):3-10. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000169.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25376972 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2012-004554-28

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

SM3_UG_12

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Adductor Canal Block
NCT04513145 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE2/PHASE3