Proximal Versus Distal Adductor Canal Blocks for Total Knee Arthroplasty

NCT ID: NCT02701114

Last Updated: 2017-07-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

76 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-02-29

Study Completion Date

2016-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is designed to evaluate pain control of continuous adductor canal blocks placed proximally versus distally within the canal. The investigators hypothesize that there will be similar pain control between both groups.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study is a non-inferiority trial designed to determine whether placement of a continuous block within the adductor canal has a substantial impact on pain following total knee arthroplasty. Our primary outcome to determine this difference will be opioid consumption within the first day following surgery. Secondary outcomes will include: pain scores, quadriceps strength, and distance ambulated during physical therapy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Post-Operative Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Proximal

Proximal Adductor Canal Block

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Proximal Adductor Canal Block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Continuous Nerve Block

Distal

Distal Adductor Canal Block

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Distal Adductor Canal Block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Continuous Nerve Block

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Proximal Adductor Canal Block

Continuous Nerve Block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Distal Adductor Canal Block

Continuous Nerve Block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty
* ASA physical status I-III
* \>18 years old
* Non-pregnant
* Consent to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria

* Refusal to participate
* \<18 years old
* Chronic opioid use
* Localized infection Pregnancy Pre-existing coagulopathy Allergy to ultrasound gel or local anesthetics Contraindication to or refusal of spinal anesthetic
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Benaroya Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Neil Hanson

Staff Anesthesiologist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Neil A Hanson, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Virginia Mason Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Virginia Mason Medical Center

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Meier AW, Auyong DB, Yuan SC, Lin SE, Flaherty JM, Hanson NA. Comparison of Continuous Proximal Versus Distal Adductor Canal Blocks for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Noninferiority Trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Jan;43(1):36-42. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000692.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29140959 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB15118

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.