Comparison of Continuous Femoral Nerve Block and Adductor Canal Block After Total Knee Replacement Therapy
NCT ID: NCT02125903
Last Updated: 2015-01-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
44 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-05-31
2014-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
An alternative method could be an adductor canal block (ACB). Anatomical studies of the adductor canal demonstrated that the adductor canal contains the saphenous nerve, a pure sensory nerve for medial and anterior aspects of the knee and the tibia without any motor function.
This prospective, double-blinded, randomized study investigates the effect of FNB and ACB on quadriceps motor weakness and analgesia determined by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS).
We expect the ACB to be superior in muscle strength but equal in pain score. Both groups receive an additional anterior sciatic nerve block for complete sensory block of the operated knee
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Adductor Canal Blockade vs Femoral Nerve Blockade on Muscle Strength, Mobility and Pain After TKA
NCT01922596
Continuous Adductor Canal Blocks Vs. Low Dose Femoral Nerve Blocks For Early Rehabilitation After Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT02453321
Continuous Adductor Canal Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty Analgesia
NCT02387021
Adductor Canal Block Versus Femoral Nerve Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT03133481
Analgesic Efficacy of Anterior Femoral, Genicular and Adductor Canal Nerve Block
NCT02548104
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Continuous Adductor Canal Block (CACB)
Continuous Adductor Canal block performed with:
loading dose 0,375% Ropivacaine 15ml (56,25mg) start infusion 0,2% Ropivacaine 6ml/h
Procedure: Femoral Nerve Block. Adductor Canal Block Drug: Ropivacaine
Ropivacaine
Regional Anesthesia performed with 0.375% Ropivacaine 15ml (56,25mg)
Continuous Femoral Nerve Block (CFNB)
Continuous Femoral Nerve Block performed with:
loading dose 0,375% Ropivacaine 15ml (56,25mg) start infusion 0,2% Ropivacaine 6ml/h
Procedure: Femoral Nerve Block. Adductor Canal Block Drug: Ropivacaine
Ropivacaine
Regional Anesthesia performed with 0.375% Ropivacaine 15ml (56,25mg)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ropivacaine
Regional Anesthesia performed with 0.375% Ropivacaine 15ml (56,25mg)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* informed consent
* preoperative "timed up and go" test performable
Exclusion Criteria
* BMI \> 40 kg/m2
* American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status (ASA) 4-5
* severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
* rheumatic arthritis, diabetic Polyneuropathy, M. Parkinson
* nerve injury of lumbosacral plexus
* coagulopathy with bleeding tendency
* not capable of speaking or understanding german or english
50 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Philipps University Marburg
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Karolin Piechowiak
Dr. Karolin Piechowiak
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Karolin Piechowiak, Dr
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Dept. of Anesthesia And Intensiv Care Medicine University of Marburg
Thorsten Steinfeldt, Prof Dr
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Dept. of Anesthesia And Intensive Care Medicine University of Marburg
Thomas Wiesmann, Dr
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Dept. of Anesthesia And Intensive Care Medicine University of Marburg
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Marburg Department of Anaesthesia And Intensive Care Medicine
Marburg, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AZ 06/13
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.