Comparison of Continuous Femoral Nerve Block and Adductor Canal Block After Total Knee Replacement Therapy

NCT ID: NCT02125903

Last Updated: 2015-01-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

44 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-05-31

Study Completion Date

2014-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The blockade of the femoral nerve (FNB) is the most common postoperative pain therapy after total knee replacement. Because of motor-driven weakness of the quadriceps muscle induced by femoral nerve block mobilization of Patients is difficult even dangerous (falls) and hospital stays are extended.

An alternative method could be an adductor canal block (ACB). Anatomical studies of the adductor canal demonstrated that the adductor canal contains the saphenous nerve, a pure sensory nerve for medial and anterior aspects of the knee and the tibia without any motor function.

This prospective, double-blinded, randomized study investigates the effect of FNB and ACB on quadriceps motor weakness and analgesia determined by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS).

We expect the ACB to be superior in muscle strength but equal in pain score. Both groups receive an additional anterior sciatic nerve block for complete sensory block of the operated knee

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Total Knee Arthroplasty Total Knee Replacement Femoral Nerve Block Adductor Canal Block

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Continuous Adductor Canal Block (CACB)

Continuous Adductor Canal block performed with:

loading dose 0,375% Ropivacaine 15ml (56,25mg) start infusion 0,2% Ropivacaine 6ml/h

Procedure: Femoral Nerve Block. Adductor Canal Block Drug: Ropivacaine

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ropivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Regional Anesthesia performed with 0.375% Ropivacaine 15ml (56,25mg)

Continuous Femoral Nerve Block (CFNB)

Continuous Femoral Nerve Block performed with:

loading dose 0,375% Ropivacaine 15ml (56,25mg) start infusion 0,2% Ropivacaine 6ml/h

Procedure: Femoral Nerve Block. Adductor Canal Block Drug: Ropivacaine

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ropivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Regional Anesthesia performed with 0.375% Ropivacaine 15ml (56,25mg)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ropivacaine

Regional Anesthesia performed with 0.375% Ropivacaine 15ml (56,25mg)

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients with knee replacement therapy and general anaesthesia
* informed consent
* preoperative "timed up and go" test performable

Exclusion Criteria

* emergency patients
* BMI \> 40 kg/m2
* American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status (ASA) 4-5
* severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
* rheumatic arthritis, diabetic Polyneuropathy, M. Parkinson
* nerve injury of lumbosacral plexus
* coagulopathy with bleeding tendency
* not capable of speaking or understanding german or english
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Philipps University Marburg

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Karolin Piechowiak

Dr. Karolin Piechowiak

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Karolin Piechowiak, Dr

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Dept. of Anesthesia And Intensiv Care Medicine University of Marburg

Thorsten Steinfeldt, Prof Dr

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Dept. of Anesthesia And Intensive Care Medicine University of Marburg

Thomas Wiesmann, Dr

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Dept. of Anesthesia And Intensive Care Medicine University of Marburg

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Marburg Department of Anaesthesia And Intensive Care Medicine

Marburg, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AZ 06/13

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

High Versus Low Adductor Canal Block
NCT04155983 UNKNOWN PHASE4