Adductor Canal Block With Posterior Capsular Injection for Total Knee Replacement

NCT ID: NCT01805661

Last Updated: 2015-03-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

56 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-03-31

Study Completion Date

2013-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To compare early ambulation and ability to participate in rehabilitation in patients undergoing total knee replacement using two different nerve block techniques for pain control. The 2 methods are 1) Adductor canal block with posterior capsular injection 2) femoral nerve block with tibial nerve block

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Early mobilization in the postoperative period is important to the success of surgery following total knee replacement. However, severe post-operative pain is an impediment to early implementation of rehabilitaion program. The use of femoral nerve block combined with tibial nerve block as part of a multimodal analgesic program provides effective pain control but causes weakness of the operative extremity preventing patients from bearing weight, exercising the leg and increasing the risk of falls thereby delaying early participation in rehabilitation. Adductor canal block is a new technique that has been described to provide pain control after total knee arthroplasty (1). The advantages of this block is that it could potentially minimize lower extremity weakness because the target nerve (saphenous nerve) blocked in this technique is a purely sensory nerve and does not provide any motor innervation to any muscle groups. Adductor canal block lends itself easily to providing prolonged analgesia because a perineural catheter can be inserted and the block maintained by a continuous infusion of dilute local anesthetic solution for days. A disadvantage of this method is that it may not provide adequate analgesia for posterior knee pain in the early postoperative period. By combining adductor canal block with ultrasound guided posterior and antero-medial knee injection, the posterior knee pain can be controlled effectively. Posterior and antero-medial knee injection of local anesthetic solution has been used as a method of controlling posterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty (2).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain Osteoarthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Femoral With Tibial Nerve Block

Continuous femoral nerve block with catheter and selective tibial nerve block in the popliteal fossa

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Femoral with Tibial Nerve Block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Continuous femoral nerve block with 15 ml of ropivacaine 0.1% followed by an infusion of ropivacaine 0.1% at 6 ml per hour for 2 days after surgery combined with tibial nerve block in the popliteal fossa with ropivacaine 0.1% up to 15 ml.

Canal Block and Capsular Injection

Adductor canal block with a continuous catheter and ultrasound guided posterior capsular injection with local anesthetic solution.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Canal Block and Capsular Injection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Continuous Adductor canal block with 15-30ml of ropivacaine 0.1% with epinephrine 1:400,000 followed by an infusion of ropivacaine 0.1% at 6 ml per hour for 2 days post operatively. This is combined with ultrasound guided posterior capsular knee injection with 30 ml ropivacaine 0.1% with epinephrine 1:400,000.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Canal Block and Capsular Injection

Continuous Adductor canal block with 15-30ml of ropivacaine 0.1% with epinephrine 1:400,000 followed by an infusion of ropivacaine 0.1% at 6 ml per hour for 2 days post operatively. This is combined with ultrasound guided posterior capsular knee injection with 30 ml ropivacaine 0.1% with epinephrine 1:400,000.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Femoral with Tibial Nerve Block

Continuous femoral nerve block with 15 ml of ropivacaine 0.1% followed by an infusion of ropivacaine 0.1% at 6 ml per hour for 2 days after surgery combined with tibial nerve block in the popliteal fossa with ropivacaine 0.1% up to 15 ml.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients having primary, unilateral total knee arthroplasty
* ages 18 - 80

Exclusion Criteria

* history of neurological disease
* neuropathy
* diabetes
* major systemic illness
* pregnancy
* chronic narcotic use
* allergy to local anesthetic solution or NSAIDS
* inability to give consent or cooperate with the study protocol
* BMI\> 40
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Trinity Health Of New England

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sanjay Sinha, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Saint Francis Hospital and Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Saint Francis Hospital and Medical Center

Hartford, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

12-10-002

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.