How Does the Addition of Adductor Canal Block to Local Infiltration Affect Recovery in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Feasibility Study.

NCT ID: NCT04648072

Last Updated: 2023-05-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-11-04

Study Completion Date

2021-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The use of periarticular injection and adductor canal block are well-established techniques used both in combination or in isolation in the management of postoperative pain for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. The aim of this study is to investigate whether combining these two techniques have an added benefit, compared to periarticular injection alone, with respect to quality of recovery, functional return, discharge readiness, and short and long term post-operative narcotic use.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study is a double blinded, randomized control trial. In order to create a blinded study, each participant will receive two injections; a single shot adductor canal block (ACB) and a periarticular injection (PI). All syringes will be non-identifiable to the surgeon, anesthetist and the patient.

Specifically, the two arms are:

Arm 1: PI (Ropivacaine + Ketorolac + Epinepherine) + ACB (Ropivacaine)

Arm 2: PI (Ropivacaine + Ketorolac + Epinepherine) + ACB (Normal Saline)

The aim of this study is to investigate whether combining these two techniques have an added benefit, compared to periarticular injection alone. The investigators hypothesize that the addition of an adductor canal block will translate to a superior quality of recovery, as well as an improvement in functional return, discharge readiness and less short-term and long-term post-operative narcotic use.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Knee Osteoarthritis Arthritis Knee Knee Disease Opioid Use

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomized control trial. Two arms of 30 participants will be included in this study. The experimental arm will receive both the periarticular injection and the adductor canal block with local anesthetic, while the control group will receive the periarticular injection and a sham adductor canal block with normal saline.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
Sealed envelopes.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Periarticular Injection + Adductor Canal Block (Local Anesthestic)

The experimental arm with receive both the periarticular injection and the adductor canal block.

The periarticular injection will be performed by the surgeon and will consist of 100 mL of injectate being distributed in the following manner: 30 mL to the posterior capsule, 10 mL to the medial collateral ligament, 10mL to the lateral collateral ligament (ensuring not to infiltrate common peroneal nerve), 20mL to the quadriceps and anterior capsule, and 30 mL to the subcutaneous tissue. The periarticular injection will consist of 250 mg of ropivacaine, 30 mg of ketorolac, and 0.5 mg of epinephrine.

The adductor canal block will be completed by the anesthesiologist after spinal anesthesia has been initiated, but before the surgery commences. The block will be completed using an aseptic technique under dynamic, in-plane US guidance. 20 mL of injectate consisting of 100mg of ropivicaine and 50 mcg of epinephrine will be injected around the hyperechoic saphenous nerve.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Adductor Canal Block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

As previously described.

Periarticular Injection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

As previously described.

Periarticular Injection + Adductor Canal Block (Normal Saline)

The control arm with receive a periarticular injection and a sham adductor canal block.

The periarticular injection will be carried out in the same manner as described for the experimental group. The technical aspects of the sham adductor canal block will be the same as for the experimental arm; however, the injectate will consist of 20 mL of normal saline.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Adductor Canal Block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

As previously described.

Periarticular Injection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

As previously described.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Adductor Canal Block

As previously described.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Periarticular Injection

As previously described.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients requiring primary total knee arthroplasty
2. Patients interested in being part of the study
3. Eligible to receive spinal anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria

1. Age \< 18 years
2. BMI \> 40 kg/m2
3. Deemed unsuitable for regional anesthesia
4. Planned general anesthesia
5. Hepatic insufficiency/Intolerance to acetaminophen
6. Renal insufficiency (defined by eGFR \<60)
7. Chronic opioid use (individuals requiring the equivalent of 1 mg or more of intravenous morphine, or 3 mg or more of oral morphine, per hour for greater than 1 month)
8. Sulpha allergy
9. Allergy or intolerance to trial medications
10. Clinical Frailty Scale Score \> 4
11. Surgery scheduled on a weekend
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Dedicated Anesthesia Research Enhancement Grant

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Health Sciences North Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kim Wong

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kim Wong, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Health Sciences North

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Health Sciences North

Greater Sudbury, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TRUE KnORTH

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Intra-Operative Adductor Canal Blocks
NCT05601427 RECRUITING NA
Adductor Canal Block
NCT04513145 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE2/PHASE3