Adductor Canal Block After Total Knee Replacement - a Suture-method Catheter vs a Standard Catheter vs a Single Bolus

NCT ID: NCT03142789

Last Updated: 2018-05-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

153 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-05-09

Study Completion Date

2018-04-12

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In this study we wish to investigate the analgesic effect of the administration of 0.2% ropivacaine for an adductor canal block as repeated boluses (20 ml every 8 hours) through a new suture-method catheter or a standard perineural catheter compared with a single bolus (20 ml), in patients following primary total knee arthroplasty.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aim of the study is to compare the clinical effects of three different administration forms for an ACB: repeated intermittent boluses through a Certa catheter (CC) versus repeated boluses through a standard catheter (through the needle) (SC) versus a single bolus (SB). Our dual hypothesis is that repeated boluses through a catheter (either Certa or standard catheter) reduces opioid consumption (primary outcome), as well as reduces pain scores, enhances ambulation and muscle strength compared with a single bolus, and that the Certa catheter is superior to a standard catheter.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain Management

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

The study is performed as a blinded, randomized, controlled study. Randomization will be based on a computer-generated block randomization list in a 1:1:1 ratio, block sizes of 9. A person, not otherwise involved in the study, will prepare the randomization list and keep it, locked away in a secure place. 2 sets of consecutively numbered, sealed, opaque, code envelopes will be prepared by the same person.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors
Please see "Model Description"

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Certa Catheter

A Certa-catheter (suture method) is inserted under ultrasound guidance at the midthigh level in the adductor canal, using an in plane technique, short/oblique axis view.

A bolus of ropivacaine will be administered during real time US imaging to ensure correct placement of the catheter (initial bolus). An infusion pump will be connected immediately following catheter insertion, delivering intermittent boluses every 8 hours until 12 pm on POD2.

2 dressings will be applied (medial and lateral) to obscure which catheter has been placed.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Initial bolus (Certa and standard catheter groups)

Intervention Type DRUG

10 ml of ropivacaine 0,75% will be used to ensure correct position of the needle and to expand the adductor canal, followed by injection of another 10 ml of ropivacaine 0.75% via the catheter during real time US imaging to ensure correct placement of the catheter.

Intermittent boluses (Certa and standard catheter groups)

Intervention Type DRUG

20 ml of ropivacaine 0.2% every 8 hour in the catheter

Standard Catheter

A Standard-catheter is inserted under ultrasound guidance at the midthigh level in the adductor canal, using an in plane technique, short/oblique axis view.

A bolus of ropivacaine will be administered during real time US imaging to ensure correct placement of the catheter (initial bolus). An infusion pump will be connected immediately following catheter insertion, delivering intermittent boluses every 8 hours until 12 pm on POD2.

2 dressings will be applied (medial and lateral) to obscure which catheter has been placed.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Initial bolus (Certa and standard catheter groups)

Intervention Type DRUG

10 ml of ropivacaine 0,75% will be used to ensure correct position of the needle and to expand the adductor canal, followed by injection of another 10 ml of ropivacaine 0.75% via the catheter during real time US imaging to ensure correct placement of the catheter.

Intermittent boluses (Certa and standard catheter groups)

Intervention Type DRUG

20 ml of ropivacaine 0.2% every 8 hour in the catheter

Single Bolus

A bolus of ropivacaine will be injected into the adductor canal, at the midthigh level, using a 80 mm x 22G Pajunk needle during real time US imaging (initial bolus).

A sham catheter (25 Certa and 25 standard catheters according to randomi-zation) will be fixed externally and covered by dressings as in the catheter groups groups (Certa and standard). Care will be taken to use approximately the same amount of time as used in the catheter groups (Certa and standard) An infusion pump will be connected immediately following catheter insertion, delivering intermittent boluses into the dressing every 8 hour until 12 PM on POD2.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Initial bolus (Single bolus group)

Intervention Type DRUG

20 ml of ropivacaine 0.75%

Intermittent boluses (Single bolus group)

Intervention Type DRUG

0.1ml of ropivacaine 0.2% every 8 hour in the sham catheter

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Initial bolus (Certa and standard catheter groups)

10 ml of ropivacaine 0,75% will be used to ensure correct position of the needle and to expand the adductor canal, followed by injection of another 10 ml of ropivacaine 0.75% via the catheter during real time US imaging to ensure correct placement of the catheter.

Intervention Type DRUG

Initial bolus (Single bolus group)

20 ml of ropivacaine 0.75%

Intervention Type DRUG

Intermittent boluses (Certa and standard catheter groups)

20 ml of ropivacaine 0.2% every 8 hour in the catheter

Intervention Type DRUG

Intermittent boluses (Single bolus group)

0.1ml of ropivacaine 0.2% every 8 hour in the sham catheter

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients scheduled for unilateral total knee arthroplasty in spinal anesthesia
* Patients who gave their written informed consent to participating in the study after having fully understood the contents of the protocol and restrictions
* ASA 1-3
* Ability to perform a TUG test preoperatively

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who cannot cooperate
* Patients who cannot understand or speak Danish.
* Patients with allergy to the medicines used in the study
* Patients with a daily intake of strong opioids (morphine, oxycodone, ketobemidone, methadone, fentanyl) during the last 4 weeks
* Patients suffering from alcohol and/or drug abuse - based on the investigator's assessment
* Rheumatoid arthritis
* BMI \> 40
* Neuromuscular pathology in the lower limbs
* Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ulrik Grevstad

MD, phd

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ulrik Grevstad, MD, phd

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Gentofte Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Gentofte Hospital

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lyngeraa TS, Jaeger P, Gottschau B, Graungaard B, Rossen-Jorgensen AM, Toftegaard I, Grevstad U. Comparison of the analgesic effect of an adductor canal block using a new suture-method catheter vs. standard perineural catheter vs. single-injection: a randomised, blinded, controlled study. Anaesthesia. 2019 Nov;74(11):1397-1405. doi: 10.1111/anae.14814. Epub 2019 Aug 29.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31465115 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EudraCT number: 2016-005069-30

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Intra-Operative Adductor Canal Blocks
NCT05601427 RECRUITING NA