A Comparison of Anaesthetic Methods for Total Knee Replacement Surgery

NCT ID: NCT02249481

Last Updated: 2019-09-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

6 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-12-08

Study Completion Date

2017-06-27

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Open-labelled, randomised controlled trial. Patients will be assessed pre-operatively, at 24 and 48 hours for the primary outcome and secondary outcomes (except for Oxford Knee Score which will be assessed pre-operatively and at 6 months post-operatively by the ortho-paedic team).

Primary Objective: To demonstrate whether adductor canal nerve infusions result in superior patient mobilisation within the first 48 hours following total knee replacement compared to femoral nerve catheter infusions.

Secondary Objective: To identify whether adductor canal nerve infusions result in superior analgesia within the first 48 hours following total knee replacement compared to femoral nerve catheter infusions.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

We are comparing a continuous adductor canal block with a low concentration continuous femoral nerve block. We currently use a low dose femoral nerve catheter based technique as part of our standard treatment strategy for total knee arthroplasty. The use of a catheter provides prolonged analgesia compared to a single shot block, and also allows a lower concentration of local anaesthetic to be employed, thus potentially reducing the incidence of motor blockade. The concentration of local anaesthetic employed in our routine practice (0.0625% L- Bupivacaine) is lower than that routinely used in many other centres, and most clinical studies have compared higher concentrations of local anaesthetic - this might be expected to produce more motor blockade. The concentration we use is higher than the minimum effective concentration for a femoral catheter infusion for knee arthroplasty.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Total Knee Replacement

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group F

Femoral nerve catheter delivering 0.0625% L- Bupivacaine: Blockade at level of Femoral crease. Identify femoral nerve. In plane lateral approach. Bolus 20 mls via needle. Catheter threaded and 2-4cm left in situ (bevel orientated cephalad).and 5 mls injected via catheter to confirm spread under ultrasound guidance. Glue/Lockit dressing.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Femoral nerve catheter delivering 0.0625% L- Bupivacaine

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Femoral nerve catheter: Blockade at level of Femoral crease. Identify femoral nerve. In plane lateral approach. Bolus 20 mls via needle. Catheter threaded and 2-4cm left in situ (bevel orientated cephalad).and 5 mls injected via catheter to confirm spread under ultrasound guidance. Glue/Lockit dressing.

Group A

Adductor canal catheter delivering 0.0625% L- Bupivacaine: Blockade at mid-thigh. Identify sartorius at mid thigh - find point where the femoral artery begins to descend from sartorius. In plane technique, hydro-dissect space between sartorius and femoral artery. Catheter threaded and 2-4cm left in situ (bevel orientated cephalad). Bolus 20 mls via needle and 5 mls via catheter to confirm spread under ultrasound guidance. Glue/Lockit dressing.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Adductor Canal catheter delivering 0.0625% L- Bupivacaine

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Adductor canal catheter: Blockade at mid-thigh. Identify sartorius at mid thigh - find point where the femoral artery begins to descend from sartorius. In plane technique, hydro-dissect space between sartorius and femoral artery. Catheter threaded and 2-4cm left in situ (bevel orientated cephalad). Bolus 20 mls via needle and 5 mls via catheter to confirm spread under ultrasound guidance. Glue/Lockit dressing.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Adductor Canal catheter delivering 0.0625% L- Bupivacaine

Adductor canal catheter: Blockade at mid-thigh. Identify sartorius at mid thigh - find point where the femoral artery begins to descend from sartorius. In plane technique, hydro-dissect space between sartorius and femoral artery. Catheter threaded and 2-4cm left in situ (bevel orientated cephalad). Bolus 20 mls via needle and 5 mls via catheter to confirm spread under ultrasound guidance. Glue/Lockit dressing.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Femoral nerve catheter delivering 0.0625% L- Bupivacaine

Femoral nerve catheter: Blockade at level of Femoral crease. Identify femoral nerve. In plane lateral approach. Bolus 20 mls via needle. Catheter threaded and 2-4cm left in situ (bevel orientated cephalad).and 5 mls injected via catheter to confirm spread under ultrasound guidance. Glue/Lockit dressing.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Adductor Canal Block (0.0625% L- Bupivacaine) Femoral nerve Block (0.0625% L- Bupivacaine)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subject has a diagnosis of rheumatoid or osteoarthritis and listed for a primary total knee replacement.
* Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.
* Male or Female, aged between 18 and 85 years.
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score I-III
* Able (in the clinical staff's opinion) and willing to comply with all study requirements.
* Willing to allow his or her General Practitioner and consultant, if appropriate, to be noti-fied of participation in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient refusal
* Chronic pain (defined as consumption of \>480mg codeine/24hrs or ANY regular strong opiate consumption by the oral/transdermal route)
* Patients aged \<18 or \>85
* ASA score \>III
* Body mass index (BMI) \>35
* Lacking mental capacity to give consent to enter trial/undergo surgery
* Contraindications to catheter placement (coagulopathy , systemic sepsis or infection at placement site, pre-existing neuropathy) or any other component to the study treatment pathway.
* Participant who is terminally ill
* Allergy/intolerance to study medications
* Any other significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may either put the participants at risk because of participation in the study, or may influence the result of the study, or the participant's ability to participate in the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Matt Oldman, MB BS, FRCA

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust

Plymouth, Devon, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

14/P/132

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Adductor Canal Block
NCT04513145 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE2/PHASE3