Protracted Effect of the Ultrasound-guided Saphenous Block

NCT ID: NCT02346110

Last Updated: 2016-02-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-04-30

Study Completion Date

2016-02-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study focuses on optimizing the postoperative pain treatment after major foot and ankle surgery by prolonging the duration of the ultrasound-guided saphenous block. The currently used single shot saphenous block only covers half of the pain intensive period from the saphenous territory, which results in a sharp, break-through pain requiring opioids. The hypothesis is that this protracted mixture will keep the patients free of pain without the use of opioids for the entire pain intensive period and thus increase rehabilitation and patients' satisfaction.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Half of the patients will receive a single shot saphenous block with 10 mL bupivacaine-adrenalin and 1 mL of sodium chloride solution, while the other half will receive 10 mL of bupivacaine-adrenalin and 1 mL of dexamethasone.

The block is strictly a sensory block because it is a selective, sub-sartorial saphenous block at mid-thigh level without any anesthetic effect on the femoral nerve.

The adjuvant dexamethasone has increasingly become a subject of interest regarding a protracted effect, which has been shown in several studies. However, the precise mechanism of action remains speculative, and the results are contradictory regarding the discussion whether the effect is systemic or local. The effect may stem from decreased nociceptive C-fibre activity via a direct action on glucocorticoid receptors and inhibitory potassium channels. Another suggestion is a vasoconstrictive effect, which reduces the systemic uptake of local anaesthetics or a systemic anti-inflammatory effect.

Prolonging the effect of the single shot saphenous block by adding dexamethasone will reduce the need for opioids, which will reduce the risk of adverse effects like nausea, vomiting and respiratory depression. Furthermore, newer studies show that inadequate pain alleviation in the early postoperative period is a risk factor in developing chronic persistent pain.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Arthrosis, Unspecified, Ankle and Foot

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Bupivacaine-adrenalin + sodium chloride

Single shot saphenous block:

10 mL of 5 mg/mL bupivacaine with 5 μg/mL adrenalin = 50 mg bupivacain and 50 μg adrenalin

1 mL sodium chloride solution

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Bupivacaine-adrenaline

Intervention Type DRUG

50 mg bupivacaine and 50 μg adrenalin

Sodium chloride

Intervention Type OTHER

1 mL of sodium chloride solution as placebo

Bupivacaine-adrenaline + Dexamethasone

Single shot saphenous block:

10 mL of 5 mg/mL bupivacaine with 5 μg/mL adrenalin = 50 mg bupivacain and 50 μg adrenalin

1 mL of 4 mg/mL dexamethasone = 4 mg dexamethasone

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Bupivacaine-adrenaline

Intervention Type DRUG

50 mg bupivacaine and 50 μg adrenalin

Dexamethasone

Intervention Type DRUG

4 mg

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bupivacaine-adrenaline

50 mg bupivacaine and 50 μg adrenalin

Intervention Type DRUG

Dexamethasone

4 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

Sodium chloride

1 mL of sodium chloride solution as placebo

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Marcain-adrenalin Dexagalen NaCL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Elective ankle or hind foot surgery either: (1) total ankle arthroplasty, (2) ankle arthrodesis or (3) subtalar arthrodesis
* Age ≥ 18
* American Society of Anaesthesiology Classification I-III
* Informed consent both orally and in writing after the patient has fully understood the protocol and its limitations.

Exclusion Criteria

* Communication problems or dementia
* Allergies to any medical product used in the study
* Neuropathy of the sciatic or femoral nerve prior to the operation
* Morbus Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, diabetic neuropathy, peripheral vascular disease
* BMI \> 35
* Pregnancy
* Daily use of opioids
* Coagulation disorders
* Infection at the site of injection or systemic infection
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Aarhus

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Thomas Fichtner Bendtsen, MD, phD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Anesthesiology, Aarhus University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Anesthesiology, Aarhus University Hospital

Aarhus, Central Jutland, Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Clendenen SR, Whalen JL. Saphenous nerve innervation of the medial ankle. Local Reg Anesth. 2013 Mar 6;6:13-6. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S42603. Print 2013.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23630434 (View on PubMed)

Joshi GP, Ogunnaike BO. Consequences of inadequate postoperative pain relief and chronic persistent postoperative pain. Anesthesiol Clin North Am. 2005 Mar;23(1):21-36. doi: 10.1016/j.atc.2004.11.013.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15763409 (View on PubMed)

Blumenthal S, Borgeat A, Neudorfer C, Bertolini R, Espinosa N, Aguirre J. Additional femoral catheter in combination with popliteal catheter for analgesia after major ankle surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Mar;106(3):387-93. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq365. Epub 2010 Dec 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21169609 (View on PubMed)

Cepeda MS, Farrar JT, Baumgarten M, Boston R, Carr DB, Strom BL. Side effects of opioids during short-term administration: effect of age, gender, and race. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2003 Aug;74(2):102-12. doi: 10.1016/S0009-9236(03)00152-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12891220 (View on PubMed)

White PF, Issioui T, Skrivanek GD, Early JS, Wakefield C. The use of a continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block after surgery involving the foot and ankle: does it improve the quality of recovery? Anesth Analg. 2003 Nov;97(5):1303-1309. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000082242.84015.D4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14570643 (View on PubMed)

Richman JM, Liu SS, Courpas G, Wong R, Rowlingson AJ, McGready J, Cohen SR, Wu CL. Does continuous peripheral nerve block provide superior pain control to opioids? A meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2006 Jan;102(1):248-57. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000181289.09675.7D.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16368838 (View on PubMed)

Ya Deau JT, Wukovits BU, LaSala VR, Jules-Elysee KM, Paroli L, Kahn RL, Levine DS, Lipnitsky JY. Similar analgesic effect after popliteal fossa nerve blockade with 0.375% and 0.75% bupivacaine. HSS J. 2007 Sep;3(2):173-6. doi: 10.1007/s11420-007-9052-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18751790 (View on PubMed)

Borgeat A, Blumenthal S, Lambert M, Theodorou P, Vienne P. The feasibility and complications of the continuous popliteal nerve block: a 1001-case survey. Anesth Analg. 2006 Jul;103(1):229-33, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000221462.87951.8d.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16790658 (View on PubMed)

Jaeger P, Zaric D, Fomsgaard JS, Hilsted KL, Bjerregaard J, Gyrn J, Mathiesen O, Larsen TK, Dahl JB. Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block for analgesia after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blind study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013 Nov-Dec;38(6):526-32. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000015.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24121608 (View on PubMed)

Kwofie MK, Shastri UD, Gadsden JC, Sinha SK, Abrams JH, Xu D, Salviz EA. The effects of ultrasound-guided adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block on quadriceps strength and fall risk: a blinded, randomized trial of volunteers. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;38(4):321-5. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318295df80.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23788068 (View on PubMed)

Jaeger P, Nielsen ZJ, Henningsen MH, Hilsted KL, Mathiesen O, Dahl JB. Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block and quadriceps strength: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology. 2013 Feb;118(2):409-15. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318279fa0b.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23241723 (View on PubMed)

Bendtsen TF, Moriggl B, Chan V, Pedersen EM, Borglum J. Defining adductor canal block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2014 May-Jun;39(3):253-4. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000052. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24747312 (View on PubMed)

Chen J, Lesser J, Hadzic A, Resta-Flarer F. The importance of the proximal saphenous nerve block for foot and ankle surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;38(4):372. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318295596a. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23788076 (View on PubMed)

Forster JG, Rosenberg PH. Clinically useful adjuvants in regional anaesthesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2003 Oct;16(5):477-86. doi: 10.1097/00001503-200310000-00007.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17021500 (View on PubMed)

Choi S, Rodseth R, McCartney CJ. Effects of dexamethasone as a local anaesthetic adjuvant for brachial plexus block: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Mar;112(3):427-39. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet417. Epub 2014 Jan 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24413428 (View on PubMed)

Movafegh A, Razazian M, Hajimaohamadi F, Meysamie A. Dexamethasone added to lidocaine prolongs axillary brachial plexus blockade. Anesth Analg. 2006 Jan;102(1):263-7. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000189055.06729.0a.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16368840 (View on PubMed)

Albrecht E, Kern C, Kirkham KR. A systematic review and meta-analysis of perineural dexamethasone for peripheral nerve blocks. Anaesthesia. 2015 Jan;70(1):71-83. doi: 10.1111/anae.12823. Epub 2014 Aug 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25123271 (View on PubMed)

Desmet M, Braems H, Reynvoet M, Plasschaert S, Van Cauwelaert J, Pottel H, Carlier S, Missant C, Van de Velde M. I.V. and perineural dexamethasone are equivalent in increasing the analgesic duration of a single-shot interscalene block with ropivacaine for shoulder surgery: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Sep;111(3):445-52. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet109. Epub 2013 Apr 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23587875 (View on PubMed)

Kawanishi R, Yamamoto K, Tobetto Y, Nomura K, Kato M, Go R, Tsutsumi YM, Tanaka K, Takeda Y. Perineural but not systemic low-dose dexamethasone prolongs the duration of interscalene block with ropivacaine: a prospective randomized trial. Local Reg Anesth. 2014 Apr 5;7:5-9. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S59158. eCollection 2014.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24817819 (View on PubMed)

Cummings KC 3rd, Napierkowski DE, Parra-Sanchez I, Kurz A, Dalton JE, Brems JJ, Sessler DI. Effect of dexamethasone on the duration of interscalene nerve blocks with ropivacaine or bupivacaine. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Sep;107(3):446-53. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer159. Epub 2011 Jun 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21676892 (View on PubMed)

Vieira PA, Pulai I, Tsao GC, Manikantan P, Keller B, Connelly NR. Dexamethasone with bupivacaine increases duration of analgesia in ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus blockade. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Mar;27(3):285-8. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283350c38.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20009936 (View on PubMed)

Rahangdale R, Kendall MC, McCarthy RJ, Tureanu L, Doty R Jr, Weingart A, De Oliveira GS Jr. The effects of perineural versus intravenous dexamethasone on sciatic nerve blockade outcomes: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Anesth Analg. 2014 May;118(5):1113-9. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000137.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24686045 (View on PubMed)

Shrestha BR, Maharjan SK, Tabedar S. Supraclavicular brachial plexus block with and without dexamethasone - a comparative study. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2003 Jul-Sep;1(3):158-60.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16388222 (View on PubMed)

Parrington SJ, O'Donnell D, Chan VW, Brown-Shreves D, Subramanyam R, Qu M, Brull R. Dexamethasone added to mepivacaine prolongs the duration of analgesia after supraclavicular brachial plexus blockade. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010 Sep-Oct;35(5):422-6. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181e85eb9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20814282 (View on PubMed)

Tandoc MN, Fan L, Kolesnikov S, Kruglov A, Nader ND. Adjuvant dexamethasone with bupivacaine prolongs the duration of interscalene block: a prospective randomized trial. J Anesth. 2011 Oct;25(5):704-9. doi: 10.1007/s00540-011-1180-x. Epub 2011 Jun 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21681533 (View on PubMed)

Persec J, Persec Z, Kopljar M, Zupcic M, Sakic L, Zrinjscak IK, Marinic DK. Low-dose dexamethasone with levobupivacaine improves analgesia after supraclavicular brachial plexus blockade. Int Orthop. 2014 Jan;38(1):101-5. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2094-z. Epub 2013 Sep 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24173676 (View on PubMed)

Kim YJ, Lee GY, Kim DY, Kim CH, Baik HJ, Heo S. Dexamathasone added to levobupivacaine improves postoperative analgesia in ultrasound guided interscalene brachial plexus blockade for arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012 Feb;62(2):130-4. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2012.62.2.130. Epub 2012 Feb 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22379567 (View on PubMed)

Barrington MJ, Watts SA, Gledhill SR, Thomas RD, Said SA, Snyder GL, Tay VS, Jamrozik K. Preliminary results of the Australasian Regional Anaesthesia Collaboration: a prospective audit of more than 7000 peripheral nerve and plexus blocks for neurologic and other complications. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 Nov-Dec;34(6):534-41. doi: 10.1097/aap.0b013e3181ae72e8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19916206 (View on PubMed)

Barrington MJ, Kluger R. Ultrasound guidance reduces the risk of local anesthetic systemic toxicity following peripheral nerve blockade. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;38(4):289-99. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318292669b.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23788067 (View on PubMed)

Compere V, Rey N, Baert O, Ouennich A, Fourdrinier V, Roussignol X, Beccari R, Dureuil B. Major complications after 400 continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blocks for post-operative analgesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009 Mar;53(3):339-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01849.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19243320 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2014-004207-78

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

ProtokolSB1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.