Inflammatory Response Under Spinal vs General Anesthesia in PCNL: NLR, RDW, LAR.
NCT ID: NCT07205224
Last Updated: 2025-11-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
90 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-09-22
2025-10-22
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of Spinal vs General Anesthesia on Systemic Inflammation in PCNL
NCT07326670
The Effect of Preoperative NLR Level on Epidural Analgesia Application in Thoracotomy
NCT05209958
Effect of Anesthesia Method on Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio
NCT05628935
Spinal Versus General Anesthesia and Inflammatory Response Measured by Delta Neutrophil Index in Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Observational Study
NCT07214558
NLR and Sevoflurane Use in Ear Surgeries: Flow Comparison
NCT07064642
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Sampling windows:
Preoperative: within ≤6 hours before surgery
Postoperative: first sample obtained within 6-24 hours after surgery Parameters: NLR (neutrophil/lymphocyte), RDW, LAR; plus age, sex, ASA class, operative time, and in-hospital complications.
Statistics: Normality testing; between-group comparisons by independent t-test or Mann-Whitney U; within-group by paired t-test or Wilcoxon; categorical by chi-square; p\<0.05 significant. Power considerations target ≥45 per group (total ≥90). No extra biospecimens will be collected beyond routine care.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Spinal Anesthesia Cohort
Adult patients (≥18 years, ASA I-III) undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) under spinal anesthesia. Routine perioperative laboratory values (NLR, RDW, LAR) will be recorded preoperatively and postoperatively.
Anesthesia Type
Patients receive either spinal or general anesthesia according to routine clinical decision-making. No investigational drug or device is administered.
General Anesthesia Cohort
Adult patients (≥18 years, ASA I-III) undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) under general anesthesia. Routine perioperative laboratory values (NLR, RDW, LAR) will be recorded preoperatively and postoperatively.
Anesthesia Type
Patients receive either spinal or general anesthesia according to routine clinical decision-making. No investigational drug or device is administered.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Anesthesia Type
Patients receive either spinal or general anesthesia according to routine clinical decision-making. No investigational drug or device is administered.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
ASA physical status I-III
Scheduled for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL)
Provided informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
Known malignancy
Chronic inflammatory or autoimmune disease (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus)
Current immunosuppressive therapy
Pregnancy
18 Years
99 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sevim Şenol Karataş
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sevim Şenol Karataş
Principal Investigator,
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sevim Şenol Karataş
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Elazığ Fethi Sekin City Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Elazığ Fethi Sekin City Hospital
Elâzığ, Merkez, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sankar K, Anand K, Ramani S, Gayathri B. A Randomized Control Trial to Compare Hemodynamic Parameters of Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Under Combined Spinal-Epidural and General Anesthesia in a Tertiary Hospital. Local Reg Anesth. 2023 May 18;16:41-49. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S410510. eCollection 2023.
Wongyingsinn M, Kohmongkoludom P, Trakarnsanga A, Horthongkham N. Postoperative clinical outcomes and inflammatory markers after inguinal hernia repair using local, spinal, or general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2020 Nov 30;15(11):e0242925. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242925. eCollection 2020.
Indra Rachman R, Birowo P, Nurullah G, Cho PSY, Atmoko W, Widyahening IS, Rasyid N. General versus spinal anesthesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. F1000Res. 2023 Nov 1;12:281. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.124704.2. eCollection 2023.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Elazığ Fethi Sekin City Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EFSH-ANES-2025-09-PERCUTANE
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.