The Effects of Two Anesthetic Drugs on Some Enzyme Levels in Patients Undergoing Lower Extremity Surgery
NCT ID: NCT05950555
Last Updated: 2023-08-31
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
90 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-12-30
2023-05-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of Prolonged ischemıa and anesthetıc Agents on Oxidative Stress
NCT06942650
Effects of Anesthesia Techniques on Tissue Oxygenation and Recovery in Lower Abdominal Surgery
NCT07102108
Effects of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol on Pulmonary Mechanics
NCT02330120
Comparison of Total Oxidant and Total Antioxidant Capacities in Low-Flow and High-Flow General Anesthesia
NCT05590312
Low-Flow Desflurane Anesthesia and Its Effects on BIS and Postoperative Cognitive Functions
NCT07212543
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The group to which the patient was included was listed in serially numbered sealed opaque envelopes. Another investigator (not involved in this study and not blinded to group assignment) administered CSEA to patients in a sitting position and opened the envelopes to see which group the patient belonged to, and prepared and administered the drugs to be used during anesthesia. An anesthetist, blinded to the group allocation, was responsible for collecting the intraoperative data. During and after surgery, data were recorded by and by this investigator. The blood of the patients was taken by the researcher who collected the data and delivered to the researchers who made the biochemical analyzes of their blood and blinded the groups. All surgeries were performed by the same surgical team and the same anesthesia team.
Peripheral IV vascular access was established using a 16/18-gauge cannula on the day of the operation. No premedication was applied to any patient before the operation. Before the anesthesia procedure, the patients' age, weight, height, body mass indexes, american society of anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status, systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressure baseline values, heart rate and oxygen saturation levels were recorded.
CSEA was applied to all patients in the sitting position. Following skin sterilization and local anesthetic infiltration (2% lidocaine), an 18-gauge Tuohy needle (CSEA, Braun, Melsungen, Germany) was advanced along the midline L3-4 or L4-5 intervertebral spaces using a loss of resistance technique. After negative pressure was detected, a 27-gauge pen-tipped spinal needle was inserted intrathecally using the needle-through-the-needle technique. After the free cerebrospinal fluid flow was observed, 1.8 ml 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine (9 mg) and 15 µg fentanyl were administered for 30 seconds. Then, the spinal needle was removed and the catheter was inserted into the epidural space, and it was advanced 3-5 cm in the space and controlled with negative pressure, and the catheter was fixed. At the end of the anesthesia procedure, the patients were placed in the supine position for the operation. The necessary study drugs were started to be administered to the patients in accordance with the study group they were assigned to, and infusions were continued throughout the operation.
The level of sensory block was assessed with the pinprick test, and surgery was allowed when the sensory block reached the upper level of the T12-L1 dermatome. If sensory block did not occur within the first 20 minutes following the spinal injection, spinal anesthesia was considered unsuccessful and the patients were excluded from the study. The patients who were excluded from the study were injected with an additional 5 ml of 2% lidocaine solutions through the epidural catheter until the sensory block T12-L1 level was achieved, and the patients were allowed to operate.
If the intrathecal space could not be reached in three unsuccessful attempts, a general anesthesia protocol was planned and patients requiring general anesthesia were excluded from the study.
For the measurement of MDA and HO-1 levels, blood samples taken from the patient groups included in the study were taken for 10-20 minutes for clotting. After the tube was kept in an upright position, it was centrifuged at +4°C at 4000 rpm for 15 minutes. The serum samples obtained were aliquoted and placed in a deep freezer at -80˚Ϲ and kept there until the day of analysis.
Serum malondialdehyde (MDA) and HO-1 levels were measured on the same day in order not to be affected by the variation between days. Serum MDA and HO-1 levels were determined by ELISA method, using "Human MDA ELISA Kit" and Human HO-1 ELISA Kit. measured in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.
In addition, C-reactive protein (CRP) (mg/dl), calcium (mg/dl), alkaline phosphatase (U/L), lactate dehydrogenase (U/L), aspartate aminotransferase (U/L), alanine aminotransferase, which are routinely checked at preoperative, postoperative 2nd and 24th hours. (U/L), glucose (mg/dl), potassium (nmol/L), iron (ug/dl), total protein (g/dl) and albumin (g/dl) levels in Beckman Coulter device, ferritin (ng) /ml) Beckman Coulter device, Blood count parameters, White Blood Cell Count (10\^3/mcL), Total Lymphocyte Count (10\^3/mcL), Hemoglobin (g/dL) were studied on Sysmex device.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients given saline
10 cc/hour isotonic is given throughout the operation.
Saline
We used 0.9% isotonic sodium chloride.
Patients given dexmedetomidine.
Dexmedetomidine 0.1 µg/kg IV bolus followed by 0.2 µg/kg/hr infusion throughout surgery.
Dexmedetomidine
We used the vial containing 200 mcg/2 ml i.v. concentrated infusion solution in 100 ml of 0.9% isotonic sodium chloride.
Patients given ketamine.
Ketamine 0.2 mg/kg bolus followed by 0.1 mg/kg/hr infusion throughout surgery.
Ketamine
We used 500 mg/10 ml solution for injection in 0.9% isotonic sodium chloride.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Saline
We used 0.9% isotonic sodium chloride.
Dexmedetomidine
We used the vial containing 200 mcg/2 ml i.v. concentrated infusion solution in 100 ml of 0.9% isotonic sodium chloride.
Ketamine
We used 500 mg/10 ml solution for injection in 0.9% isotonic sodium chloride.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients who agreed to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who will use bone cement in the surgical procedure
* Patients who will apply a tourniquet to the lower extremity
* Patients with vascular and coronary disease
* Patients with coagulation disorders that would prevent the application of CSEA
* Patients with allergies to the drugs to be used in the study
* Patients with increased head and intraocular pressure
* Patients with psychiatric and neuromuscular disorders
* Patients with multiple trauma
* Patients who did not consent to participate in the study
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ataturk University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mehmet AKSOY
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
İrfan Uç
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Research Assistant
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ataturk University
Erzurum, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
B.30.2.ATA.0.01.00/23
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.