Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
44 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-02-07
2021-03-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The decision of routine anesthesia was not interfered with. The data of the patients were collected as GA group if general anesthesia was applied and SA group if sedoanalgesia was applied. If general anesthesia was preferred, anesthesia induction was performed with propofol, fentanyl and rocuronium, and sevoflurane was used for anesthesia maintenance. Intravenous midazolam and dexmedetomidine infusions were administered to patients for whom sedoanalgesia was preferred. The sedation level of these patients was followed up with the Ramsay sedation scale (RSS) and capnography monitoring was performed.
Whether general anesthesia or sedoanalgesia was preferred, local anesthesia was administered to all patients by the surgical team and intraoperative hemodynamic data (mean arterial pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation) were followed.
In addition to patients recruited for the study, hemodynamic data after induction, endotracheal intubation, surgical incision, and extubation were also recorded.
Depth of anesthesia was monitored with a bispectral index monitor for both groups.
Intraoperative bleeding amount, canal damage, etc. Intraoperative complications such as In this study, the pain levels of the patients were evaluated by visual pain score (VAS) at 0 and 30 minutes, 1st, 4th, 8th and 12th hours. Analgesic requirement, postoperative nausea-vomiting and time, duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, surgery-related complications (ecchymosis, epistaxis, hematoma, edema, etc.) were recorded. Patient and surgical team satisfaction of the patients was evaluated using a 5-point Likert Scale.
The necessary measurements of the eyes and adnexa (visual acuity, meibomian gland measurement, tear breakout time, schirmer) for which detailed eye examinations of the patients will be performed preoperatively and postoperatively on the 1st day, 1st week, 1st month, 3rd month and 6th month. tests, intraocular pressure, pupil width, lens density, corneal topography, anterior and posterior segment Optical coherence tomography, etc.) tear duct examination and lavage were performed. The patient's complaints about eye diseases were recorded. As a result of the study, in addition to local anesthesia in DCR surgery, sedoanalgesia and general anesthesia methods were compared.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
sedoanalgesia(SA group)
Sedoanalgesia was applied to the SA group
Controlled sedoanalgesia
Controlled sedoanalgesia was applied with Bispectral index and dexmedetomidine
general anaesthesia (GA group)
General anaesthesia was applied to the GA group
Controlled sedoanalgesia
Controlled sedoanalgesia was applied with Bispectral index and dexmedetomidine
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Controlled sedoanalgesia
Controlled sedoanalgesia was applied with Bispectral index and dexmedetomidine
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* 18 years and older patients
* Having an American Society of Anesthesiology score of 1, 2, 3
* Having approved and signed the informed consent form
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with an American Society of Anesthesiology score of 4 and above
* Patients who do not accept informed consent
* History of drug allergy and opioid tolerance
* Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
* Coagulation disorder
* Cases with severe liver and kidney disease
* Those who refused to participate in the study
* They will have DCR surgery again
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Turkish Society of Anesthesiology and Reanimation
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Tip Fakültesi
Bursa, Ni̇lüfer, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ciftci F, Pocan S, Karadayi K, Gulecek O. Local versus general anesthesia for external dacryocystorhinostomy in young patients. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 May;21(3):201-6. doi: 10.1097/01.iop.0000163317.73873.c9.
Tuladhar S, Adhikari S, Bhattarai BK. Effectiveness of sedation in dacryocystorhinostomy surgery. Nepal J Ophthalmol. 2009 Jan-Jun;1(1):25-31. doi: 10.3126/nepjoph.v1i1.3670.
Scawn RL, Allen MJ, Rose GE, Verity DH. Randomised, masked study of local anaesthesia administered prior to external dacryocystorhinostomy under general anaesthesia. Eye (Lond). 2019 Mar;33(3):374-379. doi: 10.1038/s41433-018-0201-5. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
Eghbal MH, Sahmeddini MA. Comparison larygeal mask airway with the endotracheal tube for the external dacryocystorhionostomy surgery. A randomized clinical trial. Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2013 Oct;22(3):283-8.
Kersey JP, Sleep T, Hodgkins PR. Ocular perforation associated with local anaesthetic for dacryocystorhinostomy. Eye (Lond). 2001 Oct;15(Pt 5):671-2. doi: 10.1038/eye.2001.213. No abstract available.
Apan A, Doganci N, Ergan A, Buyukkocak U. Bispectral index-guided intraoperative sedation with dexmedetomidine and midazolam infusion in outpatient cataract surgery. Minerva Anestesiol. 2009 May;75(5):239-44. Epub 2008 Dec 17.
Harissi-Dagher M, Boulos P, Hardy I, Guay J. Comparison of anesthetic and surgical outcomes of dacryocystorhinostomy using loco-regional versus general anesthesia. Digit J Ophthalmol. 2008 Jan 1;14:1-6. doi: 10.5693/djo.01.2008.001. eCollection 2008.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
uludaganesthesia
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id