Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
40 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-05-15
2023-05-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Different Positioning Before, During and After Surgery on Pressure Injury
NCT05549830
Comparison of PEEP Effect on Perioperative Oxygenation and Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Lithotomy Position
NCT05261295
Fluid Responsiveness in Prone Position
NCT05401526
Is Effective Preoxygenation in Elderly Patients Related to Position?
NCT05659758
NIRS and Anesthesiology
NCT05978310
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Hemodynamic measurements are performed using the Pressure Recording Analytical Method (PRAM), a minimally invasive technique that allows continuous assessment of parameters such as mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), cardiac index (CI), pulse pressure variation (PPV), stroke volume variation (SVV), stroke volume index (SVI), cardiac contractility parameters (dP/dtmax), arterial elastance (Ea), cardiac power index (CPI), and cardiac cycle efficiency (CCE). Each patient is sequentially positioned in the three surgical positions while awake, and the same measurements are repeated after the induction of general anesthesia in the corresponding positions.
The primary aim is to determine how surgical positioning under general anesthesia alters key cardiovascular parameters. Secondary objectives include comparing hemodynamic changes across positions in both conscious and anesthetized states, identifying potential risks associated with specific positions, and guiding intraoperative patient management to improve safety and outcomes in PCNL procedures.
The study is conducted at a single center and includes adult patients with ASA physical status I-II scheduled for elective PCNL surgery. The findings are expected to provide valuable data for anesthesiologists and surgeons to optimize perioperative cardiovascular stability, particularly during position changes in urological surgeries.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CROSSOVER
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Hemodynamic Response to Position Changes
Hemodynamic variables-including mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), cardiac index (CI), stroke volume index (SVI), pulse pressure variation (PPV), stroke volume variation (SVV), dP/dtmax, arterial elastance (Ea), cardiac cycle efficiency (CCE), and cardiac power index (CPI)-were continuously monitored. Hemodynamic measurements were obtained at six predefined time points using the Pressure Recording Analytical Method (PRAM).
The first three measurements were recorded during the pre-anesthetic period in the supine, lithotomy, and prone positions, respectively, prior to the induction of anesthesia. The latter three measurements were obtained during the anesthetized period: five minutes after induction while the patient was in the baseline supine position, five minutes after transitioning to the lithotomy position (prior to ureteral catheter placement), and five minutes after repositioning to the prone position, before surgical incision.
Position the patient
In addition, prior to the operation and throughout the PCNL procedure, hemodynamic measurements were obtained while patients were positioned in the supine, lithotomy, and prone positions, as necessitated by the surgical protocol.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Position the patient
In addition, prior to the operation and throughout the PCNL procedure, hemodynamic measurements were obtained while patients were positioned in the supine, lithotomy, and prone positions, as necessitated by the surgical protocol.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Participants must be scheduled to undergo elective percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) surgery.
Exclusion Criteria
Participants with renal failure will be excluded. Participants who received colloid fluid administration prior to surgery will be excluded.
Participants using vasoactive or inotropic drugs will be excluded.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ataturk University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Erkan Cem ÇELİK
Associate Professor MD.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Atatürk University Faculty of Medicine
Erzurum, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lee S, Kim DY, Han J, Kim K, You AH, Kang HY, Park SW, Kim MK, Kim JE, Choi JH. Hemodynamic changes in the prone position according to fluid loading after anaesthesia induction in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery: a randomized, assessor-blind, prospective study. Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2356645. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2356645. Epub 2024 May 24.
Romagnoli S, Franchi F, Ricci Z, Scolletta S, Payen D. The Pressure Recording Analytical Method (PRAM): Technical Concepts and Literature Review. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2017 Aug;31(4):1460-1470. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2016.09.004. Epub 2016 Sep 14. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Ataunihemo
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.