Does Anesthetic Technique Affect Pneumatic Tourniquet Pressures in Upper Limb Fracture Surgery?

NCT ID: NCT04710225

Last Updated: 2021-01-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

69 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-10-08

Study Completion Date

2021-01-09

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In pneumatic tourniquet applications, the use of an individualized, lowest-effective tourniquet pressure (TP) has been recommended, in order to avoid pressure related complications. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of general anesthesia and axillary block on arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) estimation based TP settings in upper limb fracture surgery.

After, ethical committee approval 80 adult patients undergoing upper limb fracture surgery who gave their signed informed consent will be included. The age below 18 and above 85 years, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status \>2, any contraindication to axillary block or GA, adverse reaction history to anesthetic drugs, severe anemia, and refusal to give informed consent will be the exclusion criteria. The patients will be randomized to one of two study groups using a computer-generated randomization list to receive GA (Group 1) and axillary block (Group 2).

Main endpoints are initial and maximal blood pressures, AOP, initial and maximal TPs, and tourniquet time. Additionally, the surgeon will evaluate the quality of bloodless surgical area with respect to the amount of blood using a 4-point scale (1: Excellent= No blood in the surgical field, 2: Good= Some blood in the surgical field but no interference with surgery, 3: Fair= Blood in the surgical field but no significant interference with surgery, 4: Poor= Blood in the surgical field obscures the view) at the beginning, in the middle, and at the end of the surgical procedure. The patients will be observed for signs of tourniquet related complications by a blind investigator. SPSS 20.0 for Windows is used for data analysis. The t test and the χ2 test will be used for continuous and categorical data respectively. A P value below 0.05 will be considered as statistically significant.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Initial Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg) Arterial Occlusion Pressure (mmHg) Tourniquet Time (Minutes) Quality of Bloodless Surgical Field (4 Point Scale) Initial Tourniquet Pressure (mmHg) Maximal Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg) Maximal Tourniquet Pressure (mmHg)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1 (General anesthesia group)

Upper limb fracture surgery will be performed with the aid of pneumatic tourniquet. General anesthesia will be induced with intravenous (IV) thiopental sodium and fentanyl.

Rocuronium will be used as the neuromuscular blocking agent. Endotracheal tube will be placed and anesthesia will be maintained with sevoflurane and IV fentanyl while the lungs were ventilated with O2-N2O (50-50%) to achieve an EtCO2 at 30-35 mm Hg.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Upper limb fracture surgery and arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) estimation based tourniquet pressure (TP) setting

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Upper limb fracture surgery will be performed with the aid of a pneumatic tourniquet.

The cuff (11 cm) of the tourniquet will be placed around the arm with the distal edge 5 cm above the olecranon. AOP estimation formula according to initial systolic blood pressure (SBP) and Tissue Padding Coefficient (KTP) values (AOP= \[SBP+10\]/KTP) from a list (Table 1) will be used to calculate AOP (17). After calculation of AOP, a safety margin of 20 mmHg will be added to AOP to determine the TP (TP=AOP+20 mm Hg). Exsanguination of the limb will be provided with an Esmarch bandage and the cuff will be inflated to the predetermined TP. TP will be manually raised in response to each 10 mmHg increase in SBP during the surgical procedure.

Group 2 (Multiple injection axillary block group)

Multiple injection axillary block will be performed with the aid of a nerve stimulator. When the slight twitching of the motor response from the relevant muscles is achieved (at 0.4 mA, 2Hz, 0.1 ms) % 18-20 ml of Bupivacaine 0.5 (90-100 mg) will be injected.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Upper limb fracture surgery and arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) estimation based tourniquet pressure (TP) setting

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Upper limb fracture surgery will be performed with the aid of a pneumatic tourniquet.

The cuff (11 cm) of the tourniquet will be placed around the arm with the distal edge 5 cm above the olecranon. AOP estimation formula according to initial systolic blood pressure (SBP) and Tissue Padding Coefficient (KTP) values (AOP= \[SBP+10\]/KTP) from a list (Table 1) will be used to calculate AOP (17). After calculation of AOP, a safety margin of 20 mmHg will be added to AOP to determine the TP (TP=AOP+20 mm Hg). Exsanguination of the limb will be provided with an Esmarch bandage and the cuff will be inflated to the predetermined TP. TP will be manually raised in response to each 10 mmHg increase in SBP during the surgical procedure.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Upper limb fracture surgery and arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) estimation based tourniquet pressure (TP) setting

Upper limb fracture surgery will be performed with the aid of a pneumatic tourniquet.

The cuff (11 cm) of the tourniquet will be placed around the arm with the distal edge 5 cm above the olecranon. AOP estimation formula according to initial systolic blood pressure (SBP) and Tissue Padding Coefficient (KTP) values (AOP= \[SBP+10\]/KTP) from a list (Table 1) will be used to calculate AOP (17). After calculation of AOP, a safety margin of 20 mmHg will be added to AOP to determine the TP (TP=AOP+20 mm Hg). Exsanguination of the limb will be provided with an Esmarch bandage and the cuff will be inflated to the predetermined TP. TP will be manually raised in response to each 10 mmHg increase in SBP during the surgical procedure.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients undergoing upper limb fracture surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* The age below 18 and above 85 years,
* American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status \>2
* Any contraindication to axillary block or general anesthesia
* Any contraindication to tourniquet use
* Adverse reaction history to anesthetic drugs
* Severe anemia
* Refusal to give informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Baskent University Ankara Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Bahattin Tuncali

Associate professor, MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Baskent University

Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Estebe JP, Davies JM, Richebe P. The pneumatic tourniquet: mechanical, ischaemia-reperfusion and systemic effects. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Jun;28(6):404-11. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328346d5a9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21502865 (View on PubMed)

Odinsson A, Finsen V. Tourniquet use and its complications in Norway. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Aug;88(8):1090-2. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B8.17668.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16877612 (View on PubMed)

Olivecrona C, Blomfeldt R, Ponzer S, Stanford BR, Nilsson BY. Tourniquet cuff pressure and nerve injury in knee arthroplasty in a bloodless field: a neurophysiological study. Acta Orthop. 2013 Apr;84(2):159-64. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2013.782525. Epub 2013 Mar 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23485070 (View on PubMed)

Olivecrona C, Ponzer S, Hamberg P, Blomfeldt R. Lower tourniquet cuff pressure reduces postoperative wound complications after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled study of 164 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Dec 19;94(24):2216-21. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01492.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23318611 (View on PubMed)

Boya H, Tuncali B, Ozcan O, Arac S, Tuncay C. Practice of tourniquet use in Turkey: a pilot study. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2016;50(2):162-70. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2015.15.0066.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26969951 (View on PubMed)

Ding L, Ding CY, Wang YL, Wang ML, Qian XH, Huang L, Xie XE, Ji HZ. Application effect of pneumatic tourniquet with individualized pressure setting in orthopaedic surgery of extremities: A meta-analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2019 Dec;75(12):3424-3433. doi: 10.1111/jan.14196. Epub 2019 Oct 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31524296 (View on PubMed)

Van Roekel HE, Thurston AJ. Tourniquet pressure: the effect of limb circumference and systolic blood pressure. J Hand Surg Br. 1985 Jun;10(2):142-4. doi: 10.1016/0266-7681(85)90002-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 4031590 (View on PubMed)

Pauers RS, Carocci MA. Low pressure pneumatic tourniquets: effectiveness at minimum recommended inflation pressures. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1994 Nov-Dec;33(6):605-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7894409 (View on PubMed)

Shaw JA, Murray DG. The relationship between tourniquet pressure and underlying soft-tissue pressure in the thigh. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982 Oct;64(8):1148-52.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7130227 (View on PubMed)

McLaren AC, Rorabeck CH. The pressure distribution under tourniquets. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985 Mar;67(3):433-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3972869 (View on PubMed)

Hargens AR, McClure AG, Skyhar MJ, Lieber RL, Gershuni DH, Akeson WH. Local compression patterns beneath pneumatic tourniquets applied to arms and thighs of human cadavera. J Orthop Res. 1987;5(2):247-52. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100050211.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3572594 (View on PubMed)

Graham B, Breault MJ, McEwen JA, McGraw RW. Perineural pressures under the pneumatic tourniquet in the upper extremity. J Hand Surg Br. 1992 Jun;17(3):262-6. doi: 10.1016/0266-7681(92)90111-e.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1624856 (View on PubMed)

Estersohn HS, Sourifman HA. The minimum effective midthigh tourniquet pressure. J Foot Surg. 1982 Winter;21(4):281-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7186917 (View on PubMed)

Newman RJ, Muirhead A. A safe and effective low pressure tourniquet. A prospective evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1986 Aug;68(4):625-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.68B4.3525572.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3525572 (View on PubMed)

Tuncali B, Karci A, Bacakoglu AK, Tuncali BE, Ekin A. Controlled hypotension and minimal inflation pressure: a new approach for pneumatic tourniquet application in upper limb surgery. Anesth Analg. 2003 Nov;97(5):1529-1532. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000081660.97731.91.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14570681 (View on PubMed)

Unver B, Karatosun V, Tuncali B. Effects of tourniquet pressure on rehabilitation outcomes in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Nurs. 2013 Jul-Aug;32(4):217-22. doi: 10.1097/NOR.0b013e31829aef2a.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23881019 (View on PubMed)

Tuncali B, Karci A, Tuncali BE, Mavioglu O, Ozkan M, Bacakoglu AK, Baydur H, Ekin A, Elar Z. A new method for estimating arterial occlusion pressure in optimizing pneumatic tourniquet inflation pressure. Anesth Analg. 2006 Jun;102(6):1752-7. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000209018.00998.24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16717321 (View on PubMed)

Tuncali B, Boya H, Kayhan Z, Arac S, Camurdan MA. Clinical utilization of arterial occlusion pressure estimation method in lower limb surgery: effectiveness of tourniquet pressures. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2016;50(2):171-7. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2015.15.0175.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26969952 (View on PubMed)

Tuncali B, Boya H, Kayhan Z, Arac S. Obese patients require higher, but not high pneumatic tourniquet inflation pressures using a novel technique during total knee arthroplasty. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi. 2018 Apr;29(1):40-5. doi: 10.5606/ehc.2018.57973.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29526158 (View on PubMed)

Tuncali B, Boya H, Kayhan Z, Arac S. Tourniquet pressure settings based on limb occlusion pressure determination or arterial occlusion pressure estimation in total knee arthroplasty? A prospective, randomized, double blind trial. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2018 Jul;52(4):256-260. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2018.04.001. Epub 2018 May 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29752149 (View on PubMed)

Besir A, Tugcugil E. Does Tourniquet Time or Pressure Contribute to Intracranial Pressure Increase following Tourniquet Application? Med Princ Pract. 2019;28(1):16-22. doi: 10.1159/000495110. Epub 2018 Nov 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30396181 (View on PubMed)

Neal JM, Gerancher JC, Hebl JR, Ilfeld BM, McCartney CJ, Franco CD, Hogan QH. Upper extremity regional anesthesia: essentials of our current understanding, 2008. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 Mar-Apr;34(2):134-70. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31819624eb.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19282714 (View on PubMed)

Bruce BG, Green A, Blaine TA, Wesner LV. Brachial plexus blocks for upper extremity orthopaedic surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012 Jan;20(1):38-47. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-20-01-038.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22207517 (View on PubMed)

Chan VW, Peng PW, Kaszas Z, Middleton WJ, Muni R, Anastakis DG, Graham BA. A comparative study of general anesthesia, intravenous regional anesthesia, and axillary block for outpatient hand surgery: clinical outcome and cost analysis. Anesth Analg. 2001 Nov;93(5):1181-4. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200111000-00025.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11682392 (View on PubMed)

Gonano C, Kettner SC, Ernstbrunner M, Schebesta K, Chiari A, Marhofer P. Comparison of economical aspects of interscalene brachial plexus blockade and general anaesthesia for arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Sep;103(3):428-33. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep173. Epub 2009 Jul 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19586958 (View on PubMed)

Liu J, Yuan W, Wang X, Royse CF, Gong M, Zhao Y, Zhang H. Peripheral nerve blocks versus general anesthesia for total knee replacement in elderly patients on the postoperative quality of recovery. Clin Interv Aging. 2014 Feb 18;9:341-50. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S56116. eCollection 2014.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24600214 (View on PubMed)

Bergmann I, Heetfeld M, Crozier TA, Schafdecker HG, Pöschl R, Wiese CH, et al. Peripheral nerve blocks give greater hemodynamic stability than general anesthesia for ASA III patients undergoing outpatient knee arthroscopy. Cent Eur J Med 2013; 8:436-42.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Harsanji Drenjancevic I, Drenjancevic D, Davidovic-Cvetko E, Drenjancevic I, Gulam D, Kvolik S. DOES THE ANESTHESIA TECHNIQUE AFFECT ARTERIAL PRESSURE AND REGIONAL CEREBRAL OXYGEN SATURATION DURING SHOULDER ARTHROSCOPY IN THE BEACH CHAIR POSITION? Acta Clin Croat. 2018 Sep;57(3):473-479. doi: 10.20471/acc.2018.57.03.10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31168180 (View on PubMed)

Ozzeybek D, Oztekin S, Mavioglu O, Karaege G, Ozkardesler S, Ozkan M, Canyilmaz M, Elar Z. Comparison of the haemodynamic effects of interscalene block combined with general anaesthesia and interscalene block alone for shoulder surgery. J Int Med Res. 2003 Sep-Oct;31(5):428-33. doi: 10.1177/147323000303100512.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14587312 (View on PubMed)

Crenshaw AG, Hargens AR, Gershuni DH, Rydevik B. Wide tourniquet cuffs more effective at lower inflation pressures. Acta Orthop Scand. 1988 Aug;59(4):447-51. doi: 10.3109/17453678809149401.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3421083 (View on PubMed)

Younger AS, McEwen JA, Inkpen K. Wide contoured thigh cuffs and automated limb occlusion measurement allow lower tourniquet pressures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Nov;(428):286-93. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000142625.82654.b3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15534554 (View on PubMed)

Mittal P, Shenoy S, Sandhu JS. Effect of different cuff widths on the motor nerve conduction of the median nerve: an experimental study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2008 Jan 9;3:1. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-3-1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18182119 (View on PubMed)

Kovar FM, Jaindl M, Oberleitner G, Endler G, Breitenseher J, Prayer D, Kasprian G, Kutscha-Lissberg F. Nerve compression and pain in human volunteers with narrow vs wide tourniquets. World J Orthop. 2015 May 18;6(4):394-9. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i4.394. eCollection 2015 May 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25992317 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KA19/326

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.