Evaluation Of The Analgesia Nociception Index vs. Surgical Pleth Index Under General And Regional Anaesthesia

NCT ID: NCT02744573

Last Updated: 2016-04-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-09-30

Study Completion Date

2012-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

There is a lack of sufficient analgesia monitoring apart from surrogate parameters. The analgesia nociception index (ANI) shall be evaluated under general and regional anaesthesia.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

While sophisticated haemodynamic monitoring as well as depth of neuromuscular block and sedation are established in daily clinical routine monitoring of analgesia remains poorly represented. The surgical pleth index (SPI) algorithm takes into account both central and peripheral sympathetic tone via the normalised heart beat interval and the plethysmographic pulse wave amplitude and has been described before. A more detailed investigation on the SPI and its behaviour under a posture maneuver shows the limitation of the device.

Another device developed calculates the "analgesia nociception index" (ANI) by heart rate variability and was launched into the market in 2010. However, the effect of posture - to our knowledge - has not yet been studied. The change of body positioning during surgery is regularly necessary in order to improve surgical access to anatomic structures. These alterations in positioning are known to be accompanied by changes in haemodynamic parameters.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the ANI in patients undergoing elective surgery in lithotomy position.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain Stress Monitoring

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

General Anaesthesia

ANI and SPI values under general anaesthesia

No interventions assigned to this group

Spinal Anaesthesia

ANI and SPI values under spinal anaesthesia

No interventions assigned to this group

Spinal Anaesthesia + Sedation

ANI and SPI values under spinal anesthesia in combination with sedation

No interventions assigned to this group

Control

ANI and SPI values under no anaesthesia

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ≥ 18 years
* Body mass index (BMI) \< 35 kg m2
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status I-III
* Elective urology and gynaecology surgery in lithotomy position
* 15 healthy volunteers were included in the study as a control group

Exclusion Criteria

* Age \< 18 years
* ASA status IV or higher
* BMI ≥ 35 kg m2
* Chronic heart rhythm disorders
* Implanted pacemakers
* Patients with a history of chronic pain and emergency surgery
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Timo Iden

Dr. med.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Matthias Grünewald, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel

Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Huiku M, Uutela K, van Gils M, Korhonen I, Kymalainen M, Merilainen P, Paloheimo M, Rantanen M, Takala P, Viertio-Oja H, Yli-Hankala A. Assessment of surgical stress during general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2007 Apr;98(4):447-55. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem004. Epub 2007 Feb 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17329347 (View on PubMed)

Ilies C, Ludwigs J, Gruenewald M, Thee C, Hanf J, Hanss R, Steinfath M, Bein B. The effect of posture and anaesthetic technique on the surgical pleth index. Anaesthesia. 2012 May;67(5):508-513. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.07051.x. Epub 2012 Feb 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22324319 (View on PubMed)

Boselli E, Daniela-Ionescu M, Begou G, Bouvet L, Dabouz R, Magnin C, Allaouchiche B. Prospective observational study of the non-invasive assessment of immediate postoperative pain using the analgesia/nociception index (ANI). Br J Anaesth. 2013 Sep;111(3):453-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet110. Epub 2013 Apr 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23592690 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ANI_SPI

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.