COMparison of Portable Fingertip Versus Conventional Pulse OximeteRs Trial

NCT ID: NCT03496493

Last Updated: 2019-02-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

220 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-04-15

Study Completion Date

2018-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Perioperative non-invasive measurement of a patient's peripheral arterial oxygen saturation has become an accepted standard of care endorsed by anaesthesiologists and their regulatory bodies throughout the world. Pulse oximeters are an integral item on the World Health Organisation's Surgical Safety Checklist which is performed prior to the commencement of every surgical procedure. They are also utilised by other medical professionals and patients in various scenarios. When compared to conventional bedside pulse oximeters, portable fingertip devices have the advantages of cost-effectiveness, high portability, ease of use and battery operation. A review of recent literature reveals a paucity of accuracy studies in adult patients with various comorbidities in the clinical setting. Most data has been obtained under ideal laboratory conditions utilizing healthy adult volunteers. This study aims to pragmatically investigate the performance of a portable fingertip pulse oximeter in adult patients in a hospital setting.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The purpose of this prospective, quantitative study is to compare the agreement between the measured arterial oxygen saturation levels using a portable fingertip versus a conventional bedside pulse oximeter in adult surgical patients, presenting for elective and emergency surgery to Groote Schuur Hospital over a four-week period. Adult surgical patients, not meeting any exclusion criteria, who present for elective or emergency surgery will be recruited. 200 data pairs (SpO2, heart rate and skin tone) will be recorded in the perioperative period (operating rooms, recovery room and intensive care unit).

Existing monitoring devices will not be disturbed. The agreement between the two devices will be compared using a Bland-Altman plot, Microsoft Excel and SPSS software. A root mean square difference value will also be calculated from these values.

No sensitive or personal patient information will be recorded, and pulse oximetry is essential harmless. Potential cross-infection will be avoided by excluding patients with known communicable diseases or open wounds/ bodily fluids in the area to have the oximeter probes applied. The study devices will be disinfected after each use. Recruitment will not affect clinical care.

The significance of this study into the performance of portable fingertip pulse oximeters in adult surgical patients will result in the availability of cheaper devices, deemed as vital anaesthetic equipment by the WHO and various anaesthetic regulatory bodies, in lower income medical facilities. It will also give anaesthetists and other medical personal the confidence to make clinical decisions based on these highly portable devices, thereby making pulse oximeters more available in resource limited areas. It will also add further data to existing studies and help assess whether darker skin pigment affects the performance of these devices in the clinical setting, which is highly relevant in an African country like South Africa.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anesthesia Hypoxemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

All patients

All patients enrolled in trial will have peripheral oxygen saturation simultaneously recorded with both study devices on non-adjacent (second and fourth) fingers of the same hand.

All patients

Intervention Type DEVICE

Peripheral arterial oxygen saturation recording with both study devices

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

All patients

Peripheral arterial oxygen saturation recording with both study devices

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Nihon-Kohden Lifescope BSM 3562 patient monitor Contec CMS50D fingertip pulse oximeter

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult surgical patients presenting for elective or emergency surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* Contact precautions due to high risk of transmissable infectious disease
* Significant hypotension or hypoperfusion (systolic blood pressure \<80 mmHg, or hypothermia)
* Motion artefacts due to excessive patient movements
* Known presence of variant haemoglobin species (eg. carboxy- or methaemoglobin)
* Intraoperative dye use (eg. methylene blue or indocyanine green)
* Nail polish or black henna
* Tape or bandages over the fingers
* Absent/inadequate pulse oximetry tracing on existing monitor
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Cape Town

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ross Hofmeyr

Associate Professor, Dept Anaesthesia & Perioperative Medicine

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ross Hofmeyr, FCA(SA)

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Cape Town

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Groote Schuur Hospital

Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Africa

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UCT_Anaes_201801

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Microaspiration and Endotracheal Tubes
NCT07017205 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA