Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
150 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-10-01
2025-02-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of Cerebral Oxygenation on Postoperative Recovery in Intracranial Surgery
NCT03714347
Evaluation of Oxygen Reserve Index According to Glasgow Coma Scale in Providing Oxygenation in Intracranial Surgery
NCT05953493
Is Effective Preoxygenation in Elderly Patients Related to Position?
NCT05659758
Evaluation of Cerebral Oxygenation During Orthopedic Surgeries Performed in the Beach Chair Position Under General Anesthesia
NCT07270341
The Effect of Two Different Artificial Respiration Methods on the Intraocular Pressure During Surgery Under General Anesthesia
NCT01567761
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
While deciding on the positions applied in intracranial surgery, it may be necessary to apply modifications by keeping the surgical application site in the foreground. The preferred patient position in the operation can help prevent complications and serious side effects. Although each position applied in intracranial operations has advantages and disadvantages, the surgeon should choose the most suitable position for the patient and pathology. The "park bench" position is widely used in posterior fossa operations and has replaced the sitting position for most neurosurgical procedures . However, since the advantages of the sitting position could not be obtained, this position was also changed and the modified Park bench position with 30 degrees upside tilt was used. This position can provide similar advantages with the sitting position and also reduces the risk of venous air embolism and hypotension . The modified sitting position for posterior fossa surgery versus the semi-sitting or "beach chair" position retains many of the advantages and provides a rapid trendelenburg in case of air embolism. The classical sitting position causes postural hypotension in approximately 1/3 of the patients and severe hypotension is seen in 2-5% of the patients. Excellent surgical intervention, drier area and less blood loss, reduced facial swelling are the advantages of the sitting position. However, the risk of venous air embolism and increased pneumocephalus should not be ignored.
In addition to the hemodynamic changes due to all these known positions, there is no follow-up of cerebral regional oxygen saturation (rSo2) monitoring depending on the position, which we could not detect in the literature. This monitoring can contribute to the optimal continuation of cerebral blood flow while deciding on the appropriate position of the patients. In this case, the postoperative mortality and morbidity of the patients can be reduced. In addition, intraoperative cerebral oxygenation monitoring is critical for predicting delirium in the postoperative period.
Our aim in this study is to investigate the effects of the positions applied in Intracranial Surgery on Cerebral Oxygenation and to evaluate the superiority of the patient positions used to each other.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group P
Patients operated in the prone position
No interventions assigned to this group
Group S
Patients operated in the supine position
No interventions assigned to this group
Group L
Patients operated in the lateral position
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients aged 25-75 years
* Patients in the ASA I-II-III risk group
Exclusion Criteria
* patients with heart failure, renal failure, liver failure
* patients with congenital neurological deficits
* patients who cannot be contacted
25 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Trakya University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ars Gor Dr Oguzhan Gulgen
Research assistant doctor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Trakya university
Edirne, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Trakya U/Anesthesiology
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.