Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
174 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-02-23
2025-03-24
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Laparoscopic IPOM Plus vs. eTEP Trial
NCT05528107
Does the Mesh Have to be Fixed in Laparoscopic eTEP Repair of Inguinal Hernia?
NCT06070142
Short Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh With Facial Repair(IPOM-plus) for Ventral Hernia.
NCT04137172
sIPOM vs pIPOM in Incisional Hernia Patients
NCT05712213
Comparing eTEP and Laparoscopic Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM) for Ventral Hernias
NCT04150796
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This prospective comparative study is designed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of eTEP-RS versus IPOM Plus in patients undergoing elective repair of ventral or incisional hernias. The study will assess intra-operative parameters (e.g., duration of surgery, blood loss), early post-operative outcomes (pain score, duration of hospital stay), surgical site complications (seroma, infection, mesh-related issues), and long-term outcomes (recurrence, quality of life).
Patients fulfilling inclusion criteria will be assigned to one of the two arms. Standardized protocols will be followed for pre-operative work-up, anesthesia, surgical steps, and post-operative care. Data will be analyzed to determine if one technique offers superior clinical outcomes, better patient satisfaction, or reduced recurrence
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
eTEP-RS Technique
Patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal wall hernia repair using the eTEP-RS (Enhanced View Totally Extraperitoneal-Retromuscular) technique.
eTEP-RS Hernia Repair
Laparoscopic retromuscular mesh repair using the enhanced view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP-RS) technique for ventral or incisional hernia.
IPOM Plus Technique
Patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal wall hernia repair using the IPOM Plus technique with fascial defect closure.
IPOM Plus Hernia Repair
Intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM Plus) repair involving laparoscopic fascial defect closure and mesh placement for abdominal wall hernias.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
eTEP-RS Hernia Repair
Laparoscopic retromuscular mesh repair using the enhanced view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP-RS) technique for ventral or incisional hernia.
IPOM Plus Hernia Repair
Intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM Plus) repair involving laparoscopic fascial defect closure and mesh placement for abdominal wall hernias.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age between 18 years and 60 years.
* elective surgical cases(non emergency)
Exclusion Criteria
* patient not giving consent.
* patient with lateral HERNIAS.
* patient with complicated ventral HERNIAS like irreducible , obstructed and strangulated HERNIAS.
* pregnant and lactating women.
* patient on anticoagulants.
* recurrent hernia.
* patient not fit for GA.
* POOR GENERAL CONDITION.
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
GSVM Medical College
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Kavita Sijwali
Junior resident, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SURGERY
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kavita Sijwali, MBBS, MS SURGERY RESIDENT
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
GSVM MEDICAL COLLEGE KANPUR
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Gsvm Medical College Kanpur
Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ETEPIPOM2024
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.