Comparison of Mesh Fixation and Non-Fixation in eTEP

NCT ID: NCT06417359

Last Updated: 2024-05-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-10-04

Study Completion Date

2024-10-04

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Inguinal hernia surgery is one of the most frequently performed procedures among general surgery cases. As with many open surgical methods, this repair is also performed laparoscopically. Among these closed methods, the one method is laparoscopic extended total extraperitoneal repair (eTEP). The benefits of laparoscope include less postoperative pain and complications, faster recovery, reduced chronic pain, and recurrence rate.

One of the recent debates regarding the laparoscopic technique is mesh fixation. Fixation of the mesh to the cooper ligament can prevent mesh migration and consequently reduce the recurrence rate. However, it has been reported that this fixation may increase postoperative pain. Several studies have reported that recurrence may be due to inadequate mesh fixation technique. In contrast, other prospective randomized studies have found relapse unrelated to mesh fixation.

In the eTEP technique, dissection is performed in a larger area than in TEP. For this reason, it can be thought that the possibility of mesh displacement is higher in the eTEP procedure. The purpose of this study is to confirm this idea with a prospective study. There are studies in the literature on mesh fixation related to the total extraperitoneal repair (TEP) technique. However, there is no study on mesh detection in the eTEP technique. The aim of the study is to compare patients who underwent withmesh fixation and without mesh fixation laparoscopic eTEP repair in terms of clinical data such as mesh displacement and hernia recurrence, chronic pain, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Migration of Implant Pain Postoperative Complications Relapse

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

eTEP Mesh Fixation Group

In 30 patients; Inguinal hernia surgery will be performed with the eTEP method and the 15x12x10 cm polyprolene patch used in this surgery will be marked with small metallic clips from the lateral, superomedial and inferomedial sides. During the surgery, the mesh will be fixed to three absorbable tacker the Cooper ligament, süpermedially and laterally. Patients whose pain scores (VAS score) are measured on the first postoperative day and who are suitable for discharge will be discharged after a pelvis x-ray is taken. One month after the surgery and 6 months later, patients will be called to the outpatient clinic and examined, their pain scores will be measured (VAS score) and pelvic radiographs will be taken. The movement of the clips marked on the patch will be compared with previous radiographs in cm.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Mesh Fixation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

That mesh will be fixation with three tackers.

eTEP No Mesh Fixation Group

In 30 patients; Inguinal hernia surgery will be performed with the eTEP method and the 15x12x10 cm polyprolene patch used in this surgery will be marked with small metallic clips from the lateral, superomedial and inferomedial sides. During the surgery, the mesh will not be fixed to the Cooper ligament. Patients whose pain scores (VAS score) are measured on the first postoperative day and who are suitable for discharge will be discharged after a pelvis x-ray is taken. One month after the surgery and 6 months later, patients will be called to the outpatient clinic and examined, their pain scores will be measured (VAS score) and pelvic radiographs will be taken. The movement of the clips marked on the patch will be compared with previous radiographs in cm.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

No Mesh Fixation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

That mesh will not be fixation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Mesh Fixation

That mesh will be fixation with three tackers.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

No Mesh Fixation

That mesh will not be fixation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with unilateral inguinal hernias,
* Patients aged 18-65.

Exclusion Criteria

* Younger than 18 years, and older than 65 years,
* Incarcerated or strangulated inguinal hernias,
* Patients with bilateral inguinal hernias,
* Patients who are contraindicated to receive general anesthesia,
* Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Van Training and Research Hospital

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Mehmet Eşref Ulutaş

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mehmet Eşref Ulutaş

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Health Science Van Training and Research Hospital

Van, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Abdullah Hilmi Yılmaz, MD

Role: CONTACT

0432 222 00 10

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Abdullah Hilmi Yılmaz, MD

Role: primary

0432 222 00 10

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Yildirim MB, Sahiner IT. The effect of mesh fixation on migration and postoperative pain in laparoscopic TEP repair: prospective randomized double-blinded controlled study. Hernia. 2023 Feb;27(1):63-70. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02587-w. Epub 2022 Mar 14.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 35286511 (View on PubMed)

Claus CMP, Rocha GM, Campos ACL, Paulin JAN, Coelho JCU. Mesh Displacement After Bilateral Inguinal Hernia Repair With No Fixation. JSLS. 2017 Jul-Sep;21(3):e2017.00033. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2017.00033.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28904521 (View on PubMed)

Claus CM, Rocha GM, Campos AC, Bonin EA, Dimbarre D, Loureiro MP, Coelho JC. Prospective, randomized and controlled study of mesh displacement after laparoscopic inguinal repair: fixation versus no fixation of mesh. Surg Endosc. 2016 Mar;30(3):1134-40. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4314-7. Epub 2015 Jun 20.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26092029 (View on PubMed)

Yilmaz AH, Ulutas ME. Assessment of mesh displacement following laparoscopic enhanced view totally extraperitoneal technique: comparing mesh fixation and non-fixation in difficult inguinal hernias. Updates Surg. 2025 May 28. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02271-5. Online ahead of print.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40434603 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

65656565

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.