Open Mesh Versus Suture Repair in Treatment of Abdominal Wall Hernias

NCT ID: NCT01018524

Last Updated: 2010-03-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

2 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2002-03-31

Study Completion Date

2009-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to:

1. compare the long term results of mesh versus suture repair in treatment of abdominal wall defects;
2. find the optimal location of implanted prosthesis, comparing the two most useful position of mesh in abdominal wall hernia surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

To determine difference of operation time, applied materials of hernia operations; clinical complications, postoperative pain, hernia recurrence, recovery and normal activity time after surgery.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Abdominal Hernia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

small hernias - suture repair

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

abdominal wall reconstruction

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

suture repair, mesh repair, onlay mesh reconstruction, sublay mesh reconstruction, recurrence rate

small hernias - mesh repair

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

abdominal wall reconstruction

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

suture repair, mesh repair, onlay mesh reconstruction, sublay mesh reconstruction, recurrence rate

large hernias - sublay mesh

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

abdominal wall reconstruction

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

suture repair, mesh repair, onlay mesh reconstruction, sublay mesh reconstruction, recurrence rate

large hernias - onlay mesh

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

abdominal wall reconstruction

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

suture repair, mesh repair, onlay mesh reconstruction, sublay mesh reconstruction, recurrence rate

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

abdominal wall reconstruction

suture repair, mesh repair, onlay mesh reconstruction, sublay mesh reconstruction, recurrence rate

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* During the two-year randomization period at the joined centres all patients were included who were admitted with abdominal wall or umbilical hernia and who suited the requirements.
* All the patients with primer or first recurrence of postoperative abdominal or primer or first recurrence of umbilical hernia were randomized into this study.
* For involvement into the study good patient compliance, signed consent form, normal local circumstances were needed.

Exclusion Criteria

* Ages fewer than 18 or above 70 years
* Hernia orifice under 5 cm2.
* Planned or accidental intraoperative opening of any bowel.
* Unstable parameters of circulation, uncontrollable diabetic or autoimmune disease.
* Severe renal or hepatic failure
* Advanced stage of tumours or currently treated malignancies.
* Inflamed or muddy content of hernia sac.
* If the patient did not signed the consent form.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hungarian Surgical Society

NETWORK

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hungarian Surgical Society

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

György Wéber, Prof. Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hungarian Surgical Society

József Baracs, Dr.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Hungarian Surgical Society

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dept. of Surgery Univ. of Pecs

Pécs, , Hungary

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Hungary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Weber G, Horvath OP. [Results of ventral hernia repair: comparison of suture repair with mesh implantation (onlay vs sublay) using open and laparoscopic approach--prospective, randomized, multicenter study]. Magy Seb. 2002 Oct;55(5):285-9. Hungarian.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12474512 (View on PubMed)

Weber G, Baracs J, Horvath OP. ["Onlay" mesh provides significantly better results than "sublay" reconstruction. Prospective randomized multicenter study of abdominal wall reconstruction with sutures only, or with surgical mesh--results of a five-years follow-up]. Magy Seb. 2010 Oct;63(5):302-11. doi: 10.1556/MaSeb.63.2010.5.3. Hungarian.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 20965863 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HSS-AHS 02-09

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.