Mesh Versus Suture Repair in Umbilical Hernias - A Multicenter Trial

NCT ID: NCT04231071

Last Updated: 2024-02-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

288 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-02-03

Study Completion Date

2024-01-03

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Umbilical hernia repair is one of the most common surgical performance in general surgery. Up to now, the use of suture repair has been the preferred technique for small umbilical hernia defects without any gold standard procedure. Mesh have been reserved to larger umbilical hernia defects. However, there is an increasing evidence that mesh reinforcement could be advantageous to lower the high recurrence rates also in smaller umbilical hernias. A remained important question is in what anatomical position the mesh should be placed. The investigators hypothesize that the use of an onlay mesh in small umbilical hernia defects can reduces recurrence rates without increasing postoperative complications compared to a suture repair.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The trial is a prospective multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing onlay mesh to suture repair. Two hundred and eighty-eight patients with a primary elective umbilical hernia below and equal to 2 cm from seven Swedish participating surgical centers will be enrolled. Randomization will be performed intraoperatively following the measurement of the defect (with stratification for centra and for the defect size) to either closing the small umbilical defect with a simple primary suture repair or closing the defect with a simple primary suture repair with an attached small flat lightweight polypropylene only mesh on the aponeurosis. Trial participants, investigators and follow-up clinical surgeons will be blinded for the assigned allocation. The primary endpoint will be recurrence at 1 and 3 years. Secondary endpoint will be surgical site postoperative complications at 30 days and pain 1 year after surgery. As follows, participants will be visiting the outpatient clinical at 30 d, 1 year and 3 year after surgery.

All analyses will be performed according to the intention to treat principle and as specified in the analyses plan of the study protocol.

There is no randomized clinical trial today comparing recurrence rates between an onlay mesh repair and a suture repair for small umbilical hernia defects. The trial design allows a good detection of differences in recurrence with the large sample size and the adequate follow-up. Surgeons are becoming more aware of the mesh's advantage even for the small defects, but are reluctant to use a mesh due to anatomical positions with a large dissection and an increased risk of complications. A small onlay mesh could be an easy and safe method of choice for small umbilical hernia defects to avoid increased recurrence rates. Guidelines for small umbilical hernia repairs have stressed out the need for reliable data for treatment recommendations. The investigators can expect that the trial will have a direct implication on small umbilical hernia repair standards.

The clinical study protocol has underwent full external peer review as part of the funding process with Research funding from SLL (Stockholms läns landsting) Karolinska Institutet. Approval of the protocol by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority was obtained at December 2018 and January 2020.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Umbilical Hernia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Sutured group

Controlled group: Primary suture repair of the small umbilical hernia defect

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Onlay Mesh group

Intervention Type DEVICE

Primary suture repair with a small only mesh on the closed defect

Onlay Mesh group

Intervention group: Primary suture repair of the small umbilical hernia defects + a small Onlay mesh on the closed defect.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Onlay Mesh group

Intervention Type DEVICE

Primary suture repair with a small only mesh on the closed defect

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Onlay Mesh group

Primary suture repair with a small only mesh on the closed defect

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

• Elective surgery of a primary umbilical hernia with a defect ≤ 2 cm that is measured clinically or with radiology.

Exclusion Criteria

* Incisional hernia: previous surgery in the area of the operation
* Recurrent umbilical hernia
* Epigastric hernia (a defect from 3 cm below the xiphoid till 3 cm above the umbilicus) \[20\]
* Another operative procedure at the same time (i.e. cholecystectomy)
* An umbilical hernia with a defect \> 2 cm measured clinically, with radiology or intra-operatively
* Multiple defects
* Pregnancy
* Infected wounds
* Acute operation (incarcerated hernia)
* BMI\>35
* Ascites
* Immunosuppression
* Anticoagulant treatment (Warfarin, NOAK)
* Connective tissue disease
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Karolinska Institutet

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Maria Melkemichel

Medical Doctor, Resident in General Surgery

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Björn Widhe, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyds Hospital, Karolinska Institutet

Sven Bringman, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyds Hospital, Karolinska Institutet

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Enköping Lasarett

Enköping, , Sweden

Site Status

Frölunda Hospital

Gothenburg, , Sweden

Site Status

Mora Lasarett

Mora, , Sweden

Site Status

Department of Surgery at Södertälje Hospital

Södertälje, , Sweden

Site Status

Danderyds Hospital

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Norrtälje Hospital

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Sophiahemmet/GHP

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Sweden

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bergstrom M, Widhe B, Granasen G, Lof Granstrom A, Ohlsson J, Schult S, Dahlstrand U, Osterberg J, Loogna P, Bringman S, Melkemichel M. Onlay mesh versus suture repair for smaller umbilical hernias in adults-early results from SUMMER trial: randomized clinical trial. BJS Open. 2024 Dec 30;9(1):zrae173. doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae173.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40037347 (View on PubMed)

Melkemichel M, Bringman S, Granasen G, Widhe B. SUMMER Trial: mesh versus suture repair in small umbilical hernias in adults-a study protocol for a prospective randomized double-blind multicenter clinical trial. Trials. 2021 Jun 22;22(1):411. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05366-7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34158088 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SUMMER Trial

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

SUMMER2020

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.