Mesh Versus Suture Repair for Umbilical Hernias

NCT ID: NCT00789230

Last Updated: 2018-02-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

300 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-01-31

Study Completion Date

2015-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of the present study is to investigate whether or not the use of mesh is indicated in the repair of all size umbilical hernias as to reduce the rate of recurrence. This method is regularly used in umbilical hernia reconstruction although most surgeons repair small hernias using suture repair (fascia adaptation). Especially risk factors for hernia recurrence such as hernia size and BMI \> 30 kg/m2 need to be evaluated and correlated to the method of hernia repair.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Purpose The purpose of the present study is to investigate whether or not the use of mesh is indicated in the repair of all size umbilical hernias as to reduce the rate of recurrence. This method is regularly used in umbilical hernia reconstruction although most surgeons repair small hernias using suture repair (fascia adaptation). Especially risk factors for hernia recurrence such as hernia size and BMI \> 30 kg/m2 need to be evaluated and correlated to the method of hernia repair.

Study design Randomised controlled, double blinded, multi-centre trial. 300 consecutive patients with an umbilical hernia will be included in the study. Patients will be randomised in one of two groups of 150 patients each. Group 1 will include patients that will undergo primary (suture) repair; group 2 umbilical hernias will be repaired using a pre-peritoneal, flat polypropylene mesh in a tension free fashion.

Stratification will be utilized for the size of the hernia (1-2 cm or ≥2-4 cm) and the participating centre. Patients will visit the outpatient clinic after 2-3 weeks and after 3, 12 and 24 months.

The cumulative hernia recurrence rate during the 2-years follow-up period will be the primary outcome of the study. Complications, pain and QOL are secondary endpoints.

Statistical analysis All analyses will be performed according to the intention to treat principle and as specified in the protocol.

Financial support None.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Umbilical Hernia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Suture versus mesh repair in umbilical hernia patients
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

primary suture

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

primary suture closure

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

primary suture closure of hernia

mesh enforced closure

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

mesh enforced closure

Intervention Type DEVICE

mesh enforced closure of hernia

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

primary suture closure

primary suture closure of hernia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

mesh enforced closure

mesh enforced closure of hernia

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Primary umbilical hernia
* Signed Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Umbilical hernia ≥ 4 cm diameter
* Recurrence
* Midline laparotomy
* Ascites/Cirrhosis
* ASA score IV or above
* Incarcerated hernia/emergency procedures
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ruth Kaufmann, MD

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ruth Kaufmann, MD

R. Kaufmann

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

J. Jeekel, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Erasmus Medical Center

J.F. Lange, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Erasmus Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Studienzentrum der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Chirurgie

Heidelberg, , Germany

Site Status

University of Witten/Herdecke

Witten, , Germany

Site Status

Multimedica

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Erasmus University Medical Center

Rotterdam, South Holland, Netherlands

Site Status

Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis

Assen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis

Delft, , Netherlands

Site Status

Havenziekenhuis

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Ikazia

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Maasstad Ziekenhuis

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Máxima Medisch Centrum

Veldhoven, , Netherlands

Site Status

Isala

Zwolle, , Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany Italy Netherlands

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kaufmann R, Halm JA, Eker HH, Klitsie PJ, Nieuwenhuizen J, van Geldere D, Simons MP, van der Harst E, van 't Riet M, van der Holt B, Kleinrensink GJ, Jeekel J, Lange JF. Mesh versus suture repair of umbilical hernia in adults: a randomised, double-blind, controlled, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2018 Mar 3;391(10123):860-869. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30298-8. Epub 2018 Feb 17.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29459021 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HUMP

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Mesh Type in Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT03091790 COMPLETED NA