Randomized Control Trial Comparing Transfascial Suture for Mesh Fixation to No Mesh Fixation
NCT ID: NCT03938688
Last Updated: 2023-06-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
325 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-10-21
2022-12-18
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Study to Compare Ventral Incisional Hernia by Laparoscopic vs Open Repair With Mesh
NCT00240188
Transfacial Sutures Versus Stapler for Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT00773851
Mesh Versus Suture Repair for Umbilical Hernias
NCT00789230
Sutured vs Sutureless Mesh Fixation for Onlay Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT06209450
Suture Repair vs Mesh Repair for Incisional Hernia
NCT05599750
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This will be a single blinded, registry based, non-inferiority, randomized control trial comparing transfacial sutures for mesh fixation to no mesh fixation in open retromuscular repairs. This will be a two-arm trial with intervention 1: intervention 2 and control allocation ratio of 1:1. The Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative (AHSQC) will serve as the platform for data collection. The AHSQC is a multicenter, nationwide quality improvement effort with the mission of improving the quality of hernia care. Data points not recorded in the AHSQC will be collected by a trained research coordination or research fellow and uploaded into a Research Electronic Data Capture (RedCAP®) database hosted at the Cleveland Clinic
Study population will include all adult patients (≥ 18 years) undergoing elective open ventral hernia repair, where the midline fascia can be approximated and mesh will be placed in the retromuscular position. Only a midline approach to hernia repair and hernia widths equal to or less than 20cm measured intraoperatively will be included. Exclusion criteria include patients unable to give consent, vulnerable populations, parastomal hernias, hernia width measuring more than 20cm intraoperatively, patients planned for minimally invasive approaches or open repairs with mesh placed in a position other than retromuscular, or those who were not able to undergo successful retromuscular mesh placement. Finally, open repairs performed through a different incision than the standard midline approach will also be considered exclusion criteria, as well as the inability to close the midline fascia.
Study Interventions:
* Intervention 1 (Control): Mesh will be placed in the retromuscular space, with wide overlap on all sides. Full thickness transfascial sutures will be placed circumferentially to secure the mesh using slowly absorbable no. 1 sutures. A total of six transfascial sutures will be placed universally for all patients with additional sutures allowed according to each surgeon's discretion. Additional bone or ligament sutures for mesh fixation will be allowed according to each surgeon's discretion.
* Intervention 2: Mesh will be placed in the retromuscular space, with wide overlap on all sides. No fixation method will be used. Bone or ligament sutures for mesh fixation will not be allowed.
Specific Aims:
* Aim 1: To investigate the non-inferiority of recurrence rates in patients receiving no fixation for a mesh placed in retromuscular position compared to those receiving circumferential transfascial suture fixation. Either physical examination, CT scan, or the Ventral Hernia Recurrence Inventory (VHRI) will be used to measure recurrence at one-year follow up.
* Aim 2: To determine if no mesh fixation results in less pain in the immediate postoperative period, measured by the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS-11).
* Aim 3: To determine if no mesh fixation results in less pain on 30 day follow up, measured by using the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity 3a survey
* Aim 4: To determine if in-hospital intravenous and oral opioid consumption will differ between those who received transfascial sutures and those who did not receive any fixation.
* Aim 5: To determine if length of stay will differ between those who received transfascial sutures and those who did not receive any fixation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Transfascial sutures for mesh fixation
Mesh will be placed in the retromuscular space, with wide overlap on all sides. Full thickness transfascial sutures will be placed circumferentially to secure the mesh using slowly absorbable no. 1 sutures. A total of at least six transfascial sutures will be placed universally for all patients with additional sutures allowed according to each surgeon's discretion. Additional bone or ligament sutures for mesh fixation will be allowed according to each surgeon's discretion.
Mesh placement with Transfascial Sutures
Sutures that pass through the full thickness of the abdominal wall, which are used routinely for mesh fixation
No mesh fixation
Mesh will be placed in the retromuscular space, with wide overlap on all sides. No fixation method will be used. Bone or ligament sutures for mesh fixation will not be allowed.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Mesh placement with Transfascial Sutures
Sutures that pass through the full thickness of the abdominal wall, which are used routinely for mesh fixation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* A midline approach to hernia repair
* Hernia widths equal to or less than 20cm measured intraoperatively
Exclusion Criteria
* Parastomal hernias
* Hernia width measuring more than 20cm intraoperatively
* Patients planned for minimally invasive approaches or open repairs with mesh placed in a position other than retromuscular, or those who were not able to undergo successful retromuscular mesh placement.
* Open repairs performed through a different incision than the standard midline approach
* Inability to close the midline fascia.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Cleveland Clinic
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ajita Prabhu, MD
Assistant Professor of Surgery
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ajita S Prabhu
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Cleveland Clinic
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cleveland Clinic Center for Abdominal Core Health
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ellis RC, Petro CC, Krpata DM, Beffa LRA, Miller BT, Montelione KC, Maskal SM, Tu C, Huang LC, Lau B, Fafaj A, Rosenblatt S, Rosen MJ, Prabhu AS. Transfascial Fixation vs No Fixation for Open Retromuscular Ventral Hernia Repairs: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. 2023 Aug 1;158(8):789-795. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.1786.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
19-333
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.