Laparoscopic Versus Open Incisional Hernia Repair

NCT ID: NCT01420757

Last Updated: 2011-08-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

206 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

1999-05-31

Study Completion Date

2011-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Primary closure of incisional hernia without the use of a mesh shows recurrence rates of up to 54%. If a mesh is used, the defect can be closed tension-free. Using this method, recurrence rates have been reduced to 8-21%. Laparoscopic correction of incisional hernia is a relatively new technique in which the mesh is positioned intraperitoneally. Research has shown that this procedure is technical feasible and may have benefits for the patients.

The ongoing debate about the merits of endoscopic versus open incisional hernia repair prompts the need for a level 1 randomized controlled trial.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Postoperative Pain Complications Recurrence

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

open

open incisional hernia repair

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

incisional hernia repair

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Tension-free open or laparoscopic incisional hernia repair

laparoscopic

laparoscopic incisional hernia repair

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

incisional hernia repair

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Tension-free open or laparoscopic incisional hernia repair

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

incisional hernia repair

Tension-free open or laparoscopic incisional hernia repair

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* hernia diameter between 3 and 15 cm
* location at the ventral abdominal wall at least 5cm from costae and inguinal area
* indication for elective repair
* age of 18 years or older
* written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* contraindication for pneumoperitoneum
* an absolute contraindication for general anesthesia
* history of open abdomen treatment
* patients participating in other trials
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Erasmus Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

hasan eker

Prof. Dr. J.F. Lange

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

J.F. Lange, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Erasmus Medical Center

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

COLIBRI trial

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.