The Effect of Laparoscopically Closing the Hernia Defect in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair on Postoperative Pain
NCT ID: NCT01962480
Last Updated: 2019-02-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-11-30
2019-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The primary purpose is to compare early postoperative activity-related pain in patients undergoing ventral hernia repair with closure of the gap with patients undergoing standard laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (non-closure of the gap). Secondary outcomes are cosmesis and hernia-related quality of life (QoL) at 30-days and clinical or radiological recurrence and chronic pain after 2 years.
Material and Methods: A randomized, controlled, double-blinded study is planned. Based on power calculation we will include 40 patients in each arm. Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic umbilical, epigastric, or umbilical trocar-site hernia repair at Hvidovre Hospital, Herlev Hospital, or Køge Hospital, who meet the inclusion criteria, are invited to participate.
Conclusion: The technique with closure of the gap may induce more postoperative pain, but may be superior with regard to other important surgical outcomes. No studies have previously investigated closure of the gap in the setting of a randomised controlled trial.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Giant Ventral Incisional Hernia: Abdominal Wall Function, Respiratory Performance and Quality of Life
NCT02011048
The Influence of Closing the Gap on Postoperative Seroma and Recurrences in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT01719718
3D HD Versus 2D HD in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT02396940
Laparotomy Closure Techniques: do Surgeons Follow the Latest Guidelines? Results of a Questionnaire.
NCT04013009
Comparison of Hybrid and Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair
NCT02542085
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
sutured closure of the hernia gap
The hernia gap is sutured intracorporally
The hernia gap is sutured intracorporally
The hernia gab is closed with non-absorbable suture (Ethibond Excel 2-0, Ethicon, Johnson \& Johnson©) performed by an intracorporally interrupted sutured technique using an Auto Suture© Endo-Slide knot-tying instrument. The stitches are placed with a distance of 0.5 - 1 cm from the fascial edges and with a distance of 0.5-1 cm. between the stitches, performed under a 6-8 mmHg intrabdominal pressure.
No closure of the hernia gap
Physiomesh is placed with at least 5 cm overlap of the gap and fixated with double crown technique
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
The hernia gap is sutured intracorporally
The hernia gab is closed with non-absorbable suture (Ethibond Excel 2-0, Ethicon, Johnson \& Johnson©) performed by an intracorporally interrupted sutured technique using an Auto Suture© Endo-Slide knot-tying instrument. The stitches are placed with a distance of 0.5 - 1 cm from the fascial edges and with a distance of 0.5-1 cm. between the stitches, performed under a 6-8 mmHg intrabdominal pressure.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Hernia defect between 2-6 cm measured preoperatively by the surgeon at the out-patient clinic
* Maximum 1 defect
* Patients 18-80 years Patients with technical failure (where it is not possible to suture the defect) or patients who are reoperated due to complications remain included and will stay in their primary assigned randomization group in order to perform an intention to treat (ITT) analysis.
Exclusion Criteria
* Poor compliance (language problems, dementia and alcohol or drug abuse etc.)
* Fascia defect \>6 cm (largest diameter, evaluated preoperatively and intra-operatively, thus patients are excluded if the defect is found larger intra-operatively)
* Emergency repair
* Chronic pain syndrome (chronic back pain, chronic headache, severe dysmenorrhea, fibromyalgia, whiplash or other conditions requiring daily opioid medication)
* Daily consumption of opioids (for the last 3 weeks up till the operation)
* Decompensated liver cirrhosis (Child-Pugh B-C)
* If the hernia repair is secondarily to another surgical procedure
* If a patient withdraws his/her inclusion consent
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Copenhagen
OTHER
Hvidovre University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mette Willaume Christoffersen
M.D, PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mette Christoffersen, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Individual Purchaser
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hvidovre University Hospital
Hvidovre, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sauerland S, Walgenbach M, Habermalz B, Seiler CM, Miserez M. Laparoscopic versus open surgical techniques for ventral or incisional hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Mar 16;(3):CD007781. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007781.pub2.
Christoffersen MW, Westen M, Rosenberg J, Helgstrand F, Bisgaard T. Closure of the fascial defect during laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg. 2020 Feb;107(3):200-208. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11490.
Christoffersen MW, Westen M, Assadzadeh S, Deigaard SL, Rosenberg J, Bisgaard T. The clinical effects of closure of the hernia gap after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Dan Med J. 2014 Jun;61(6):A4865.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CLOSE-GAP-1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.