Study of a New Laparoscopic Technique for Parastomal Hernia Repair With Mesh
NCT ID: NCT00138957
Last Updated: 2008-07-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-09-30
2007-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prospective Study of the Use of a Mesh to Prevent Parastomal Hernia After Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Resection
NCT01722565
Effectiveness of a Lightweight Mesh in the Laparoscopic Prevention of Parastomal Hernia
NCT00908661
Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Surgical Repair of Inguinal Hernia Using Sutured Repair Versus Tacker Use
NCT05574751
Chronic Pain After Inguinal Hernia Repair, the ONSTEP Technique Versus the Laparoscopic Approach
NCT01960777
Prospective Study Of A Size Tailored Approach To Repair Umbilical And Epigastric Primary Ventral Hernias
NCT01639118
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The surgical treatment of parastomal hernias is controversial. The best way to treat it is to restore the continuity of the intestine, but in permanent stomas, this is not an option. Many surgical techniques have been described when intervention is required, but the results are unacceptable. The traditional open techniques are local simple suturing of the fascia defect, stoma relocation, or repair with a prosthetic material either intraperitoneally or extraperitoneally (subfascial or onlay). Overall, the results of all methods are poor with high recurrence rates and high morbidity and mortality. Mesh repair has the lowest recurrence rate (0-39%) and stoma relocation and simple suture has reported recurrence rates on 0-76% and 46-100%, respectively. Laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernias with a prosthetic mesh inserted intraperitoneally is a new method described in a few small series. The results so far are encouraging, but the follow-up period is short.
Looking at the disappointing results from the traditional open techniques in the treatment of parastomal hernias together with the enormous success in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair and laparoscopy overall, we believe that laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair with mesh will be an effective treatment option in the future. Therefore, we find it interesting to investigate the technique in a prospective study
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair with mesh
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Indication for laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair in general anaesthesia.
* Danish speaking
* ASA group I-III
* No remaining malignancy after former primary radical operation for colorectal cancer
Exclusion Criteria
* Incarcerated hernia (acute operation)
* History of abuse or permanent morphine use
* Expected bad compliance
* Current systemic steroid use or other immuno-suppressive treatment
* HIV-positive, pregnant or breast feeding
* Medical conditions contraindicating general anaesthesia
* Simultaneous operation for other ventral, inguinal or umbilical hernia
* Epidural or spinal anaesthesia
* Conversion to open procedure
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ethicon, Inc.
INDUSTRY
University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen
OTHER
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jacob Rosenberg, Prof, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Gentofte University Hospital, Dept. of Surgery
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
KA05102m
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.