Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair With Fibrin Glue Versus Tack Mesh Fixation

NCT ID: NCT06679504

Last Updated: 2024-11-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-07-01

Study Completion Date

2024-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The quality of life after hernia surgery like chronic pain and discomfort has frequently been reported with a frequency varying from 0 to 53%. As many as 10% of the patients report increased pain following surgery. Therefore, the current study aimed to assess the quality-of-life for patients with post-inguinal hernia repair by mesh fixation versus fibrin glue.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A wide variety of mesh fixation techniques are available for laparoscopic hernia repair. These can be broadly divided into mechanical and nonmechanical methods. Mechanical methods include sutures and tissue penetrating fixation devices like tackers. Nonmechanical techniques include self-gripping meshes and tissue adhesives (glues).

Mechanical methods are hypothesized to cause more postoperative pain and increased risk of seroma formation, hematoma formation, and osteitis pubis due to tissue trauma and also have increased risk of chronic pain due to nerve entrapment. On the other hand, nonmechanical methods do not have these disadvantages.

Furthermore, the quality of life after hernia surgery like chronic pain and discomfort has frequently been reported with a frequency varying from 0 to 53%. As many as 10% of the patients report increased pain following surgery. Such a chronic pain is often developed due to the use of open inguinal technique along with heavy weight mesh with mechanical fixation techniques, presence of severe pain before surgery and young age. To the best of our knowledge, there are lacking evidence assessing the impact of mesh fixation using fibrin glue upon the quality of life of patients. Therefore, the current study aimed to assess the quality-of-life for patients who had post inguinal hernia repair by mesh fixation versus fibrin glue.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Inguinal Hernia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Fibrin glue group

Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair With Fibrin Glue

Fibrin glue fixation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair With Fibrin Glue fixation

Tack fixation group

Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair With Fibrin Glue Versus Tack Mesh Fixation

Tack fixation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair With Tack Mesh Fixation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Fibrin glue fixation

Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair With Fibrin Glue fixation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Tack fixation

Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair With Tack Mesh Fixation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age group of 18-60 years.
2. All types of inguinal hernias.
3. Didn't undergo pervious hernia repair surgery.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients who are unfit for general anesthesia or with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade 3 and above.
2. Presence of other groin or abdominal hernias.
3. Patients with complicated hernias such as irreducibility, obstruction, and incarceration.
4. Patients with obesity or morbid obesity BMI \>= 35.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Suez Canal University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Waleed Ghareeb

Consultant and lecturer of Surgery

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sameh Tolba, PhD, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Suez canal University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Suez Canal University

Ismailia, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

#4846/2022

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair TEP vs TAPP
NCT07108972 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA