Needlescopic Versus Traditional Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair in Pediatrics

NCT ID: NCT06660550

Last Updated: 2024-11-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-11-01

Study Completion Date

2025-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the study is to evaluate the results of Needlescopic inguinal hernia repair in comparison with traditional laparoscopic repair in children as regard operative time, cosmetic appearance, recurrence and other complications.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients and methods:

* Place of the study: The study will be held in Department of Pediatric surgery in Sohag University Hospital.
* Type of the study: Prospective comparative Cohort study.
* Duration of the study: The study will last for 6 to 9 months starting from the date of acceptance of the protocol.
* Ethical considerations: The study will be carried out after approval by scientific and ethical committees of Sohag faculty of medicine.
* Method of the study:

Preoperative assessment:

1. Demographic data: e.g. name, age, sex …. etc.
2. History: e.g. complaint, present history and past surgical and medical history…etc.
3. General and local examination: e.g. laterality, associated anomalies …. etc.
4. Investigations:

Routine labs. Imaging: to confirm diagnosis in the affected side, to evaluate contralateral side, bilateral testicular volume as volumetric stander to evaluate testicular atrophy postoperative and other anomalies.

Operative technique:

Operative steps:

A. Traditional laparoscopic repair.

* STEPS:

1. A 5mm port for the camera is introduced at umbilicus by open technique.
2. Using triangulation rule to introduce two working ports.
3. The abdomen is insufflated with carbon dioxide to 6-8 mmHg pressure in patients under 1 year of age and to 8-10 mmHg in older children.
4. Diathermize the neck of the hernia sac with a diathermy hook.
5. A 10-15 cm absorbable suture is passed into the peritoneal cavity through the abdominal wall next to the lateral port under vision.
6. The purse-string stitch commences at the 2 o'clock position of the internal hernia opening.
7. ensure that a "complete ring" of peritoneum has been included in the purse-string stitch without significant gaps.
8. The purse-string suture is tied tightly using intracorporeally knot tying.

B. Needlescopic Internal Ring Suturing.
* EQUIPMENT/SUTURE:

1. One 5-mm trocar and 5-mm lens 30° or 0° telescope.
2. Epidural needle.
3. Non absorbable suture.
4. Fascial closure instrument.
* STEPS:

1. A 5mm port for the camera is introduced at umbilicus by open technique.
2. The abdomen is insufflated with carbon dioxide to 6-8 mmHg pressure in patients under 1 year of age and to 8-10 mmHg in older children.
3. The suture is introduced through the barrel of the epidural needle.
4. Maintaining both ends of the preloaded suture extra peritoneal, the needle is advanced under the peritoneum around lateral half of the internal ring.
5. The peritoneum is entered and the suture advanced into the abdominal cavity, creating a loop.
6. Fascial closure instrument is introduced directly through anterior abdominal wall to help to maintain suture loop.
7. The needle is removed, leaving the loop in place.
8. The needle is entered again through the same skin puncture site around the medial half of the ring and enter the peritoneum, leaving a small space above the vas deferens and testicular vessels to avoid injury.
9. The loop of suture is introduced into the hollow of the needle again and advance the suture into the first loop by the help of fascial closure.
10. Withdraw the needle.
11. Catch the suture end in the loop and withdraw them together then the suture is tied extra corporeally.

Patient outcomes:

Patients assessment and follow up:

1. Primary outcome measures:

Operative time. Intraoperative complication. Rate of conversion to open surgery.
2. Secondary outcome measures:

1 and 3 months after the surgery to asses:

1. Cosmetic appearance: according to (The Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating "SCAR" Scale) \[7\].
2. Recurrence.
3. Hydrocele.
4. Testicular atrophy (postoperative imaging: \> 50% loss of testicular volume or \< 25% of volume of contralateral testis) \[8\].

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Congenital Inguinal Hernia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

evaluate the results of Needlescopic inguinal hernia repair in comparison with traditional laparoscopic repair in children as regard operative time, cosmetic appearance, recurrence and other complications
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Needlescopic inguinal hernia repair

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Needlescopic inguinal hernia repair

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Needlescopic inguinal hernia repair

Traditional laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

traditional laparoscopic repair

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

traditional laparoscopic repair

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Needlescopic inguinal hernia repair

Needlescopic inguinal hernia repair

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Include patients presented with inguinal hernia with age \< 18 years.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Age above 18 years.
2. Complicated inguinal hernia (e.g. irreducibility, obstruction and strangulation).
3. Pervious lower abdominal surgeries.
Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sohag University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Abdelaziz Ali Abdelaziz

M.B.B.Ch., Resident in Pediatric Surgery Department Sohag University Hospitals

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sohag University Hospitals

Sohag, , Egypt

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Abdelaziz A Abdelaziz, Resident

Role: CONTACT

00201010274505

Ahmed M Abd El-Moniem, Professor

Role: CONTACT

00201005768450

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Abdelaziz A Abdelaziz, Resident

Role: primary

00201010274505

Ahmed M Abd El-Moniem, Professor

Role: backup

00201005768450

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

1. Cóbar, J. P., & Nichol, P. F. (2023). Introduction of pediatric laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in Guatemala. BMC Surgery, 23(1). 2. Chang, S., Chen, J. Y., Hsu, C., Chuang, F., & Yang, S. S. D. (2015). The incidence of inguinal hernia and associated risk factors of incarceration in pediatric inguinal hernia: a nation-wide longitudinal population-based study. Hernia, 20(4), 559-563. 3. Elhosary, M. A., Elbatarny, A. M., Arafa, M., Mahmoud, S. M., Ismail, K. A., et al. (2023). Needlescopic primary paediatric inguinal hernia repair by hernia sac disconnection and peritoneal closure. Journal of Pakistan Medical Association, 73(4), S61-S66. 4. Maat, S. C., Dreuning, K. M. A., Nordkamp, S., Van Gemert, W., Twisk, J. W. R., et al. (2021). Comparison of intra- and extra-corporeal laparoscopic hernia repair in children: A systematic review and pooled data-analysis. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 56(9), 1647-1656. 5. Hajong, R., Newme, K., & Moirangthem, T. (2022). A case control study of needlescopic herniotomy versus open herniotomy in children. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 11(7), 3633. 6. Shalaby, R., Negm, M., Elsawaf, M., Elsaied, A., Shehata, S., et al. (2021). Needlescopic disconnection and peritoneal closure for Pediatric inguinal hernia repair: a Novel technique. Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, 32(2), 272-278. 7. Kantor J, et al. Reliability and photographic equivalency of the SCAR Cosmesis assessment and rating (SCAR) scale, an outcome measure for postoperative scars. JAMA Dermatol. 2017;153(1):55-60 8. Ein, S.H. ∙ Nasr, A. ∙ Wales, P.W. ... Testicular atrophy after attempted pediatric orchidopexy for true undescended testis J Pediatr Surg. 2014; 49:317-322.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Soh-Med-15-10-4MS

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id