Laparoscopic Versus Open Mesh Repair of Bilateral Primary Inguinal Hernia

NCT ID: NCT04437784

Last Updated: 2020-06-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

180 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-06-30

Study Completion Date

2020-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The best approach for simultaneous repair of bilateral inguinal hernia is controversial. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes after laparoscopic versus open mesh repair of bilateral primary inguinal hernia

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This prospective study included 180 patients with bilateral primary inguinal hernia; randomized by sealed envelopes into 3 groups; each includes 60 patients. Group I treated by laparoscopic trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) repair using 2 separate meshes, Group II treated by open pre-peritoneal (PP) single mesh repair, while Group III treated by bilateral Lichtenstein repair. The 3 groups were compared regarding: operative time, postoperative complications, postoperative pain, 3 years-recurrence rate and patient's satisfaction.

.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bilateral Inguinal Hernia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators
Sealed opaque envelopes containing computer generated random numbers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Laparoscopic Trans-Abdominal Pre-Peritoneal (Lap TAPP group))

Both hernias were treated by laparoscopic trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal repair using 2 separate meshes fixed by endoscopic tackers

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Laparoscopic Trans-Abdominal Pre-Peritoneal

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal repair using 2 separate meshes fixed by endoscopic tackers

Open Pre-Peritoneal Repair ( Open PP group)

Both hernias were treated by open pre-peritoneal single mesh repair with suture fixation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Open pre-peritoneal repair

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Open pre-peritoneal single mesh repair with suture fixation

Bilateral Lichtenstein repair (LICHT group)

treated by bilateral standard Lichtenstein repair using 2 separate meshes with suture fixation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Bilateral Lichtenstein repair

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Bilateral standard Lichtenstein repair using 2 separate meshes with suture fixation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Laparoscopic Trans-Abdominal Pre-Peritoneal

Laparoscopic trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal repair using 2 separate meshes fixed by endoscopic tackers

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Open pre-peritoneal repair

Open pre-peritoneal single mesh repair with suture fixation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Bilateral Lichtenstein repair

Bilateral standard Lichtenstein repair using 2 separate meshes with suture fixation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with painless uncomplicated primary bilateral inguinal hernias

Exclusion Criteria

* Immune compromised patients
* Coagulopathy
* Chronic liver or renal disease
* High-risk patients unfit for major surgery (ASA III or IV),
* Massive scrotal hernias, Recurrent or Complicated hernias
* Groin pain due to any other pathology
* Previous infra-umbilical surgery
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Alexandria University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mohamed El Messiry

Assistant professor of Surgery

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mohamed Elmessiry, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Assistant Professor of Surgery

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sarli L, Iusco DR, Sansebastiano G, Costi R. Simultaneous repair of bilateral inguinal hernias: a prospective, randomized study of open, tension-free versus laparoscopic approach. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2001 Aug;11(4):262-7. doi: 10.1097/00129689-200108000-00007.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11525372 (View on PubMed)

Feliu X, Claveria R, Besora P, Camps J, Fernandez-Sallent E, Vinas X, Abad JM. Bilateral inguinal hernia repair: laparoscopic or open approach? Hernia. 2011 Feb;15(1):15-8. doi: 10.1007/s10029-010-0736-2. Epub 2010 Oct 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20960019 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

302765

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.