Factors Associated With Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing TAPP Hernia Repair for Inguinal Hernia
NCT ID: NCT05522608
Last Updated: 2025-06-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
64 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-05-01
2024-07-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
M-Tapa vs OSTAP for Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair Surgery
NCT05476510
Chronic Pain After Groin Hernia Repair
NCT02751190
Inversion and Fixation of the Transversalis Fascia in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT05420818
Nationwide Results on Chronic Pain After Bilateral Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair (TAPP)
NCT03155230
Chronic Pain After Inguinal Herniorrhaphy
NCT00226161
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
patients with postoperative pain
Patients with postoperative pain after transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair
transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair
It is made through 3 holes, 10 mm optical port from the umbilicus, and 5 mm ports each from the right and left lower quadrants. The peritoneum is opened a few cm above the defect in the form of an arc. Dissection of the peritoneum, first lateral and then medial to the defect, is performed. It is continued until the pubic bone is found medially and the periphery of the bone is released. The dissection of the cord elements and the sac is completed. Posterior dissection is a very important step to avoid recurrence. Here, the peritoneum is thoroughly dissected posteriorly, the ductus deferens and vessels are removed from the peritoneum so that no recurrence occurs under the patch. 1-2 to the pubic tubercle, 3-5 to the upper edge of the patch, to the upper edge. Staples at the upper edge should remain above the iliopubic tract, no staples should be placed below. The patch is closed by overlapping the peritoneal leaves so that the patch is not visible.
patients without postoperative pain
Patients without postoperative pain after transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair
transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair
It is made through 3 holes, 10 mm optical port from the umbilicus, and 5 mm ports each from the right and left lower quadrants. The peritoneum is opened a few cm above the defect in the form of an arc. Dissection of the peritoneum, first lateral and then medial to the defect, is performed. It is continued until the pubic bone is found medially and the periphery of the bone is released. The dissection of the cord elements and the sac is completed. Posterior dissection is a very important step to avoid recurrence. Here, the peritoneum is thoroughly dissected posteriorly, the ductus deferens and vessels are removed from the peritoneum so that no recurrence occurs under the patch. 1-2 to the pubic tubercle, 3-5 to the upper edge of the patch, to the upper edge. Staples at the upper edge should remain above the iliopubic tract, no staples should be placed below. The patch is closed by overlapping the peritoneal leaves so that the patch is not visible.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair
It is made through 3 holes, 10 mm optical port from the umbilicus, and 5 mm ports each from the right and left lower quadrants. The peritoneum is opened a few cm above the defect in the form of an arc. Dissection of the peritoneum, first lateral and then medial to the defect, is performed. It is continued until the pubic bone is found medially and the periphery of the bone is released. The dissection of the cord elements and the sac is completed. Posterior dissection is a very important step to avoid recurrence. Here, the peritoneum is thoroughly dissected posteriorly, the ductus deferens and vessels are removed from the peritoneum so that no recurrence occurs under the patch. 1-2 to the pubic tubercle, 3-5 to the upper edge of the patch, to the upper edge. Staples at the upper edge should remain above the iliopubic tract, no staples should be placed below. The patch is closed by overlapping the peritoneal leaves so that the patch is not visible.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients undergoing open hernia repair
* Patients converted from laparoscopic to open
* Patients who are pregnant or likely to become pregnant
* Patients who cannot comply with the treatment or give their own consent for treatment due to their mental state
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Tepecik Training and Research Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Korhan TUNCER
General Surgeon
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Korhan Tuncer, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Tepecik Training and Research Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Tepecik Training and Research Hospital
Izmir, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Scheuermann U, Niebisch S, Lyros O, Jansen-Winkeln B, Gockel I. Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) versus Lichtenstein operation for primary inguinal hernia repair - A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Surg. 2017 May 10;17(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12893-017-0253-7.
Tolver MA, Rosenberg J, Bisgaard T. Early pain after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. A qualitative systematic review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 May;56(5):549-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02633.x. Epub 2012 Jan 19.
Etele EE, Neagoe RM, Marton D, Sala D, Torok A. Influence of Mesh Fixation on the Development of Postoperative Pain after Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Single Surgeon Experience. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2020 Sept-Oct;115(5):609-617. doi: 10.21614/chirurgia.115.5.609.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2021/04-09
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.