Chronic Pain After Groin Hernia Surgery in Women

NCT ID: NCT04228536

Last Updated: 2020-01-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

44915 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-09-01

Study Completion Date

2019-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this study was to evaluate chronic pain and reoperation rates due to recurrence after groin hernia surgery in women compared to men and surgical method.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

INTRODUCTION:

Groin hernia surgery in women is much less common than in men, still women represent a large patient group since groin hernia surgery is one of the most common operations in general surgery. In Sweden, approximately 16 000 groin hernia surgeries are being performed annually, of these 8 % are performed in women. Management and method of repair in women is largely based on subgroup analyses and register studies, there is a lack of randomised controlled trials focusing on women. Previous studies have shown that femoral hernias are more common in women than in men, that women have a higher risk of emergency operation, and a higher incidence of reoperation which serves as a marker of recurrence. Chronic pain is common after herniorraphy and an important quality marker of the performed surgery. There are indications that women suffer of higher rates of both short term and chronic post-herniorraphy pain. The introduction of mesh techniques in groin hernia surgery has considerably decreased recurrence rates. To further improve outcome after groin hernia surgery in women there is a need for more evidence of the most appropriate surgical approach in terms of chronic pain.The goal of this study was to evaluate chronic pain and reoperation rates due to recurrence after groin hernia surgery in women compared to men.

METHODS

This study is based on a patient reported outcome measure (PROM) questionnaire, crosslinked to the Swedish Hernia Registry one year after primary surgery. What the investigators would like to call a Register-PROM-study.

The Swedish Hernia Registry (SHR)

SHR is a nationwide registry which covers more than 95% of all performed groin hernia repairs in Sweden. Patients are included upon surgery. Registered parameters include details about hernia anatomy, method of repair, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status and early complications (within 30 days), among others. Using the Swedish personal identity number, where each inhabitant has a unique number, it is possible to follow patients regardless of where the participants have their primary or recurrence operation.

Questionnaire

To measure the postoperative pain one year after primary operation a shortened version of the previously validated Inguinal Pain Questionnaire (IPQ) was used. Patients were asked to grade the worst pain the participants had felt in the operated groin during the last week. Scores were:

1. No pain.
2. Pain present, but easily ignored.
3. Pain present, cannot be ignored, but does not interfere with everyday activities.
4. Pain present, cannot be ignored, and interferes with concentration on everyday activities.
5. Pain present, interferes with most activities.
6. Pain present, necessitating bed rest.
7. Pain present, prompt medical advice sought. Scores of 1-3 were defined as no pain and scores of 4-7 as chronic pain.

Data Collection

The questionnaire is sent by regular mail to everyone included in the SHR one year after surgery. Answers are recorded in the SHR. The participants are able to answer the questionnaire by mail or a web based questionnaire. Postal addresses were obtained through the Swedish population register. If no response had been received within 1 month a reminder was sent. A previous study with a similar cohort has analyzed loss to follow up and reliability of the method.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hernia, Inguinal Hernia, Femoral

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Totally ExtraPeritoneal (TEP) repair

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

TransAbdominal PrePeritoneal (TAPP) repair

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Open anterior mesh repair (OAM)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Combined Anterior and Posterior technique (CAP)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Open PrePeritoneal Mesh technique (OPPM)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Sutured Repair

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Lichtenstein Plug Prolene Hernis System (PHS) Onstep TransInguinalPrePeritoneal repair (TIPP) Nyhus Stoppa Hives McVay Bassini Shouldice Marcy

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients 15 years and older included in the SHR between 1 Sept. 2012 and 31 Aug 2017. Both elective and acute surgery is included.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients not responding to questionnaire. Patients were the first operation during inclusion period was a reoperation.
* Patient with bilateral operations during the study-period are only included once.
Minimum Eligible Age

15 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Region Jämtland Härjedalen

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Umeå University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Pär Nordin, M.D., Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Umeå University

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Franneby U, Gunnarsson U, Andersson M, Heuman R, Nordin P, Nyren O, Sandblom G. Validation of an Inguinal Pain Questionnaire for assessment of chronic pain after groin hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2008 Apr;95(4):488-93. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6014.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18161900 (View on PubMed)

Jakobsson E, Lundstrom KJ, Holmberg H, de la Croix H, Nordin P. Chronic Pain After Groin Hernia Surgery in Women: A Patient-reported Outcome Study Based on Data From the Swedish Hernia Register. Ann Surg. 2022 Feb 1;275(2):213-219. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005194.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35007224 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2019-00041

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Emergency Hernia Repair
NCT07314398 NOT_YET_RECRUITING