Randomized Study of Open Mesh Repair in Local Anesthesia Versus Cost-optimized Laparoscopic Repair for Inguinal Hernia

NCT ID: NCT01020058

Last Updated: 2016-01-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

384 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-04-30

Study Completion Date

2012-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare the frequency of long-term post operative pain after an open mesh repair ad modum Lichtenstein performed in local anaesthesia to that after an totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair (TEP) for primary inguinal hernia. The investigators will also be assessing the cost for the procedures and hospital care as well as the cost for sick-leave depending on procedure performed. The study hypothesis is that the laparoscopic approach will be associated with less long term post operative pain.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hernia, Inguinal

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Lichtenstein in local anesthesia (LLA)

Patient operated in local anesthesia, with an anterior mesh repair according to Lichtenstein

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Mesh repair for primary inguinal hernia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Open Lichtenstein repair in local anesthesia using a polypropylene mesh compared to totally extra-peritoneal laparoscopic repair using a polypropylene mesh

TEP

Patient receives a totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Mesh repair for primary inguinal hernia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Open Lichtenstein repair in local anesthesia using a polypropylene mesh compared to totally extra-peritoneal laparoscopic repair using a polypropylene mesh

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Mesh repair for primary inguinal hernia

Open Lichtenstein repair in local anesthesia using a polypropylene mesh compared to totally extra-peritoneal laparoscopic repair using a polypropylene mesh

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Lichtenstein (LLA) TEP

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Unilateral inguinal hernia
* suitable for open mesh repair in local anesthesia as well as laparoscopic repair
* ASA score I-III
* informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* ASA score IV (not suitable for TEP)
* bilateral hernias (laparoscopic repair preferable)
* recurrent hernia (primary repair affects preferable treatment)
* large scrotal hernias (not suitable for local anesthesia)
* earlier open lower abdominal surgery, aside from appendectomy (scarring may be a hindrance for TEP)
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Uppsala County Council, Sweden

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Uppsala University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ursula Dahlstrand

MD, PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Staffan Wollert, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Uppsala University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Enköping Hospital

Enköping, , Sweden

Site Status

Uppsala University Hospital

Uppsala, , Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Sweden

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Westin L, Wollert S, Ljungdahl M, Sandblom G, Gunnarsson U, Dahlstrand U. Less Pain 1 Year After Total Extra-peritoneal Repair Compared With Lichtenstein Using Local Anesthesia: Data From a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Ann Surg. 2016 Feb;263(2):240-3. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001289.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26079901 (View on PubMed)

Dahlstrand U, Sandblom G, Ljungdahl M, Wollert S, Gunnarsson U. TEP under general anesthesia is superior to Lichtenstein under local anesthesia in terms of pain 6 weeks after surgery: results from a randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 2013 Oct;27(10):3632-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2936-1. Epub 2013 Apr 10.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23572220 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2004:M-360

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.