Laparoscopic vs Open Hernia Mesh Repair for Inguinal Hernia
NCT ID: NCT00311935
Last Updated: 2009-02-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
350 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-04-30
2010-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Laparoscopic Versus Open Repair of Bilateral Primary Inguinal Hernia
NCT04357665
Randomized Study of Open Mesh Repair in Local Anesthesia Versus Cost-optimized Laparoscopic Repair for Inguinal Hernia
NCT01020058
Trial of Laparoscopic Compared to Open Inguinal Hernia Repair in Children Younger Than 3 Years
NCT00716768
Functional Outcome After Groin Hernia Mesh Repair: Open Versus Laparoscopy
NCT00625534
Laparoscopic Versus Robot-assisted Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Single Institution Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT03133533
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Phone assessment postop day 1, 1 week and at 6 months. Clinic assessment at 4 weeks, 1 year and 2 years.
Primary outcome is hernia recurrence which will be assessed by a research nurse independent of surgeon at each clinic appointment. Assessment to also include assessment of ongoing symptoms such as pain/discomfort, sensory disturbance, and sexual dysfunction.
Quality of life assessment (SF 36 questionnaire) preoperatively and at each assessment.
Pain assessment 4hrs postop and at all other assessments by score 0-10 and measurement of pain relief.
Cost analysis to include the following parameters: theatre equipment costs, theatre time, drug use, hospital stay, time to return to work, time to return to normal activities.
Interim analysis at 2 years of followup by independent Health and Safety committee. Final analysis at 4 years of followup.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
method of hernia repair
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Bilateral hernia
* Non-reducible/obstructed hernia
* Previous lower abdominal surgery/radiotherapy
15 Years
60 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Tyco Healthcare Group
INDUSTRY
Waitemata District Health Board
OTHER_GOV
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael Rodgers, MBCHB,FRACS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Waitemata District Health Board
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Waitemata District Health Board
Auckland, , New Zealand
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Hernia repair study
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.